Almaz Braev - Autocracy vs. fake

Oppositionists talk about the cult; singers sing odes to everyone at once and to themselves, of course, at the same time. Even pop singers want to avoid disappearing from the airwaves. They also sing on Patriotic themes during the breaks of pop concerts. The feeling that in a traditional society, literally, everyone comes forward with their feet as imitating the first person? (The expression “forward feet” means that the person is carried out through the door when he takes the horizontal position of the corpse).

The entire population steps forward in feet.

The tradition of going forward with your feet is total everywhere. If the idols of society can't stand it, they will be thrown off, removed from work, by competitors, or they will leave themselves, then they know and everyone knows that no one needs them from that moment, if they actually leave. In fact, from now on, he is no one – not a boss, not a sage, not a philosopher, not a singer at all. No one to sing about, no one to praise, no one to suck up to. Everyone forgets him and passes by, and even excellent friends stop saying Hello. This encourages bosses, worthless politicians, and mediocre singers to sit until the end. Until they are actually literally carried out feet first out of the office.

2. Everyone is busy looking for a reliable host. This is protection from other robbers. "Roof".

People who do not fall into the category of respected, the stars, VIP authorities are always looking for such authorities to hide under their authority. And they want to tell everyone that he is my relative, my friend, he is my idol, and I love and respect him very much. I love him for life. Although love is certainly artificial in a competitive environment of fanatics without a direct relationship, the only way to stand out is to confess unlimited love. Hence, the potential accumulation of the cult of each first authority. I'm not even talking about the government, about the people in power, about the leader. Everyone can see it. This is all clear to everyone. The leader is simply doomed to popular love and adoration. At the bottom, at the very end of the pyramid, everyone is not interested and despised by everyone.

The leader has the biggest cult potential.

Everyone will confess their love, and others are afraid that not confessing is a crime. If the leader notices that someone does not show active love or the enemies inform him about the unlucky man, he is finished in terms of his career. Not literal. It’s about a career. Along with the market, the love of authority will also grow strongly. The cult will also grow. The field of authority is narrowed to a handful of people and one leader figure for the specific goals of each “loving” without looking back. Thus, the meaning of work is not the work itself, not the profession or professionalism, but the expression of love and devotion. Loyalty becomes a mandatory job. Even corrupt criminal offenses are forgiven for loyalty. The category outside the chosen circle and the chosen circle itself is in an eternal search for cover – a roof in a modern way. The father of nations inevitably becomes the greatest protection of the entire nation.

When the barbarians took Rome, they could only plunder and kill. Robbers and murderers were not responsible and could not answer for their crimes.

Who are the judges?

The sacred innovation of the times of the bloody Romanov monarchy gets new colors here. Judges are only descendants, and the judge is history. For contemporaries, if they are new Romans, then woe to the vanquished at once; if they are new barbarians, then barbarians are supposed to plunder and bring booty to the family. Barbarian’s family will not condemn him but will support him. Therefore, the barbarian carries everything into the house.

Ideologists of liberalism claim that if all Zerefs (traditional people) are given property, they will automatically become responsible. So responsible that they will eventually demand democratic governance and root out corruption. Is it true?

But what we see.

We see that the Zerefs are getting rich and don’t want to be responsible for anything. On the contrary, they carry everything to the family and build large houses (almost castles) for the family. What happens on the street the corruption and despotism of any kind; they don’t care, as long as to make the family feel good, they are not interested in anything else. On the contrary, any boss and corrupt official causes traditional people to understand: an official, a despot, and even a “tyrant” in his workplace does everything for the family. In fact, any Zeref in his place would do the same. And to infinity. Why is it that someone else is surprised that nothing will happen to big corrupt officials; they will not be convicted but amnestied? Answer. They carry everything to the family. What questions can there be? Does no one directly or indirectly condemn theirs? From the point of view of tradition and the depth of centuries, this is all normal. Who will bring the most to the grotto, the same, the most beloved?

Who condemns indirectly?

Who might have forgotten about their family? Or maybe he compares someone else’s family and someone else’s fate? I suspect that the comparison has the appearance of simple greed; otherwise, there are no other motives in the tradition. An indirect denouncement of a corrupt official could write only weak warriors and nothing more. He’s weak, and he’s jealous. He didn’t bring anything to the grotto.

Here are some examples.

When the barbarians sacked Rome, and the Romans fled, the eternal city seemed to disappear after the plunder. What was recently, but it immediately disappeared. What used to be called Rome turned into a gothic village with the same gothic name. How and how was it possible to unite the gothic shepherds, who, before the capture of Rome and its plunder, grazed cattle with the natives? Some knew the law, and others didn’t.

What is the law of the barbarians?

The barbarian must know that each of his actions will be appreciated by his clan, so the barbarian is generous and sympathetic, but not to strangers, but only to the people of his clan (that is, to his relatives). The most authoritative leader is the one who gives away makes gifts to the people. (In Saudi Arabia, sheikhs still do this – they give out gifts, as the ancient sheikhs did 1000 years ago. But the sheikhs are very civilized people)

Where did the castle come from in the Middle Ages? They didn’t exist before.

If so happened, the barbarians (Goths and Vandals, Alans, Huns) scattered across the free land, where the former owners escaped. What should they do? Who should they answer to? After all, the Romans were not there. So, the barbarian will not answer to anyone, he is his master, and all the loot will be put in one place. To protect yourself from other barbarians just like him, he built an impregnable fortress, dug a moat, and let the river into the moat – here you have a medieval castle – fortress. (Have you noticed such locks now? I see. Although in the yard of the XXI century)

No relatives and no judges. There are no judges, so everyone now judges. They can trample everyone under their horse (now under cars), or they can ride anywhere they want. Who would they answer to? In front of those who think to take everything to the family? Yes, they are the same as them, only they do not have a horse and a castle (mansion, account, car Park). This is how traditional people learn to co-exist in the new Middle Ages, which they create as if reluctantly. Anyone who wants protection must work for the owner, who will launch it into their feudal castle. Those who do not want protection will go without a roof or protection. Traditional people are the sources of their own medieval troubles. The Middle Ages come precisely and invisibly, while some fighters against corruption will build a democracy. After the fall of Rome, there was no democracy for more than 1,000 years. Even if the fighters build a democracy themselves or thanks to the West, it will still be a castle with new vassals and feudal lords. It’s always been that way. In medieval castles, this is evidence of the lack of ideas and any responsibility.