Almaz Braev - Autocracy vs. fake

And who is going to work? Most importantly, physical labor immediately becomes much of the lower classes, almost slaves. This is a different question, who works and who only eats.

The propaganda, you are a person. Where is it from? Why does the Eurasian understanding of the personality of a warrior hero and a convinced prophet and citizen differ from the merchant’s desire? To please whom? The hero wants to win, and the merchant wants to please.

The merchant does not care who is in front of him, and his main desire is to sell his goods. Because of this, he will praise the freak like beautiful, the dullard that he is cool, the upstart that he is serious, and so on. If he buys a product, item, and clothing in a merchant shop, he will leave very satisfied with himself. And the seller will forget this “person”.

The European identity and human rights were born in the market, and the Eurasian hero and fighter in a fight, in the struggle.

That’s why there is such a discrepancy. But European flattery is certainly close to a weak person, but proud. Many traditional people are very susceptible to flattery. Just take them with your bare hands after a couple of compliments. The European personality is picked up for free and went for a walk. And not just like that, but in front of everyone. Therefore, the European personality has an element of show, ostentation, speculation, hypocrisy, and all that is not liked in the Eurasian one. Isn’t that why the vanguard of “personalities” are perverts, psychopaths, moral freaks, vagabonds who received free money (maybe oppositionists), and they went berserk? If a person is also paid for, what kind of person is it? We are not talking about all Europeans. Most of them are decent normal people. We’re talking about images. What do people of traditional culture notice first of all in modern Europe and emphasize these qualities?

Market modern “personalities,” of course, like people with money. This is not necessarily the oligarchs, but the oligarchs in the first place. Market personalities scold corrupt officials. But not because they stole, but because other people pay them for shouting and denouncing corrupt officials. Oligarchs, for example, pay their journalists, and they write all kinds of criticism on competitors. Opposition oligarchs use-dependent people to take risks of them and so on. In general, it does not matter where the money comes from, and it is important to expose and, if possible, on camera so that you can see that they are individuals. That’s why many people started taking their selfies because the more a person likes himself, the more he is your client. Total clogging of the selfie network is an infection of the personality virus. At the bazaar, for example, where all persons buy and sell. Empty people, it is known, loves themselves most of all and runs to where the empty people gather, empty of empty, but who is shown on the screen and say that this is a star. That’s why the stars of the screen and the stars, in general, have got mixed up with stellar empty liberals. For example, one well-known oppositionist slept with a minor, and he still has a good relationship and mutual friendship with his sponsor. (for the sponsors of any perversion – it is a fact that is more important than another fact). If uncles with money say that a person does things, it does not matter what value, and if this very person scolds the authorities – this is the most useful person.

In a geopolitical confrontation in this way through a corrupt person, ( oligarch?) the most important to finish off the Eurasian person like a prostitute. Anyone who is willing to sell out or give up in this way makes a conscious choice not out of conviction but out of the calculation.

The traditional people are child people. If you know the child, it is easy to direct them. The opposition says that the autocrat was lucky with the people. This is at first glance. Any Ulugbek Khan, leader Trotsky or President of the Kyrgyz people Akayev can lose the country and the people through the fault of the child. In fact, each of these intelligent leaders lost control of the people because they played the soft, wise rule. These are facts from history. Are the same Kazakhs at the level of the Soviet people of the 30s? And this is not a coincidence because such a coincidence is dangerous for everyone. All Central Asia consists of the traditional (Zerefs) peoples. Even the Soviet government met traditionally quietly, modestly, and not noticeably. Nothing has changed, and nothing has changed even now. Everything just went back to normal today – such a life such people have always had.

Simultaneously, millions of traditional Kazakh people from the villages rushed to the big cities-administrative centers, where mostly non-Kazakhs lived because the urban population was advanced (and newcomers looked them in the mouth, how all children look at their teachers at school). A new culture has always been formed in cities. Although, any person could then and today break out of the traditional village environment and move to the city. There, everyone can learn and become the same authority as your relatives. No one would hurt. That’s what cities are for so that students look into the mouths of teachers. And looking in the mouth is a culture of almost filial deference. All traditional people look in the mouth of all authorities and teachers. It depends on education and discipline.

Kazakhs were absorbed in urban life, Soviet urbanization, and now the market has literally swallowed them.

And the Kazakhs, who are accustomed to answering only to their kind (before the clan, but not before the state – A. B) learn to answer, while only to their families. If you are lucky, the steppe people are willing to invite you to their feasts in the past and now. The lucky respected Kazakhs invite everyone to visit; this is normal to show your high level. All traditional peoples have no other reason to invite guests. This is the culture. It’s a tradition to invite guests. One doesn’t interfere with the other.

Finally, former nomads are afraid to lose, and even they do not know what. For example, competition with their relatives, neighbors, just familiar people. The child is also afraid of getting lost. That is why many Kazakh Muslims say Shukur all the time; they do not look for good from the good. So we’re good, and we say Alla Shukur!

This is still the level of prohibitions or the very first level of taboos.

Not losing face is like not losing sheep. This is such a loss. That is why the steppe people in the past are not accustomed to any other type of responsibility, except for responding to their relatives and now just acquaintances. But don’t show yourself to the rams and don’t show your status to the rams? (although, of course, this “responsibility” to friends and relatives is more like a show-off, show-offs in modern terms). So, why doesn’t Yelbasy (or Putin in the North), who is lucky with the people (the people who are afraid of losing a non-essential show-off or don’t know what), rein in their corrupt officials, or rather servants? After all, all corrupt officials are officials of their system. Do not forget that Stalin led a policy based on state ownership, and Elbasy managed the Kazakh market after the General privatization. It’s easier for him.

If the people are a child, then the people of the child must have a father.

Or the father of the people, Elbasy is the greatest authority for them. Cult and fame do not arise from scratch. The same phenomenon has been and will continue to be the case for all non-urbanized traditional peoples who are afraid of losing any crumbs that fate and history have measured out.