Fabio Núñez del Prado - Justicia de papel

Koziol, H. (2008) Punitive Damages – A European Perspective. Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, 741-764.

Kühn, W. y Van Oeveren, H. (2018) The full recovery of third-party funding costs in arbitration: to be or not to be? Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 35, No. 3, 307-328.

Lahav, A. (2017). In praise of litigation. Oxford University Press.

Landes, W. M. y Posner, R. A. (1975) The Private Enforcement of Law. The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-46.

Lévy, L. y Bonnan, R. (2013) Chapter 7. Third-party funding disclosure, joinder and impact on arbitral proceedings. En Cremades, B. y Dimolitsa, A. (Eds), Third-party funding in international arbitration (ICC Dossier). ICC Publishing.

Malmberg, J. (2011) Posting post-Laval: Nordic responses. En Moreau, M. y Ulasiuk, I. (Eds). Before and After the Economic Crisis. What implications for the ‘European Social Model’? (págs. 25-39). Edward Elgar.

Meurkens, R. C. (2014) Punitive Damages – The Civil Remedy in American Law, Lessons and Caveats for Continental Europe. Wolter Kluwer Business.

Nagy, C.I. (2012) Recognition and enforcement of US judgments involving punitive damages in continental Europe. Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (NIPR), Vol. 30, No. 1, 4-11.

Nazzini, R. (2009). Potency and Act of the Principle of Effectiveness: The Development of Competition Law Remedies and Procedures in Community Law. En Barnard, C. y Odudu, O. (Eds), The Outer Limits of European Union Law (págs. 401-435). Hart Publishing.

Osterling, M. y García Long, S. (2019) Psicoeconomía de la cláusula penal. Revista de Actualidad Mercantil, No. 6, 142-171.

Owen, D. G. (1976) Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litigation. Michigan Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 7, 1257-1371.

Owen, David G. (1994) A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform. Villanova Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, 363-413.

Park, W. y Rogers, C. A. (2014). Third-party funding in international arbitration: The ICCA Queen-Marty Task Force. Penn State Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 42-2014, 1-10.

Pellegrini, A. (2001) De la “class action for damages” a la acción de clase brasileña. Ius Et Veritas, Vol. 23, 60-71.

Polinsky, A. M. (1980) Private versus public enforcement of fines. The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, 105-127.

Posner, Richard A. (2011) Regulation (Agencies) versus Litigation (Courts). An Analytical Framework. En Kessler, D. P. (Ed). Regulation vs. Litigation. Perspectives from Law and Economics (págs. 11-26). The University of Chicago Press.

Priest, G. L. (2000) Economics of Class Actions. Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship, paper 633, 481-486.

Rathod, J. y Vaheesan, S. (2015) The Arc and Architecture of Private Enforcement Regimes in the United States and Europe: A View across the Atlantic. University of New Hampshire Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, 303-375.

Richey, J. G. (2013) Tilted scales of justice? The consequences of third-party financing of American litigation. Emory Law Journal, Vol. 63, No. 2, 489-525.

Ríos Pizarro, C. (2017) ¿Tres son multitud? Algunas notas sobre el third party funding y su aplicación en arbitrajes comerciales. Ius et Veritas, No. 54, 236-243.

Rönnmar, M. (2010) Laval returns to Sweden: The Final Judgment of the Swedish Labour Court and Swedish Legislative Reforms. Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, 280-287.

Rubin, P. H. (2011) Third-party financing of litigation. Northern Kentucky Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 4, 673-686.

Sahani, V., Smith, M. y Deniger, C. (2018) Third-party financing in investment arbitration. En Beharry, C.L. (Ed.), Contemporary and emerging issues on the law of damages and valuation in international investment arbitration. Brill Nijhoff.

Scherer, M. (2013) Chapter 8. Third-party funding in international arbitration. Towards mandatory disclosure of funding agreements? En Cremades, B. y Dimolitsa, A. (Eds.), Third-party funding in international arbitration (ICC Dossier). ICC Publishing.

