Almaz Braev - Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat

So the children of people who ran away from the settlements to the cities and engaged in anything, mostly in trade, became Zefa (zefag = zeref+ refag) and gave the most real symptom of nationalism – being chosen based on external data and ethnic speech. Thus, Revcon reveals the influence of the market, which needs Zeref workers. Maybe someone will say at this point that Marx had nothing to do with it. He wanted the proletariat to make leaders, creators of socialism and thus destroy the traditional world. Who has nothing become everything… And where was the market? How did it get back? Yes, the proletariat or a former member of the peasant world could become everything, but for this, it did not have to destroy its intelligentsia. Only the intelligentsia, destroyed in 1937, could save it from failure. After all, Zeref never gives a single front-the whole. And the market surprisingly came from the other side, in 1991. And it said: the person is the one who chews.

Glossary:

The Zeref- a traditional person with rigidly set social actions, low reflection almost zero, hence the word zeref-reflection zero (zeref).). Has no semitones, serves the idols of the genus, communicates in the circle of native blood. Zeref has no semitones of perception, is categorical, irreconcilable, hostile to others and to another opinion in the development of rejection of “not your own”

The zeref ‘s loop – the baby boom, overheating of the population.

The Zerot (zeroot = zeref+root) – the traditional feudal elite

The zerot’s loop creates a solid cast, impenetrable social barriers. None of the lower castes can enter the feudal elite. The lack of social mobility pre-revolutionary situation.

The Remid – a new traditional elite, rulers, officials, authorities, teachers; remid put actions for zerefs, determine morality, laws, politics, reflection average-middle (remiddle).

The remid’s loop – the elite's struggle with the brightest personality, the cooperation of second and third parties against the hero and the prophet.

The Refag is a person of a trading civilization in several generations; reflection is high, selfish, utilitarian-refag (re + high).

The Zeremid is a man of the first generation of traditional elites (or city, fresh citizen). If this is a modern Zeremid, it is usually a former villager who has superficially mastered the culture of urban life; he is half urban and half rural. He has a half-hard social reflex custom, neither the inferiority complex that wants to cover up, so he invents a new ancestry, creates a fine root and has the fancy “tail” behind.

Zefa is a man from the city's first generation with inclinations towards the market and speculation, and to trade, at least what, he was forced by circumstances.

The zeremid’s loop – the Zeremids are approximate imitators. They imitate the elite, any idea, any direction just to be good for their families. By imitation, hypocrisy, and even fanaticism, they harm any cause, state, or idea. Hypocrisy, pharisaism, fanaticism, the adjustment of marginal strata to the existing idea and order. When the elite religious organizations from governments accumulate the Zeremids, there is stagnation and crisis. The collapse of the idea and system of Zeremids conformity is inevitable. They adapt to the system for the sole purpose of supporting their family. That is, they do the same thing as the Zerefs, but for this, they want to get into the elite, the privileged stratum, or the state system, they quickly learn, master new skills, and imitate the formal standards of idea and responsibility.

The Zelot is a superman, a hero, a prophet, the most gifted among the traditional elite. A Zelot is an ambitious but disinterested person, he is a fighter against the traditional elite (Zerots), with Pharisee officials (Remids, Zeremids), with the people, if the peoples are obsessed with dark passions.

Revcon – revolution conservatism

Who is the Communist Sharikov? A certain Professor Preobrazhensky operated to transform a dog into a man. This new half-human was given the name Sharikov. Sharikov is a character from Bulgakov’s novel.

Karl Marx: “Crude communism” is only a form of manifestation of the vileness of private property that wants to assert itself as a positive community” (18, p.116). Great! Russian peasants liked Marxism so much, but the Russian intelligentsia did not. The European intelligentsia and bourgeoisie did not show much passion for Marxism.

Russian peasants liked Marxism for its clear side of equality. When Marxism came to Russia, the soldiers of the Russian Tsar were tired of dying for the Tsar. Even before the world war and the revolution in Russia, the land issue became more acute. Russian intelligentsia did not need land; Russian intelligentsia needed civil rights. The bourgeoisie did not have equal rights with the Russian nobility. Russia was still a feudal power. Not all Russian intelligentsia was fascinated by Marxism, but almost all of them sought equality in civil rights. Hence, the search for truth and this truth is actually bourgeois. The Tsar was not arrested by noblemen who had dynasties but by young noblemen whose fathers had recently received the title along with their government jobs. Of course, there were no Marxists among these patriots. But then they appeared a few months later as the main actors of the revolution.

Someone will think that the main motive of the Russian Revolution was banal envy. “Take and share!”. But this is not the case. You can’t say that about the intelligentsia, but you can partially say that. The main quality of the bourgeoisie is ambition. Marxist intellectuals spoke on behalf of those who disliked these smart and important intellectuals. In any feudal community, smart people were never liked, considered upstarts. Therefore, the people became important and intelligent after the revolution, and the revolutionary intelligentsia was shot. Russian community (and not only Russian) has always wanted to have a strict leader. The leader of a feudal community must be strict, even cruel, and not necessarily smart. Therefore, any official elected by the revolution quickly turned into a feudal lord. Such a master of Soviet Russia was Stalin – the new red Tsar. The new red Tsar and his people shot smart intellectuals and raised the “lousy” intelligentsia. This intelligentsia also disliked talented people out of a dislike for smart and extraordinary leaders, every Soviet leader after Stalin was even funnier than the previous one. They looked more like the heads of a Soviet collective farm, a kind of Russian community, but without a Tsar, an Orthodox faith, but with mechanical tractors instead of an ancient plow. Soviet leaders replaced each other in high positions and decreased even in physical growth: small, small, then even smaller. This is not the self-sufficient person that Karl Marx described. There was no place even for the intimidating Soviet intelligentsia. However, all the peasants wanted to get joy and got it. Everyone wanted to be intelligent to become a master of bureaucracy. The feudal hierarchy has not disappeared. She just changed and became unrecognizable. But all former peasants received education to get a state position and a high salary.

Then these same people wanted freedom and democracy. But all the intellectuals who came out of the people disliked their people, were Russophobes. Because all educated people, all intellectuals were harassed, they went through bullying, as did the revolutionary intellectuals before them. But they were not shot as revolutionary intellectuals. Because they came from the people, they kept their anger at the crowd, and this anger accumulated from childhood. They were teased as children because the Russian peasants and proletarians disliked people in clean clothes with exemplary behavior, handkerchiefs, and scarves. The whole country was a colossal construction site of socialism. The proletarians under dictator Stalin built new factories, power plants, bridges, and Railways. And then there were some suspicious and clean people walking around. No, they didn’t like intellectuals. Therefore, 72 years later, when the Russian democratic reforms began in 1991, all liberal Russian intellectuals had some kind of flaw, some physical flaw, and even mental abnormalities. This intelligentsia was teased cruelly from childhood. Why should liberal intellectuals love Soviet Russia? They suffered from strabismus, and many remained psychopaths. Karl Marx’s alternative man and the real Communists were destroyed by rural Pharisees and their assistants’ surname Sharikovs in 1937. This means that Marx did not describe the social emancipation of a person from the people, in our case Zeref (reflection zero, ze-re), but a person still average, with low intelligence and a person of weak culture. To remove self-alienation, that is, when a person is aware of himself as a person, they need basic knowledge, the ability to read and write, and culture, starting opportunities. But in conscientious Russia, the dictatorship of the proletariat, that is, the new dictatorship of the Russian community, was taken as the basis.