KELSEN, H., Teoría pura del derecho , trad. R. J. Vernengo, México, Porrúa, 1979.
KENNEDY, D., “A Semiotics of Legal Argument”, Syracuse Law Review , vol. 42, n.º 1, 1991, pp. 75-116.
KOHLER, J., “Judicial Interpretation of Enacted Law”, en Science of the Legal Method: Select Essays by Various Authors , trad. Ernest Bruncken, Boston, The Boston Book, 1917, pp. 187-201.
LEITER, B., “Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What is the Issue?”, Legal Theory , vol. 16, n.º 2, 2010, pp. 111-133.
LEPAULLE, P., “The Function of Comparative Law with a Critique of Sociological Jurisprudence”, Harvard Law Review , vol. 35, 1922, pp. 838-858.
LLEWELLYN, K. N., Jurisprudence. Realism in Theory and Practice , Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1962.
MECCARELLI, M., “Diritto giurisprudenziale e autonomia del diritto nelle strategie discorsive della scienza giuridica tra Otto e Novecento”, Quaderni Fiorentini , XL, Giudici e giuristi. Il problema del diritto giurisprudenziale fra Otto e Novecento, 2011, pp. 721-745.
POUND, R., “La place et la finalité de la théorie du droit sociologique (1911)”, trad. F. Michaut, Clio@Themis, 2012 (en línea).
POUND, R., “Judge Holmes’s Contributions to the Science of Law”, Harvard Law Review , vol. 34, n.º 5, 1921, pp. 449-453.
POUND, R., “The Scope and Purpose of Sociological Jurisprudence. Part 2”, Harvard Law Review , vol. 25, n.º 2, 1911, pp. 140-168.
POUND, R., “Enforcement of Law”, Green Bag , vol. 20, 1908, pp. 401-410.
POUND, R., “Mechanical Jurisprudence”, Columbia Law Review , vol. 8, n.º 8, 1908, pp. 605-623.
POUND, R., “Spurious Interpretation”, Columbia Law Review , vol. 7, n.º 6, 1907, pp. 379-386.
POUND, R., “The Need of a Sociological Jurisprudence”, Green Bag , vol. 19, 1907, pp. 607-615.
POUND, R., “Do We Need a Philosophy of Law?”, Columbia Law Review , vol. 5, n.º 5, 1905, pp. 339-353.
RUBIN, E. L., “The Practice and Discourse of Legal Scholarship”, Michigan Law Review , vol. 86, n.º 8, 1988, pp. 1835-1905.
RÜCKERT, J., “The Unrecognized Legacy: Savigny’s Influence on German Jurisprudence after 1900”, American Journal of Comparative Law , vol. 37, n.º 1, 1989, pp. 121-138.
SCHWEBER, H., “The Science of Legal Science: The Model of the Natural Sciences in Nineteenth-Century American Legal Education”, Law & Hist. Rev ., vol. 17, 1999, pp. 421-466.
SIEGEL, S. A., “John Chipman Gray and the Moral Basis of Classical Legal Thought”, Iowa Law Review , vol. 86, 2001, pp. 1513-1599.
SINGER, J. W., “Legal Realism Now. Legal Realism at Yale: 1927-1960, by Laura Kalman”, California Law Review , vol. 76, 1988, pp. 465-544.
SUMMERS, R., Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory , Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1992.
TREVINO, J. A., “The Influence of Sociology on American Jurisprudence: from Oliver Wendell Holmes to Critical Legal Studies”, Mid-American Review of Sociology , vol. 18, n.º 1/2, 1994, pp. 23-46.
TWINING, W., Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1973.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.