Pierre Brunet - Para un análisis del discurso jurídico

ASCARELLI, T., Problemi giuridici , Milano, Giuffrè, 1959, p. 140.

ATIENZA, M., Curso de argumentación jurídica , Madrid, Trotta, 2013, p. 115.

ATIENZA, M., Las razones del derecho. Teorías de la argumentación jurídica , México, Unam, 2005, pp. 22 y ss.

BAUM, L., The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior , Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 2003.

BERGHOLTZ, G., “Some Thoughts on Judges’ Decision-Making”, Scandinavian Studies in Law , 2007, pp. 78-88.

BERNAL, C. et al . (dirs.), Essays in Legal Philosophy , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 37-51.

BIX, B., Jurisprudence: Theory and Context , 4.ª ed., Sweet & Maxwell, 2006, p. 183.

BRUNET, P., Jus Politicum , n.º 15, 2015.

BRUNET, P.; J.-L. HALPÉRIN y R. NOLLEZ-GOLDBACH, “Les ‘styles judiciaires’: diversité des approches, nécessité des évolutions”, Droit et société , vol. 3, n.º 91, 2015, pp. 465-471.

BULYGIN, E., Norme, validità e sistemi normativi , Giappichelli, Turin, 1995, pp. 259-260.

BULYGIN, E., “Norms, Normative Propositions, and Legal Statements (1982)”, en Essays in Legal Philosophy , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 188-206.

BULYGIN, E., “Der Bregriff des Wirksamkeit”, Archiv für Recht und Sozial Philosophie , vol. 41, n.º 4.

CAHN, E., “Fact-Skepticism and Fundamental Law”, New York University Law Review , vol. 33, n.º 1, 1958, pp. 1-17.

CARDOZO, BENJAMÍN, The Nature of the Judicial Process , New Haven, Yale University Press, 1921, p. 113.

EDWARDS, H. T., “The Effects of Collegiality on Judicial Decision Making”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review , vol. 151, n.º 5, 2003, pp. 1639-1690.

EDWARDS, H. T., “Judicial Norms: a Judge’s Perspective”, en J. N. DROBAK (dir.), Norms and the Law , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 230-244.

EDWARDS, H. T., “The Role of a Judge in Modern Society: Some Reflections on Current Practice in Federal Appellate Adjudication”, Cleveland State Law Review , vol. 32, n.º 3, 1984, pp. 385-430.

EDWARDS, H. T. y M. A. LIVERMORE, “Pitfalls of Empirical Studies that Attempt to Understand the Factors Affecting Appellate Decisionmaking”, Duke Law Journal , vol. 58, n.º 8, 2009, pp. 1895-1989.

EPSTEIN, L. y J. KNIGHT, The Choices Justices Make , Washington DC, Congressional Quarterly Press, 1998.

EPSTEIN, L., W. M. LANDES y R. POSNER, The Behavior of Federal Judges. A Theoretical & Empirical Study of Rational Choice , Cambridge US, Havard University Press, 2013.

ESKRIDGE, WILLIAM N., JR., “The judicial review game”, Northwestern University Law Review , vol. 88, n.º 1, 1993, pp. 382-395.

FRANK, JEROME, Courts on Trial , Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1949.

GARZÓN VALDÉS, E., Lateinamerikanische Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie , Munich, Luchterhand, 1965, pp. 39-58.

GOLDING, M. P., “A Note on Discovery and Justification in Science and Law”, Nomos , vol. 28, 1986, pp. 124-140.

GUASTINI, R., “Rule-Scepticism Restated”, en L. GREEN y B. LEITER (dirs.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law , Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 138-161.

GUASTINI, R., “Le réalisme juridique redéfini”, Revus , n.º 19, 2013, pp. 113-129, en línea [revus.revues.org/2511].

GUASTINI, R., Interpretare e argomentare , Milano, Giuffrè, 2011, p. 258.

GUASTINI, R., Dalle fonti alle norme , Turin, Giappichelli, 1992, p. 109.

GUTTING, G., “The Logic of Invention”, en T. NICKLES (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality , Boston-Dordrecht-London, Reidel, 1980, pp. 221-234.

