In
n, the complex Euclidean inner product is defined by:
where v = ( v 1, v 2, . . . , v n), w = ( w 1, w 2, . . . , w n) ∈
nare written with their components in relation to any given, but fixed, basis
in
n.
The symbol
will be used throughout to represent either ℝ or
in the context of properties which are valid independently of the reality or complexity of the inner product.
THEOREM 1.1.– Let ( V , 〈 , 〉) be an inner product space. We have:
1) 〈 v , 0 V〉 = 0 ∀ v ∈ V ;
2) if 〈 u, w 〉 = 〈 v, w 〉 ∀ w ∈ V , then u and v must coincide;
3) 〈 v, w 〉 = 0 ∀ v ∈ V
w = 0 V, i.e. the null vector is the only vector which is orthogonal to all of the other vectors.
PROOF.–
1) 〈 v , 0 V〉 = 〈 v , 0 V+ 0 V〉 = 〈 v , 0 V〉 + 〈 v , 0 V〉 by linearity, i.e. 〈 v , 0 V〉 − 〈 v , 0 V〉 = 0 = 〈 v , 0 V〉.
2) 〈 u, w 〉 = 〈 v, w 〉 ∀ w ∈ V implies, by linearity, that 〈 u − v, w 〉 = 0 ∀ w ∈ V and thus, notably, considering w = u − v , we obtain 〈 u − v, u − v 〉 = 0, implying, due to the definite positiveness of the inner product, that u − v = 0 V, i.e. u = v .
3) If w = 0 V, then 〈 v, w 〉 = 0 ∀ v ∈ V using property (1). Inversely, by hypothesis, it holds that 〈 v, w 〉 = 0 = 〈 v , 0 V〉 ∀ v ∈ V , but then property (2) implies that w = 0 V.
Finally, let us consider a typical property of the complex inner product, which results directly from a property of complex numbers.
THEOREM 1.2.– Let ( V , 〈 , 〉) be a complex inner product space. Thus:
PROOF.– Consider any complex number z = a + ib , so − iz = b − ia , hence b = ℑ ( z ) = ℜ (− iz ). Taking z = 〈 v, w 〉, we obtain ℑ (〈 v, w 〉) = ℜ (− i 〈 v, w 〉) = ℜ (〈 v, iw 〉) by sesquilinearity.
1.2. The norm associated with an inner product and normed vector spaces
If ( V , 〈, 〉) is an inner product space over
, then a norm on V can be defined as follows:
Note that ‖ v ‖ is well defined since 〈 v, v 〉 ≽ 0 ∀ v ∈ V . Once a norm has been established, it is always possible to define a distance between two vectors v, w in V : d ( v, w ) = ‖ v − w ‖.
The vector v ∈ V such that ‖ v ‖= 1 is known as a unit vector . Every vector v ∈ V can be normalized to produce a unit vector, simply by dividing it by its norm.
Three properties of the norm, which should already be known, are listed below. Taking any v, w ∈ V , and any α ∈
:
1) ‖ v ‖≽ 0, ‖ v ‖= 0
v = 0 V;
2) ‖ αv ‖= | α |‖ v ‖(homogeneity);
3) ‖ v + w ‖≼ ‖ v ‖+ ‖ w ‖(triangle inequality).
DEFINITION 1.4 (normed vector space).– A normed vector space is a pair ( V , ‖ ‖) given by a vector space V and a function, called a norm ,
, satisfying the three properties listed above.
A norm ‖ ‖ is Hilbertian if there exists an inner product 〈 , 〉 on V such that
.
Canonically, an inner product space is therefore a normed vector space. Counterexamples can be used to show that the reverse is not generally true.
Note that, by definition, 〈 v, v 〉 = ‖ v ‖ ‖ v ‖, but, in general, the magnitude of the inner product between two different vectors is dominated by the product of their norms. This is the result of the well-known inequality shown below.
THEOREM 1.3 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality).– For all v, w ∈ ( V , 〈 , 〉) we have:
PROOF.– Dozens of proofs of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality have been produced. One of the most elegant proofs is shown below, followed by the simplest one:
– first proof : if w = 0 V, then the inequality is verified trivially with 0 = 0. If w ≠ 0 V, then we can define
, i.e.
and we note that:
Читать дальше