Almaz Braev - Autocracy vs. fake

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Almaz Braev - Autocracy vs. fake» — ознакомительный отрывок электронной книги совершенно бесплатно, а после прочтения отрывка купить полную версию. В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. ISBN: , Жанр: Политика, Прочая научная литература, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Autocracy vs. fake: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Autocracy vs. fake»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

The author is not against democracy. Just-auto believes that the traditional people it is contraindicated, all at once. All at once, it will just lead to irreversible tragic consequences. And in portions, dosed together with the change of generations, everything is possible. Moreover, they want it so much, but who?

Autocracy vs. fake — читать онлайн ознакомительный отрывок

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Autocracy vs. fake», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Corrupt officials as market participants.

And no one is rushing to repress anyone because market aggregates are somewhat different from the motives that guided Stalin. For the market needs of the market actors. In order for the market to function even in the form of a demonstration or global show-offs, market participants are needed, which means that corrupt officials are also needed as subjects. So Elbasy can take away everything from competitors if he wants to, of course (In this sense, it is much more difficult for Putin). Or maybe he will try again to raise young people around him? But then he would be alone.

The traditional world can’t live without corruption?

And in this very market, the subjects of corruption feel great. The answer is simple because the basis of tradition is family. A traditional person thinks about the family. This is the will or law of the ancestors. There’s no getting away from it.

Chapter VII

The «shukur» people

Who is our support in this swaying world?

Why only officials and pensioners are invited to local studios and TV shows.

Old people talk with a gasp and foam at the mouth about the greatness of the old times. So sweet that the viewer believes they lived there. Officials continue making excuses and are accountable. Some tongue-tied political scientists talk nonsense with a smart look. They also invite so-called local politicians… What else?

Channels would love to see a bigger fish. But the unspoken status, the traditional agreement ahead of the father not to climb into hell, leaves for joy a meeting exclusively with small fish. Officials come to the Studio as very frightened people who would not come here at all, but they must somehow portray unity with the people, time obliges, but rather the authorities force. Only an emergency of any scale guarantees the appearance of a big official by the standards of the system. This is a responsible person who should be responsible for the entire system. This official is responsible for his area of work. If he doesn't give an answer, it will be the end of his career.

But even very young faces were appearing among the Ministers. They also always seem to be scared and clamped down on something. But with talkative pensioners (aksakals) Kazakh channels were lucky. These pensioners are happy to come to light. And for what? To show yourself in the frontal place and not your knowledge at all. The more is often shown, the more authority they have. The list of registered political scientists is also narrow. But most of all, the so-called politicians smell acid. In the sense of saying the same thing for a long time and not trying to come up with something, but every time it still turns out that something went sour right in the Studio, and this person did not come only yesterday, although he came all the time or walked around the microphone for fifteen years. The same lecturers and speakers, officials, and artists. These people have passed the loyalty test, and therefore they almost live in these studios like at home.

Things aren't moving.

But is this the main thing? There can be no other in about two camps or subjects of activity as the conditional elite and conditional ordinary people. And only the presence of the elite and the rabble well shows the reason for such an eternal two-color cart. Even the same notorious Shukur, that are accused the people the presumptuous activists of Western freedoms and Western democracy, is only explained by this. Only, the question is, where did they come from? People of a different color of mind?

We come close to the question of where the marginals came from. And not in the sense of marginals like Russophiles ("vata") or great-power Imperials. But where did the steppe Democrats come from? When people of a great tradition should be divided into two camps – the elite and subordinates. Forever and ever. Not when the clock of eternity is ticking but constantly.

So, we came to people who appear, excite the crowd, exciting hopes, and quickly disappear like the same celestial meteors. Only from the meteors of heaven, a certain bright light pours. And from searchlights and scammers, otherwise, our stars cannot be called, only glare for five minutes. Why do they appear in the general pile of conditional provocateurs? Why do they break the inertia of the herd of conditional rams when no one allowed them to graze someone? In general, all traditional people believe that if someone came out into the open and shouted a message, then this person is at work. He was required to go out and tell people the news. And today, when one of the incentives is money, someone hired criers on their behalf, the money was taken, and they need to work out. We need to focus on this point. The mass of the people may be stupid. But at such a moment, everyone is a wise man because everyone judges by himself. And the average worldly wisdom says: do not twitch if you are not given an order. The second part is from humility to calling the boss: do not do anything, but do as everyone does and generally blend in with the crowd so that the wolf does not eat you, be in the center, not on edge. So, we find Shukur man together.

Be content with little and be silent.

The traditional man in his matrix is always content with little. Otherwise, he will be reprimanded. Consistently from the father, brothers, relatives, uncle, family, in General, the clan society, he will be convicted and even punished. Otherwise, he is not a traditional person. If you do something when no one gives permission, it is to make a challenge, consistently to the father, brothers, uncle, and so on.

So, in this general Shukur fall and officials of all ranks, and politicians that are sour and conditional sour milk, and political scientists, and journalists, in general, everyone who was chosen by the system of father and brothers. Conditional, of course, father and brothers. But the system is accurate. But the very fact that someone appears playing of such a tribe means that they are authorized by a higher brother or relatives (that is, officials). These people are the same shukur as calm peaceful, super peaceful even (in the opinion of marginal upstarts) from the ordinary crowd. Official people are official Shukur. The people who are not official, who no one authorizes, are the Shukur people. This is a traditional people. What about our meteorites?

Where to put the upstart meteors?

And why do they suddenly disappear on the highest note of their cry?

Well, first, as we just found out, no one screams for no reason here. If a screaming man is a massive head, you might say the only big man may shout. If someone shouts, and he’s not the boss, this person quickly runs away after shouting. He will worry again for the money and authorize him to shout George Soros’s philanthropist. Here, meteorites are closer to the market discourse.

In a situation of two camps, two subjects, two colors, the elite, and the grassroots, may appear to the people who have lost their place. These are also traditional people because only the steppe people disappear after a sudden departure without an invitation to the podium. Still, they want to be the elite very much, so they climb the podium. They are infantile, and the passions of fame devour. But since they still have a father and brothers, they disappear of their accord, rather understand that they’re nobody here anymore – the rabble. But for the moment that they had or the short time that their passion aroused them, they wanted to feel like the elite, and they did. From now on, they are marginalized. Now they are slaves not to their brothers but to their passion. These caliphs of local politics are very poorly prepared for a one-time exit. They’re really not ready. Their speech is poor, and their thoughts are poor. But going out uninvited in such a shukur setting is a feat: sensation, emergency. Only passion and knowledge turn them into marginals. These are the kind of people, laymen, who fill the official airwaves. And as politicians, these people are funny, not serious at all. Rather, they imitate someone.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Autocracy vs. fake»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Autocracy vs. fake» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Autocracy vs. fake»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Autocracy vs. fake» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x