HART, H. L. A., American Jurisprudence Through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream , Sibley Lecture Series, vol. 33, 1977.

HART, H. L. A., El concepto de derecho , Publicaciones de las facultades universitarias de San Luis, Bruselas, 1976.

HART, H. L. A., “Scandinavian Realism”, The Cambridge Law Journal , vol. 17, n.º 2, 1959, pp. 233-240.

HOLMES, O. W., Southern Pacific Company v. Jensen , 244 US 205, 221 (1917).

HUTCHESON, J. C., JR., “Judgment Intuitive the Function of the Hunch in Judicial Decision”, Cornell Law Quarterly , vol. 14, 1929, pp. 274-288.

KALMAN, L., Legal Realism at Yale: 1927-1960 , Chapel Hill and London, University of North Carolina Press, 1986.

LEITER, B., Naturalizing Jurisprudence. Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.

LEITER, B., “Legal Realism and Legal Positivism Reconsidered”, Ethics , vol. 111, n.º 2, 2001, pp. 278-301.

LEITER, B., “Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What is the Issue?”, Legal Theory , vol. 16, n.º 2, 2010, pp. 111-133.

LLEWELLYN, K. N., “Some Realism about Realism. Responding to Dean Pound”, Harvard Law Review , vol. 44, 1931, p. 1237.

LLEWELLYN, K. N., “A Realistic Jurisprudence. The Next Step”, Columbia Law Review , vol. 30, 1930, p. 444.

LLEWELLYN, K. N., “Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision and the Rules and Canons about How Statutes are to Be Construed”, Vanderbilt Law Review , vol. 3, 1950, pp. 395-406.

MAZZARESE, T., Forme di razionalità delle decisioni giudiziali , Turin, Giappichelli, 1996, pp. 105-157.

MILLARD, É., “Réalisme scandinave, réalisme américain. Un essai de caractérisation”, Revus , n.º 24, 2014, pp. 81-97, en línea [revus.revues.org/2915].

MORESO, J. J., Legal Indeterminacy and Constitutional Interpretation , Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1998.

NICKLES, T. (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality , Dordrecht-Boston-London, Reidel, 1980, pp. 1-59.

OLIPHANT, H., “A Return to Stare Decisis”, American Bar Association Journal , vol. 14, 1928, pp. 71-72.

PASSOS MARTINS, T., La Cour Suprême du Brésil et l’État démocratique de droit. Contribution à une théorie de la démocratie réflexive , Paris, Presses de l’Institut Universitaire Varenne, 2013.

PAUL, J., “Jerome Frank’s Attack on the ‘Myth’ of Legal Certainty”, Nebraska Law Review , vol. 36, 1957, pp. 547-563.

PAUL, J., The Legal Realism of Jerome N. Frank. A Study of Fact-Skepticism and the Judicial Process , The Hague-Boston-London, Springer, 1959.

POSNER, R., How Judges Think , Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2008, p. 80.

POSNER, R., “Realism about Judges”, Northwestern University Law Review , vol. 105, n.º 2, 2011, pp. 577-588.

REID, L., “The Judge as Law Maker”, Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law , vol. 12, n.º 1, 1972, pp. 22-29.

ROBERTSON, D., The Judge as Political Theorist: Contemporary Constitutional Review , Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2010.

RUMBLE, W. E., JR., “Jerome Frank and His Critics: Certainty and Fantasy in the Judicial Process”, Journal of Public Law , vol. 10, 1961, pp. 125-138.

RUMBLE, W. E., JR., “American Legal Realism and the Reduction of Uncertainty”, Journal of Public Law , vol. 13, n.º 1, 1964, pp. 45-75.

RUMBLE, W. E., JR., “Rule-Skepticism and the Role of the Judge: A Study of American Legal Realism”, Journal of Public Law Emory Law School , vol. 15, 1966, pp. 251-285.

RUMBLE, W. E., JR., American Legal Realism: Skepticism, Reform and the Judicial Process , Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1968.

SEGAL, J. A. y H. J. SPAETH, The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.