Almaz Braev - Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Almaz Braev - Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat» — ознакомительный отрывок электронной книги совершенно бесплатно, а после прочтения отрывка купить полную версию. В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. ISBN: , Жанр: Альтернативная история, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

No one was tempted by the teachings of Karl Marx, except countries with openly traditional morals. The lower classes, who were not cultured and did not reflect much, destroyed the more cultured and talented people. The clearest grotesque version occurred in Kampuchea, where the Khmer Rouge killed people simply for the glasses of intellectuals. Does it turn out that Marx was very popular in Asia?

Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat — читать онлайн ознакомительный отрывок

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Tradition against communism

Explanation of the defeat

Almaz Braev

© Almaz Braev, 2022

ISBN 978-5-4498-5036-2

Created with Ridero smart publishing system

Introduction

The peasant Thermidor showed real evolution to the conformists, not Marx’s class evolution.

Why the left idea now is marginal. Because the left idea, as conformists understand it, is the idea of landless peasants who were promised land and factory proletarians who were promised factories. This is the stage before industrial re-equipment, as far as the peasants are concerned, or the post-factory stage, when everything depended on literal physical strength and the working majority. Those who had nothing began to struggle for material happiness. But the same proletarian who in the interpretation of Ancient Rome had nothing but himself had to “have the whole world” in the interpretation of Karl Marx’s Manifesto. Having acquired material values, even in the reduced form of the Stalinist regime, the proletariat does not need anything else, as it turned out, except vodka. And the Soviet regime got the workers drunk to solve the problems of the next Congress and the state’s economic problems. Only following the tradition and putting down roots, the smartest men began to teach their children to get a certificate. Peasant sharpness! Only in the traditional world with a certificate is any person actually a person. Although the further, the more these crusts have become a fiction about knowledge, especially on the periphery of the Soviet Empire and more of the same piece of paper in the form of a pass to the elite. But it’s too late. The smartest proletarians and residents of the bottom took root, climbed up, and privatized all state property. This strategic carelessness of the Soviet regime, and even more precisely of Marxism, showed that Marx, followed by his friend Engels, although Engels seems to have studied the “Origin of the family, private property, and the state”, turned out to be weak dialectics of human nature, and even more precisely did not know anything about tradition.

What is tradition, why is tradition?

But it is a tradition that explains that a peasant before he becomes a nobleman or an official, needs to start roots get seeds into the right soil. Also, it is the crowd of the physical majority of peasants and post-proletarian peasants in the Soviet system. First thanks to ideas about social justice, then thanks to knowledge and experience have made their way to the very top of power, they to diced in there. And then put down roots. Privatize all property. Then egghead analysts are even looking at this as a conspiracy of the West. But for the correct treatment of the patient, you need a correct diagnosis. Eggheaded analysts who fool heads with the conspiracy of the West and Trotskyists are just a reflection of private egoism, the same as that of the Soros grant-eater. These are the ends of one stick. One wants to get a grant and go to a restaurant, and the other wants to sell his books and be known as a patriot and guru of Russia.

So, why are there no leftists today, and shouldn’t there be? If you look at the world through the eyes of the beginning of the last century.

Because there is no more Karl Marx proletariat, in such numbers as Marx, Lenin, and Trotsky saw them. This is the completed stage, along with the production cycles. Today there are and will be only statists. Or the patriots. Who are also very similar to the fascists.

Suppose you look at the world again with old eyes. It’s just that if the private property has been abolished by law in the state, then this is left-wing statism. In this case, the state manipulates the property because the people have not had the property for centuries. If the property in the state is immutable and has been for a long time because many generations have lived like this and passed the inheritance from generation to generation, then this is right statism. You can also call it something else. And there are many shades of right now because the property has taken root all over the world. And all these people want more property. Including the so-called proletarians. Modern proletarians are no different from ordinary citizens. They have the same property, the same rights as everyone else. They carry the same goals and needs as the population.

The so-officially called leftists today have such leaders as that peasant boy from the village of Mymrino, who grew up, unlearned, penetrated the party, and now began to lie publicly. This is the same oligarch. But an unusual oligarch. He is not selling oil or gas, but faith and an idea. Why they do this, you will learn from this book. Unless, of course, there were never factories in the area where they were born. The same fate, the creeping peasant Thermidor, awaits all the world’s leftists.

CHAPTER I

BUT AND BEN

Whether he is a revolutionary or Jesus Christ himself, any pioneer should know. Before him, many inert masses used this road. From year to year, the crowd went back and forth from century to century. This is called tradition. It never occurred to anyone that the path could be used in any other way. Walk with other thoughts. All sorts of left-wing thoughts only get in the way of any habit. Like an obstacle in the way that any team member has walked many times. And here is an obstacle… Any sighted person will certainly bypass the new adventure and go on the path again, even with a blindfold.

Life is an interesting thing. Someone’s old and proven skills are immediately passed on to the new generation. This new generation may not care at all and not check the experience of fathers. On the contrary, the young always say that their ancestors were great. They always praise their ancestors. For land, for shelter, for being born into a strong people. In other words, they praise both modernity and old experience. If the old experience were bad, there would be no land or shelter. A person who does not support this patriotism will be met with suspicion. If ordinary people watch in silence, then the nobles or the elite will persuade ordinary people to beat the scoundrel. And he will be banished. These noble people-elders (Zerots) adopted the old experience and the status of their parents. Any modern elite spent a lot of energy with their ancestors to lead their people in the old way. They say their ancestors drove the enemies and aggressors, and now my heirs will remain in charge. We are talking about the traditional elite (Zerots) and traditional peoples. This is the history of many centuries.

And then there is a strange person who says that you are not thinking correctly, that you're not standing right, that you're turning the wrong way. Oh, the horror! You are all living wrong. And anyway, you believe the wrong gods.

Now you must imagine the Sanhedrin's reaction to the appearance of Jesus Christ. The greatest man who called himself the son of God. The Council of elders or the Jewish Zerots were most indignant at this unheard-of impudence. They were on the trail of their fathers, and then this upstart came along. The Pharisees made the main effort to have this rebel crucified. Not the king of the Jews. Not the Procurator of Judea. He just washed his hands of it. Namely, the high priest of Caiaphas and his colleagues for the coveted walking trails managed to kill the prophet.

What do I want to say?

I want to say that in a place where they have walked the same way for centuries, moved by inertia, and observed all the rites, expecting nothing and obeying inertia, suddenly someone will appear. This someone will say, here you go back and forth, back and forth for many centuries, maybe even a thousand years, and now the earth will fall under you. Well, not literally, of course.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x