Almaz Braev - Tradition against communism. Explanation of the defeat

Young people are not interested in their past life, its rules, and customs. The old morals are like fences for keeping cattle, and the laws are like the enclosure of a circus cage, in which young people walk like wolves from corner to corner. The young must always make themselves known to prove to the old generation that they are better than their fathers. They are not interested in life according to the laws of their fathers. We are not talking about the self-realization of the social bottom. There everything is obvious: home, food, rest, and offspring. Only the rich people can afford to self as "to save the world". Or destroy it to create a new, better, brighter life. This is how our Remids 2 come into conflict with their fathers. And Remids 3 or the third generation of urbanized citizens just have to do it. Something is not born out of anything but comes out of a dream. They are Zerefs, and the traditional people have no time to dream. The burghers of Zeremids also do not have enough time. They have a lot to do in the stores. They need to buy and sell goods.

Remids against Remids.

The ability to sell or buy has always been popular among the townspeople. The burghers loved money because they were always short of it. It was the bourgeois who later became the most grown rich of the peasants. Burghers, as well as peasants, wish their children a good, rich future. In Russia, small nobles fell ill with liberalism or bourgeois diseases. Small nobles were also ruined. They also became almost bourgeois. Although they always remembered belonging to a noble family. Of course, they also got sick of feudal. It is difficult to live in a feudal society. The noble looks at the rootless man with arrogance. The rich bourgeois despises beggars on the street. Even a poor nobleman knows that he is superior to any bourgeois. That’s why many people have become ill with democracy. This disease was also transmitted to young people. So young people went against their fathers. The liberal currents matured in parallel with the socialist ones. All these contradictions, the struggle of fathers and children or the struggle of generations, will result in the great Russian Revolution in half a century. It is necessary to carefully look here only who will be against whom.

Let's consider the left-center of the Russian Revolution and its representatives-the cadets (constitutional Democrats)

Milyukov P. N.

His Father was Nikolai Pavlovich Milyukov (1826—1878 / 79), an architect who came from a noble family. The leader of the cadets, P. N. Milyukov, gave private lessons as a student after the death of his father to provide for his family. He was left at the University to prepare for a professorship.

Muromtsev S. A.

Father-Andrey Alekseevich Muromtsev 1818 -1879, Colonel, the officer of the lifeguards of the Moscow regiment, then commander of the 2nd Grenadier reserve regiment, landowner Muromtsev Jr. in 1884 was dismissed from the university for political unreliability. He came from a noble family. He was recorded in the noble genealogical books of the Tula and Vladimir provinces. And why? His contemporaries write about him: "an Honest and morally scrupulous man, Muromtsev always carefully studied the case materials. And if he had any doubts about the authenticity of the documents, he usually refused to defend himself, although he was offered a large reward." Here is a man who is improving his reflection. (this is a super person for Revcon).

Kokoshkin F. F:

From an ancient noble family, whose ancestor, according to legend, was Duke. His grandfather is a famous playwright. The father, Fyodor, the court counselor, Commissioner for peasant Affairs in the Hilltown of Lublin province, an official for special assignments at the Ministry of national education, a connoisseur of literature and art, and most importantly – a simple genial and warmhearted never display your intellectual superiority, so usually the people of his caliber. Another characteristic of him: "when he was ill with tuberculosis, he endured his illness extremely cheerfully. He could protect his health so that others did not notice it, was always cheerful and worked much more than the average healthy person as if rushing to do as much as possible in the short period of life allotted to him by fate." These are people who are playing with their fate. A plate of soup is not enough for them. Revcon is sure that such people will not betray their ideals because of sausage. Because only the bourgeoisie loses their ideals for the sausage. They will not indulge in pleasures, gluttony, and perversions. These are great examples for their sons. Therefore, the Remids 3 would be their moral copy. The Apple doesn't fall far from the tree…

Now consider the radical tilt of the victorious revolutionaries.

Lenin, V. I.

Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov was born in the family of Ilya Nikolaevich Ulyanov, an inspector of public schools in the Simbirsk province, the son of a former serf of the village (Zeremid).

Trotsky LD.

Leyba Bronstein is from the family of a rich landowner-landlord from among the Jewish colonists of the Kherson province.

Stalin I. V.

Father-Vissarion (Beso) came from the peasants of Didi-Lilo village, Tiflis province, by profession – a shoemaker (Zeref). Prone to drunkenness and fits of rage, he severely beat the mother of little Soso. When Soso was eleven years old, Vissarion "died in a drunken brawl – someone stabbed him with a knife." By then, Soso himself was spending a lot of time in the street company of Gori's young hooligans.

Of course, it is obvious that Lenin and Trotsky (Remides 2) came into conflict directly and indirectly with their fathers. Stalin (Zeref) did not come into conflict with anyone. In reflection, he remained like a domineering father. Methodology Revcon of remedy 2 – Lenin and Trotsky, along with other revolutionaries' victory over the liberal democratic current, over Remids in the third generation, then lost the political arena to Zeremids or children of children of the petty bourgeoisie (cooks and cobblers). It should be said that representatives of the people-zerefs-will do not steal in a state of strict control of the Russian community, although their Zeref reflexes are always strongly expressed in their blood. When the community's morals are strong, thieves, traitors, and rats will be dealt with briefly and harshly. The feudal community severely punishes thieves. But when the Zerefs break away from the community, break away from the people, they first get small and low burghers, then thieving officials, if the revolution raises them to the administration. The heroes of Turgenev's novel "nihilists" in the person of Bazarov turn into Narodniks, terrorists, and anarchists.

But where did the impudent privatizers, who do not recognize any boundaries of decency, come from in the USSR?

The second "people's" generation or Remids 2 from the Zeremids (from the" rotten intelligentsia") blindly copy the experience of their ancestors-to steal and run away, but also hypocritically obey the Charter of the Communists (the Russian community). Peacetime, a time of loosening discipline – a good time to mature from Remids 2 future hypocrites. Remids 2, if there is no war and discipline falls – this is half of today and half of yesterday's state. Are there any super people among them? Sure. When the community's morals are alive, reprisals are near and imminent, for example, in the Second World war. The people performed feats. The sons of peoples-Zerefs died as heroes-honor and praise to them! Eternal memory them of all descendants. But at this very time, the people's officials of the USSR are growing up children pioneers. Later, they will become Komsomol members and want Russian liberalism and democracy.

The Remids all are the real socialists (Remeds 2). They are strong Komsomol members and ardent activists. They are” a worthy change of fathers.” But we already know who comes to take ready-made; these are lying fanatics. These are hypocritical activists. These are hypocritical performers of the Communist rite. These are the Pharisees. This is performing the rite when there is no war and discipline falls and corrupts them. They don’t feel the tension of their fathers’ time. This is a new revolt of sons against fathers. So, they are ready-made liberals and disgusting hypocrites.