Scherer, M. y Goldsmith, A. (2012a) Third party funding in international arbitration in Europe: Part 1 – Funders’ perspectives. International Business Law Journal, Vol. 2012, No. 2, 207-220.

Scherer, M. y Goldsmith, A. (2012b) Third party funding of international arbitration proceedings – A view from Europe. Part II: The legal debate. International Business Law Journal, Vol. 2012, No. 6, 649-666.

Seidel, Selvyn (2013) Chapter 2. Third-party investing in international arbitration claims to invest or nor to invest? A daunting question. En Cremades, B. y Dimolitsa, A. (Eds.), Third-party funding in international arbitration (ICC Dossier). ICC Publishing.

Stiefel, E. C., Stürner, R. y Stadler, A. (1991) The Enforceability of Excessive U.S. Punitive Damage Awards in Germany. The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 39, No. 4, 779-802.

Subramanian, G. (2003) Bargaining in the shadow of takeover defenses. The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 113, No. 3, 621-686.

Szymanski, M. (8 de octubre de 2016) Recovery of third-party funding ordered by ICC tribunal and confirmed by the English High Court – An under-theorized area of the law. Kluwer Arbitration Blog.

Tolani, M. (2011) U.S. Punitive Damages before German Courts: A Comparative Analysis with respect to the Ordre Public. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 17, No. 1, 185-207.

Torres, Narghis (28 de septiembre de 2017) Should arbitration financing costs be granted to a party in an arbitration? Lex Finance. https://www.lex-finance.com/news/pdf/LEXLETTER-%20opinion%20CEO%20-%20ENG.pdf

Vanleenhove, C. (2017) Citizen’s participation through U.S. punitive damages: Should Europe embrace the concept of punitive damages in the enforcement of foreign judgments? En Appermont, N. y Cerulus, U. (Eds). Participatie van de burger in de rechtsorde. Participation du citoyen à l’ordre juridique (págs. 84-95). Die Keure.

Vanleenhove, C. (2017) Punitive damages in intellectual property law – a private international law outlook. En Petillion, F. (Ed). Handhaving van intellectuele rechten in België = Respect des droits intellectuels en Belgique – 10 jaar implementatie van de Europese richtlijn 2004/48/10 ans depuis la transposition de la directive européenne 2004/48 (págs. 203-221). Larcier.

Vargo, J. F. (1993) The American Rule on Attorney Fee Allocation: The Injured Person’s Access to Justice. The American University Law Review, Vol. 42, 1567-1636.

Viscusi, W. K. (2002) Overview. En Viscusi, W.P. (Ed.), Regulation through Litigation (págs. 1-21). AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.

Wegen, G. y Sherer, J. (1993) Germany: Federal Court of Justice Decision Concerning the Recognition and Enforcement of U.S. Judgments Awarding Punitive Damages. International Legal Materials, Vol. 32, No. 5, 1320-1346.

Wells, M. L. (2010) A Common Lawyer’s Perspective on the European Perspective on Punitive Damages. Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 70, No. 2, 557-577.

1Claramente, esto no quiere decir que no existan reglas legales pre-establecidas. Se trata de una sobre-simplificación para resaltar nuestra idea central, dado que es lo que se distingue de nuestro sistema civilista.

2Véase a Dawson (1968).

3Respecto a una clásica discusión en relación al enforcement en la experiencia americana, véase Becker y Stigler (1974); Landes y Posner (1975); Polinsky (1980); Friedman (1984).

4Véase a Vanleenhove (2017, p. 84); Tolani (2011, p. 205).

5Rathod y Vaheesan (2015, p. 313): “To promote effective private enforcement, governments must establish the proper incentives for parties to bring suits. Litigation can be a very costly undertaking so the expected benefits must be correspondingly large. A statutory private right of action is likely to be a dead letter if it imposes costly procedural burdens and provides for only modest recoveries for successful plaintiffs”.