Irena Sailer - Fixed Restorations

The introduction of 3D diagnostic imaging technologies and the corresponding implant-planning software packages has fundamentally changed and significantly improved pre-implantation diagnostics and planning.

1.4.8 Conclusions

The pretreatment diagnostics is a crucial step within the comprehensive restorative treatment, as it serves for better communication between the patient and the restorative team, and for the planning and execution of the respective treatment steps including the placement of dental implants. Until recently, pretreatment wax-ups and setups were made manually by the dental technician. Nowadays, the digital technology can be used for virtual diagnostics, and CAD/CAM technology helps in transferring this plan into clinical reality. An increase in efficiency and predictability by means of virtual diagnostics has been shown. Yet, availability of the technology, knowledge of its application, and high acquisition costs have to be considered with the virtual diagnostics.

1.4.9 References

1.Magne P, Magne M, Belser U. The diagnostic template: a key element to the comprehensive esthetic treatment concept. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:561–569.

2.Reshad M, Cascione D, Magne P. Diagnostic mock-ups as an objective tool for predictable outcomes with porcelain laminate veneers in esthetically demanding patients: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:333–339.

3.Simon H, Magne P. Clinically based diagnostic wax-up for optimal esthetics: the diagnostic mock-up. J Calif Dent Assoc 2008;36:355–362.

4.Coachman C, Calamita M. Digital smile design – a tool for treatment planning and communication in esthetic dentistry. QDT 2012;35:1–9.

5.Fradeani M. Evaluation of dentolabial parameters as Part of a comprehensive esthetic analysis. Eur J Esthet Dent 2006;1:62–69.

6.Couto Viana P, Correia A, Neves M, Kovacs Z, Nrugbauer R. Soft tissue waxup and mock-up as key factor in a treatment plan: case presentation. Eur J Esthet Dent 2012;7:310–323.

7.Salama M, Coachman C, Garber D, Calamita M, Salama H, Cabral G. Prosthetic gingival reconstruction in the fixed partial restoration. Part 2: diagnosis and treatment planning. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:573–581.

8.Kahng LS. Patient-dentist-technician communication within the dental team: using a colored treatment plan wax-up. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006;18:185–193; discussion 194–185.

9.van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3–12.

10.Schenk R. Biogeneric – another step closer to nature. Int J Comput Dent 2010;13:169–174.

11.Kurbad A, Kurbad S. Cerec smile design – a software tool for the enhancement of restorations in the esthetic zone. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:255–269.

12.Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44–56.

13.Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505–511.

14.Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010;5:335–341.

15.Cohen A, Laviv A, Berman P, Nashef R, Abu-Tair J. Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:661–666.

16.Sancho-Puchades M, Fehmer V, Hammerle C, Sailer I. Advanced smile diagnostics using CAD/CAM mock-ups. Int J Esthet Dent 2015;10:374–391.

17.Galhano GA, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JV. Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:e575–579.

18.Kwon HB, Park YS, Han JS. Augmented reality in dentistry: a current perspective. Acta Odontol Scand 2018;76: 497–503.

19.Sailer I, Liu S, Morzinger R, et al. Comparison of user satisfaction and image quality of fixed and mobile camera systems for 3-dimensional image capture of edentulous patients: a pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:520–524.

20.Xu W, Chatterjee A, Zollhofer M, et al. Mo(2)Cap(2): real-time mobile 3D motion capture with a cap-mounted fisheye camera. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 2019;25:2093–2101.

21.Zollhöfer Mea. State of the art on monocular 3D face reconstruction, tracking and applications. Computer Graphics Forum 2018;37:27.

22.Vavra P, Roman J, Zonca P, et al. Recent development of augmented reality in surgery: a review. J Healthc Eng 2017;2017:4574172.

23.Huang TK, Yang CH, Hsieh YH, Wang JC, Hung CC. Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) applied in dentistry. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2018;34:243–248.

24.Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:113–119.

25.Jepsen S, Berglundh T, Genco R, et al. Primary prevention of peri-implantitis: managing peri-implant mucositis. J Clin Periodontol 2015;42 Suppl 16:S152–157.

26.Sailer I, Muhlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 6:163–201.

27.Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Maslova N, Puriene A. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:71–76.

28.Wilson TG, Jr. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 2009;80:1388–1392.

29.Garber DA. The esthetic dental implant: letting restoration be the guide. J Oral Implantol 1996;22:45–50.

30.Kernen F, Benic GI, Payer M, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional printed templates for guided implant placement based on matching a surface scan with CBCT. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:762–768.

31.Van Assche N, Quirynen M. Tolerance within a surgical guide. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:455–458.

32.Schneider D, Schober F, Grohmann P, Hammerle CH, Jung RE. In-vitro evaluation of the tolerance of surgical instruments in templates for computer-assisted guided implantology produced by 3-D printing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26:320–325.

33.Benic GI, Muhlemann S, Fehmer V, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:777–782.

34.Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hammerle CHF, Muhlemann S. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118: 43–48.

Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.