Almaz Braev - Maidan in Asia. Kazakhs and Arabs

To understand this process, the term flotagia appeared in revcon (a neologism from flotation and Refag. Refags are people with market reflection).

In the first stage, financial fascists support the young nation-states, whose young or conditionally young elite begins to squeeze out cultural former soviet intelligentsia so as they not to interfere with what is called democratic reforms (by injecting a catalyst of egoism into their heads). At the same time, leaving only their «savages» in power. This is reforms or whatever else, but the crisis of governance and the ideological desert are creeping up imperceptibly, but surely.

In the second stage, when enough has taken place through the gentle squeezing of rivals to forget about them, the ruling elite begins to remember, but also insist on obsolete anachronisms. The old history of the Middle Ages is ascending to the skies by local academics. That’s what the bourgeoisie and local people want in the end. These are just the laws of an old, obsolete law that has reanimated market catalysts. This means that in addition to the generic revival, antiquity generic mores should also be revived with some adjustment to the market and the world’s fascist financiers. Basically, it’s just the parliament building and similar structures, which are just large rooms where some people (parliamentarians) just sit and vote. With the revival of the law of old, all its new participants will use the words freedom and democracy by the fashion (this is just for fashion and for importance, catalysts unleash the language in one direction). There will also be a stock exchange next to the monumental administrative buildings. These fashionable words will not interfere with the resurgent tribal arrogance and belligerence. But to attack an invisible enemy, preparation is needed (while the catalyst excites)

Flotagia is a process when any action in the name of local nationalism leads to a deterioration of both nationalism itself and the conditions of existence of the traditional population. It is enough to look at the countries where nationalism has already been revived and is supported by financial fascists. Nationalism is such a zugzwang for regimes that at the first stage everything seems to be fine, everyone is pleased, but then every move of nationalism will be against the local rulers themselves. Every blow to the cultural traitors and heroes of the imperial and colonial past, like the same demolition of monuments, will revive militancy and make these peoples modern tribes because the main occupation of a tribal hunter is war. The world government also needs it, because it allows it to restrain the growth of the population of the cultural periphery.

Flotagia is the replacement of principles with petty egoisms of most of the provincials, who did not know these very principles and did not have time to understand what it is. There are no principles, there is no choice of means, there is a mad passion, a crazy passion to be like Europeans. But this imitation is of course mechanical and material in the beginning. Everyone wants to get rich quickly by imitating the elite

What is the danger of flotagia thus involving the archaic population in market relations?

The market materializes the archaic energy of competition and destruction.

Blood and kinship play a cruel joke with the archaic population. The same joke is taken under control by external forces. That is why radical Islamism and nationalism, for example, which are super-controlled from the outside, are dangerous.

If we talk about the Arabs of the Maghreb, they had to try everything. Nationalism or national socialism was adopted by many reform officers. But they didn’t know which side to choose – the West or the USSR? Before the Suez Canal crisis, Abdel Nasser was the best friend of the German National Socialists, who did not have time to escape to Argentina. Some of these «specialists» settled in Egypt. But it was the power and authority of the USSR that allowed these Arab socialists to talk about socialism in general. (I don’t know. Is the Ba’ath Party socialist, rather nationalist? Because the catalysts of socialism still excite local patriotism among the Zerefs. But the catalysts of socialism are still, closer to Zeref’s reflection, less harmful to Zerefs peoples than the catalysts of democracy)

If the current catalysts increase the capacity of life, then the population is growing rapidly like in Libya under Gaddafi, in Iraq under Hussein, in Egypt under Mubarek.

But all the leaders of Asia do not take into account one important thing.

The population is growing exponentially, and the benefits of maintaining the standard of living are arithmetic. But all the Zerefs want to dominate! At least to live with dignity and not be disgraced in front of relatives. (That’s why at weddings and commemorations, the zerefs mostly brag about where they work or where the children study. If children study in the USA, then it’s just great!) The socialist catalyst pours equality into the heads, and the democratic one – inequality. Which is better? The question is rhetorical. Although, the local native elite itself is constantly enriching itself, thereby irritating the crowd. Which is the main reason for the uprising (in Egypt, the Mubarak clan ruled for more than thirty years, which is all tired). People who don’t understand anything about democracy want to throw off this native elite so that the next tadpole becomes a frog (I use the evolution of a frog from caviar into a tadpole and a frog itself all the time in revcon. If you declare a tadpole a frog, it will still be a tadpole. But he will still become a frog, and not something else. The democratic catalyst and his laboratory assistants want the caviar to be democratic right away. It’s impossible. I hope this is clear now).

The outstanding boxer of our time, Meni Pacquiao, built several multi-storey houses for the poor at his own expense. Why did he do it? Because he’s a politician now. And perhaps the people of the Philippines will elect him president.

Without a democratic catalyst in the minds of Filipinos, it would have been impossible: for some fist-fighting expert to become president?

But you can say to Pacquiao. Pacquiao’s act of goodwill is a simultaneous act of populism from Pacquiao. After a while, children will be born again in this area, and a lot of children and the same problem will arise as if there was no Pacquiao, and he nothing did.

Of course, flotagia excites traditional people to breed (to fight?), but flotagia does not prepare officials at all. Zerefs, become officials and steal again, steal endlessly, like a hungry loader who got into a grocery warehouse.

Why do different crooks get into officials?

This is a different question and, in fact, a problem for my other book (which is being prepared).

Both democracy and socialism work with the lower classes all the time, where there is rapid reproduction. This is probably the scourge of all mankind. Tradition does not give a chance in the face of another aristocracy or local elite for the children of «commoners» to get to the top. So do the commoners themselves, who gained power as a result of the revolution and coups. They attach only their children and relatives to big money. Does caviar turn into a frog again?

Since the Maghreb, all modern Maidan events take place on the periphery of market civilization. At the end of the global financial pyramid. In the former USSR going so also, so today the Maidan is predictable in terms of the level of urbanization and sudden urbanization after the so-called market reforms and privatization. Look, who are the revolutionaries, leading in the name of human rights and democracy?