Almaz Braev - Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Almaz Braev - Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat» — ознакомительный отрывок электронной книги совершенно бесплатно, а после прочтения отрывка купить полную версию. В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. ISBN: , Жанр: Альтернативная история, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

No one was tempted by the teachings of Karl Marx, except countries with openly traditional morals. The lower classes, who were not cultured and did not reflect much, destroyed the more cultured and talented people. The clearest grotesque version occurred in Kampuchea, where the Khmer Rouge killed people simply for the glasses of intellectuals. Does it turn out that Marx was very popular in Asia?

Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat — читать онлайн ознакомительный отрывок

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

The mountaineer Stalin with painful self-esteem and the terrorist who led the world revolution with peasant gardens and the Russian world failed not only in their military plan to take Warsaw and then continue their March on Berlin but also created the path of the USSR as “socialism in one country” or socialism in a “besieged fortress”. This moment, or an accidental coincidence, determined the end of Marxism as a project and of the world revolution as a matter of fact. Socialism was defeated. Socialism did not take place as an alternative system.

Russian world, as we know, is built on the community, on the so-called Russian world. This world allows controlling every community member to work well, diligently, not be lazy, and not raise their heads. When Karl Marx’s propagandists came, there was no better audience than the Russian one. The most sensitive ears and the most responsive hearts they no longer found. It was not the European hearts of the burghers and Junkers that were the most fertile ground for agitation, but the Russian peasants, because they did not recognize individuals within the community. Speculators of various kinds – the bourgeoisie were not completely created in Russia. The big bourgeoisie was not formed; it was not enough. There was an absolute majority only of the small peasant bourgeoisie. Speculators, various hucksters were despised by the people. The Russian community had a dictatorship of old people. It was the dictatorship of folk, as a dictatorship conditioned by cultural history; therefore, they liked the idea of the dictatorship of the proletariat. Dark, ignorant people felt their world of fathers in the dictatorship. So, the Zerefs found their beards in Marx’s beard as the fish found its pond.

All that was alien to the world (of the old) and control should have died out. Under the banner of this dictatorship, the zerefo-remids (Zeremids) or the offspring of serfs exterminated the entire Communist aristocracy (the intelligentsia, Lenin – Trotsky’s associates) under the leadership of Stalin. Thus, according to Revcon, the proletarians, who were the oppressed, former peasants of the community, became the” creators “of the world of communism in the interpretation of traditional artists – creators, who in 72 years with the arrival of the market, will also become” personalities”, individuals – buyers. Note that all the personnel for reforms and the government are always drawn from below. The people themselves give them. The opposite is true. Not the aristocracy, at least some feudal, it was shot first, not the Communist intelligentsia – from among the revolutionary authorities, they were shot in 37, and the lower classes.

We already know that Zerefs becomes Zeremids, then Remids, which is the scale of reflection growth. Fools have never been put over the Russian world- the community and its part; otherwise, there will be damage to all the community members. They never gave fools rights. Under so-called socialism, the best of the worst was chosen, or rather, modest and sympathetic, respectful of the elderly and tradition. Not the most talented were made leaders but were chosen from candidates with folk roots. Discipline and subordination are in the first place. From here, any sprouts of selfishness were suppressed and cornered by the community. Receiving Remid’s quality or right of the user received and the benefits, consistent with tradition. Do you ask why the revolutionary peasants exterminated the revolutionaries?

New and expensive items replaced the old badges they used to wear for prestige. American jeans and sausage could replace them, all the universe. And when the Remids had a second generation, and then a third, and even super-literate all, Soviet former pioneers and Komsomol members from the generation of creators of socialism turned into greedy and corrupt bankers and stockbrokers.

But they were not replaced. Why? And here’s why. We must remember who these leaders of the Russian world were in the form of the CPSU and the USSR. And they were all zeref-remids, or the first generation of the city. For Zeremids dressed in an expensive suit is an important and memorable event. The Zeremids are all very vain and weak to promote, always waiting and waiting for witness’s flattery. All modest people love flattery. That’s the law Tracia (traditional society – Revcon). All weaklings love it. The President is also a huge” person”. At market flea markets, traders do not sell eyeglass frames with the names “President”, “Diplomat”, “Prime Minister” for nothing. Many private organizations are also headed by presidents, political science centers, and institutions where there is only one employee, and he is also the President. It’s not just fashion. This is flattery. Therefore, it should be clear that if Zeref can be bought with forty varieties of sausage and jeans, Zeremids and Remids are bought by status and flattery, especially if the new status frees them from the world allows them to enrich themselves immeasurably. Immeasurably! Thus, it will be necessary to upset the “conspiracy theory” supporters that the USSR fell due to external intrigues and the undermining of American intelligence. In fact, the traditional values of encouragement, growth, and market gifts have coincided.

For Zerefs the petty dreams, for Remids is gold!

But first, a lot of good words-flattery. As individual presidents, Republican and peripheral leaders began to reduce the community’s residence, or more precisely, its control over their affairs. Hence, the stake is not on Soviet idealism, not on past residents and conscience, but on civil (forces) and ethnic solidarity and on the return to the Russian world, on national identity. Since literate but disenfranchised people (scoops) were given imported items in return, therefore they did not resist these so-called reforms from above. They fell silent at once out of habit. After all, the upper classes (old people) know better. So, the new nationalism turned out not at the expense of the Zerefs, who in the second generation become Zefa-fanatics, but at the expense of one name, that it is allegedly nationalism, we are building a national state, and that’s it. That’s it.

The Remids are statesmen.

This is the elite. They can’t be nationalists. In any case, the Soviet ones, but only in the form of a project. That’s why the first nationalism was not real, but an invention of the CPSU (old Communists-Pharisees).

Not yet. If for silence and submission shops (now supermarkets) fill with sausage, cheese, tea, and other deficits, why not? Since any building rests on a Foundation, they dig a pit of products for nationalism. The selection of less reflective people in the new market elite was not only at the expense of ethnicity because you are a Zeref, a person from the people, and not a Remid. Native speech became the best means of selection. What languages were spoken peoples before the revolution? Went permanent wailing and crying on the language of ethnic groups from different parts of the USSR. Which began to subside as the first forms of the market building appeared. Don’t forget for a moment that all these reforms were written by a market composer. The market is the main customer of ethnic music here. The Zerefs, people from the people born on the periphery, came out on top again and stood in the line of trumpeters of privatization. They were only needed for privatization. According to the law, the traditions have become the new Zeremids to become the new traditional elite. And help. And join the new elite. At this time, new residents settled in the cities and their children grew up. And reflexivity has become borderline, has fallen. Now there is neither democracy nor freedom. Only food is plentiful in the supermarket in a painted wrapper. But the market in the middle waving his wand invisible the conductor of the orchestra: “All who sell all are personality!”

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x