Almaz Braev - Elitism II. Socialist

The revolution is the very hole where all the conditional mice saw the passage to the room with the grain. One can imagine or assume that the counter-revolution penetrated not one by one but in a herd of mice. And the same mouse herd ate the collective stocks. The rest of the grain became unusable. The window to a bright future with the name “Socialism” at the entrance was covered with mouse shit. Well, who is to blame for this? When the building collapses, eaten by mice, there will naturally be accusers. Just as naturally, they will blame everything not on mice but temptations. Why cut such a hole? Who cut through it? Why was this socialism necessary at all? It only shattered such a beautiful palace, where everyone lived well. There was a lot of grain. And they would have spiked it. There are mice everywhere. It would be better for them to chew through small holes in their biographies, as is the case throughout the civilized world.

There is corruption everywhere. But not like ours. And in general, if there were no socialism, maybe there would be no oligarchy. Everything written on top is just the beginning of explaining how the nation is aging, how the younger sons of tradition turn into the older ones, not men, but mice. Into the conditional mice. After all, socialism in the form that took place still took place, but it was chewed through. Who? Why? The answers to these questions are possible only under one condition. They provided that the tradition and its tasks are considered. The only tradition wins because tradition relies on a physical majority. So far, this physical majority represents a minority of intellectuals. Then this minority becomes the majority thanks to the younger sons, who are disinherited under normal conditions. The younger sons will see their happiness in the happiness of all mankind will turn into revolutionaries and Red Army soldiers. Everything is consistent. The enemies will be defeated.

All paths are open (the window of a bright future will yawn with the alluring light for everyone, absolutely everyone, because everyone sees their private future in a general light). In theory, it should take only 25 years for the window to socialism to seem too large. That’s enough! There are few places, but everyone wants to. The aging of the revolution is generally instantaneous. And it does not take some 25 years and another 50 years for everyone to understand how a socialist internationalist brother turns into a nationalist brother. The nation of internationalists is turning into chauvinists. And there is no doubt that it takes two generations for a country nation to turn into radical egoist democrats. The evolutionary path in Europe and America has shown how high reflection is achieved. Only through the market does this transformation into National Socialists take place much faster (than through the hole of socialism in the wall of tradition).

The idea has great power! Therefore, do not touch the idealists. And even all the wives of the world should be forbidden to nag the brains of men. If you really still want to get into socialism. If you prefer not to get into socialism anymore, there is another option. But you probably won’t like it.

After the defeat of the Spanish Revolution in 1939, then after the victory over fascism and Japanese militarism in 1945, the Russian version of communism was imposed on the world. Russian communism, or Moscow communism, was actually a new Russian community. Despite the declared internationalism, everyone knew, the Russians themselves knew, that they were the fathers or older brothers of the new system. This sense of superiority persisted, at the very bottom – in the Russian people until the collapse of the USSR. However, the top of the overripe Politburo and the Central Committee tried in every possible way to appease the republics with spiritual internationalism and, most importantly, ideological materialism in the form of subsidies. Karl Marx could not have taken root in the Russian world, rather than in the form of a Russian “big brother”, which in fact was a rural kinship modified into an urban appearance. The former “rural” or national cadres of provincials, nurtured by the regime, also pretended for the time being. Then they suddenly remembered who they were. And so, it turned out that communism was liked by its totality precisely to the peoples – large communities. And it happened on the site of two empires – the former Mongol ulus, which turned from a horde to an empire thanks to hired cultural trappers, and the Qing Empire of the Middle Kingdom.

And in Asia, communism in the form of a community of younger brothers could not establish itself. The most obvious example is the flight exit from Afghanistan of a limited contingent of the Soviet Army. Islam opposes communism as a denomination everywhere globally, even in hierarchical Iran, where it might have a chance. On the territory of the former Arab Caliphate of the Ottoman Empire, such “rural communism” had no chance. All the younger brothers in Arab families found their socialism in the Muslim Ummah. If there is a chance of a revival of communism in another environment other than Russian and Chinese, although it seems that Marxism is supposedly triumphant in the PRC, (Nothing like that. In China, a modernized Confucian community under the guise of communism leads the people into the future. Although the people also agree to call their system communist), then Arab communism will be exclusively Muslim. And the Arabs will never agree to call their state communist. The Libyan Jamahiriya collapsed just from tribal squabbles of semi-nomadic elites. The former nomads settled in cities like Benghazi, but that didn’t make them Democrats or socialists. Such elites are generally difficult to define in a civilizational manner. But the imperial idea of dictatorship is constantly being replaced, first by the Russian idea and now by the Chinese version of communism. Communism marches around the world in the form of national-cultural dictatorships. This should already be clear to everyone. Are there any other questions? The physical majority of the population is used to collective life and dictatorship, to put it simply. If Marxists call these worlds communism, such Marxists will push their peoples to tragedy in advance. Fidel and Raul Castro (by the way, both younger sons in the Castro clan, that is, innate socialists) proved it. To them, you can add Ernesto Guevara, an Argentine revolutionist. He also denied the dictates of the Moscow bureaucracy. (Che Guevara was his father’s eldest son, as was Mao) That’s why Che and Mao became friends in absentia. Nowhere in Marx is it written that the peasantry can be progressive. But the Chinese leader wrote that the peasantry could “encircle the cities,” and the Argentine thought that a handful of fighters would stir up a revolution in Bolivia. There is one but. If Che had won, made a revolution in Argentina, and the Castro brothers would have been his comrades. Then, by analogy with the tragedy of Bolshevism in Russia, he would have had to repress his brothers. He was the eldest son. Fighting against the Peron regime, he fled to Mexico, then ended up in Cuba, in a foreign land. He no longer wanted to grow old in Cuba and turn into a pot-bellied bureaucrat. So, he went away young and holy. This saved him from a showdown with the Castro brothers.

So, the imperial totality cannot live in a small republic or on an island except as an idea. Ideologically, in the same Cuba, they could recognize the communist idea, but they could not translate it into a harsh dictatorship. There are enough showdowns of warring factions to call for discipline in a small country: enough authority, charisma of one man. When Castro went to the Camaguey barracks unguarded against the Catholics of Comandante Matos, Trotsky also took the Peter and Paul Fortress garrison without firing near in time of the October Revolution. And Stalin’s police officers at once could not bring him to Alma – Ata in January 1928 because of his great authority. Stalin went to the deception. They announced the postponement of the time of the train departure.