Almaz Braev - The Third. Covid liberalism

So, unlike the Russians in 1917, the Germans preferred the right-wing statists-the Nazis. Although, the success of the Russian Zerefs was before the eyes of the whole world. And the German Communist party was not a small one. And where else did Marx’s teaching receive the approval of peoples and development? We will say immediately, pursuing the reason for the choice of the German people. But why? Everyone knows that the dictatorship of the proletariat in various forms of its understanding and interpretation took root only in underdeveloped agricultural countries, and to be more precise – in Asia. In Asia, the word despotism was more consonant with dictate.

From the history of the development of all social systems in the world (and from Engels), we know that the state can be where there is property. The most important owner and his vassals dictated where there was no property, and no one could confirm their capabilities.

Even the comparison and evidence of the backwardness of the future Communist communities does not clarify the specifics. Yes, more technically underdeveloped. Yes, the culture has more emotions and a tilt towards mythology. Rational people do not believe in fairy tales at all. And traditional ones avoid rationality. Rational and meticulous Marxism appealed to the traditional peoples not by its content but by its completion. At which the end of the Marxist teaching good overcomes evil, there was a coincidence of myth and Marxism, and they met without logic for love.

But did the Germans abandon the tradition?

No, the Germans did not abandon the tradition. They remained loyal to their German state. Do you think that the ancient castes were abandoned in the rational, cold world of property and money? No way. The teaching of the Revcon says from the very beginning: the traditional (the Zeref) world has no semitones. The world of citizenship, the market, and money have many such halftones. They are like rubber shock absorbers, spacers between strata, cellophane with bubbles-they soften the relationship of superiority and humiliation. In the bourgeois world, it is not clear who is the master and who is his servant. Outside, everyone is walking the same way. Only very fine details are visible to old-timers and professionals. Castes are everywhere. The details and signals of the elite have stopped shouting and are located outside so that a hundred steps away, you can see who is who. Among primitive peoples, all the virtues are shown by clothing and drawn on the face.

The Germans remained true to the tradition of German semitones. They did not turn over their social pyramid. They didn’t destroy their middle class.

The Remids are simply fanatics of the state. German revolutionaries, German waves of indignation, approached the Remids just as the Russian peasants approached their landlords in a tight line. But they (the German middle class) were not liquidated, beaten to death, or stabbed. The German Remids, these German fanatics of Germany, the second Holy Roman Empire, and state, seemed familiar to them. They saw themselves in them, but eventually, the Zerefs become Zeremids, the Zeremids become Remids, everything is consistent and evolutionary. Even in reflection. (Who is this teacher or doctor? His great-grandfather or grandfather was also a peasant, and his father was a Philistine. A doctor and a teacher are successful careers. Well, a modern state cannot exist without them).

In the countries of the age-old despotism, the pyramid is reversed radically. There is no gradualness, but there is a jump. In addition, the proletarians did not come to lawyers, doctors, and teachers for advice. And the doctors and teachers tell them silently about the great state with their lips. They were a pitiful, defenseless lot, just as clenched and disenfranchised.

In addition, they destroyed them if excited peasants came to the feudal lords, and they did not agree. What kind of peasant revolt is it? The meaningless and merciless… as the poet Pushkin called the Russian revolt.

Suppose we look at the facts. Then the new leaders of the workers cut out the “exploiters” as the Eastern despots, but not vice versa. Not the feudal despots cut peasant uprising of peasants, as it was not once but many times over the centuries, but now the Marxist leaders cut all feudal lords. They change places. The results of local evolution were carved with feudal precision. This is not only evident in Stalin’s repressions. Look at the exploits of the revolutionaries in Kampuchea. All the local intelligentsia, more or less educated people, were cut out at the root. Even the bespectacled, the person who wears glasses was the enemy.

Remids-statesmen cannot be destroyed. The middle class can’t be touched.

Suppose this happened under Marxism or at the direction of the leader of the Asian peasantry. Then they, like the Hydra, will have to replace the severed heads. Instead of demolished ones, put your own. But the whole problem is that the state will lose from the new evolution. The newly raised heads of the officials will look in the wrong direction. Not in the direction of state property, but in the direction of oneself. The idea of a new state in executing upstarts or blanks to manufacture the old form is doomed from the very beginning. For the fate of the state, this means failure. But now, there is only the body of the state and the eternally hungry heads of officials. But why are they always hungry?

Glossary:

Zeref- a traditional person with rigidly set social actions, low reflection almost zero, hence the word zeref-reflection zero (zeref)). Has no semitones, serves the idols of the genus, communicates in the circle of native blood. Zeref has no semitones of perception, is categorical, irreconcilable, hostile to others and to another opinion in the development of rejection of “not your own”

Zeref’s loop – the baby boom, overheating of the population.

Zerot- the traditional feudal elite

Zerot’s loop creates a solid cast, impenetrable social barriers. None of the lower castes can enter the feudal elite – the lack of social mobility pre-revolutionary situation.

Remid – a new traditional elite, rulers, officials, authorities, teachers; Remid put actions for Zerefs, determine morality, laws, politics, reflection average-middle (remiddle).

Remid’s loop – the elite’s struggle with the brightest personality, the cooperation of second and third parties against the hero and the prophet.

Refag is a person of a trading civilization in several generations; reflection is high, selfish, utilitarian-refag (re + high).

Zeremid is a first-generation city person, has a half-rigid social reflex of custom and new skills of city life, half-urban, half-rural.

Zeremid’s loop – the Zeremids are approximate imitators. They imitate the elite, any idea, any direction just to be good for their families. Imitation, hypocrisy, and fanaticism harm any cause, state, or idea – the first generation of the tradition after industrial modernization.

Zefa is a man from the city’s first generation with a tendency towards the market and speculation, and to trade at least something, he was forced by circumstances.

Revcon – revolution conservatism

When German Zerefs and Zeremids turned to their authority figures – evolutionary examples of how no one became someone: a doctor, a teacher, a lawyer – what were they told? Although they never communicated, I will assume here, for discussion, that they did – and that the doctors, teachers, and lawyers did have something to tell those following in their footsteps. How did this German solidarity come about?

All those doctors, teachers, and lawyers (not to mention the small merchants and street vendors defined in Marxism) were the bourgeoisie (also defined in Marxism). Or the middle class, as we call it today. So, who approached them, and why?