Josh Rogin - Chaos Under Heaven

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Josh Rogin - Chaos Under Heaven» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Год выпуска: 2021, ISBN: 2021, Издательство: HMH Books, Жанр: Старинная литература, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Chaos Under Heaven: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Chaos Under Heaven»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

The behind-the-scenes story of America's chaotic, high-stakes confrontation with Beijing, from an award-winning *Washington Post* columnist and peerless observer of the U.S.-China relationship. The war began as soon as Donald Trump won the presidency. In an attempt to shape the president-elect's stance toward China, Henry Kissinger began arranging secret meetings between incoming officials and Chinese leaders. Soon, factions in the new administration were battling to shape the U.S. strategy toward China, and with it the future of the most important relationship of the 21st century. The resulting chaos would not only lead Washington and Beijing into a trade war that would reshape international economics and push the two countries to the brink of a Cold War. It also would bring to a boil the long-simmering rivalry between Washington and Beijing, and force a reckoning over China's audacious influence operations within the United States --a competition between...

Chaos Under Heaven — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Chaos Under Heaven», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

222 raised concerns: Mihir Zaveri, “Wary of Chinese Espionage, Houston Cancer Center Chose to Fire 3 Scientists,” New York Times, April 22, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/22/health/md-anderson-chinese-scientists.html.

223 claimed ignorance: Sui-Lee Wee, “China Uses DNA to Track Its People, with the Help of American Expertise,” New York Times, February 21, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/business/china-xinjiang-uighur-dna-thermo-fisher.html.

223 MIT had announced: Adam Conner-Simons, “CSAIL Launches New Five-Year Collaboration with IFlyTek,” MIT News, June 15, 2018, https://news.mit.edu/2018/csail-launches-five-year-collaboration-with-iflytek-0615.

223 after reports accused: Will Knight, “MIT Cuts Ties with a Chinese AI Firm amid Human Rights Concerns,” Wired, April 21, 2020, https://www.wired.com/story/mit-cuts-ties-chinese-ai-firm-human-rights/.

223 is collaborating with: Madhumita Murgia and Christian Shepherd, “Western AI Researchers Partnered with Chinese Surveillance Firm,” Financial Times, April 19, 2019, https://www.ft.com/content/41be9878-61d9-11e9-b285-3acd5d43599e.

223 working to automate: Paul Mozur, “One Month, 500,000 Face Scans: How China Is Using A.I. to Profile a Minority, New York Times, April 14, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/technology/china-surveillance-artificial-intelligence-racial-profiling.html.

224 began a sweep: Kate O’Keeffe and Aruna Viswanatha, “FBI Sweep of China Researchers Leads to Cat-and-Mouse Tactics,” Wall Street Journal, September 7, 2020, https://www.wsj.com/articles/fbi-sweep-of-china-researchers-leads-to-cat-and-mouse-tactics-11599471001.

226 Soon it leaked: Paul Mozur and Jane Perlez, “China Bets on Sensitive U.S. Start-Ups, Worrying the Pentagon,” New York Times, March 22, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/technology/china-defense-start-ups.html.

226 The full report: Michael Brown and Pavneet Singh, China’s Technology Transfer Strategy: How Chinese Investments in Emerging Technology Enable a Strategic Competitor to Access the Crown Jewels of U.S. Innovation (Defense Innovation Unit Experimental, January 2018), 48.

227 launched a public attack: Peter Thiel, “Good for Google, Bad for America,” New York Times, August 1, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/01/opinion/peter-thiel-google.html.

227 “ take a look”: “Remarks by President Trump in Cabinet Meeting,” White House, July 16, 2019, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-cabinet-meeting-14/.

227 Mnuchin announced: Bowdeya Tweh, “Treasury Secretary Finds No Security Concerns with Google Work in China,” Wall Street Journal, July 24, 2019, https://www.wsj.com/articles/treasury-secretary-finds-no-security-concerns-with-google-work-in-china-11563976459.

227 Trump tweeted: Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump), “@sundarpichai of Google was in the Oval Office working very hard to explain how much he liked me, what a great job the Administration is doing, that Google was not involved with China’s military, that they didn’t help Crooked Hillary over me in the 2016 Election, & that they . . . ,” Twitter, August 6, 2019, 10:51 a.m., https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1158797732821291018.

227 on multiple occasions: Alex Joske, “The Chinese Military’s Exploitation of Western Tech Firms,” Strategist, April 11, 2019, https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/the-chinese-militarys-exploitation-of-western-tech-firms/.

227 according to the testimony: Gordon G. Chang, “U.S. Must Put a Ban on Google Helping China Develop a Global Digital Dictatorship,” Daily Beast, March 26, 2019, https://www.thedailybeast.com/google-snubbed-the-pentagonbut-not-the-chinese-military.

228 reorient Facebooks approach: Josh Rogin, “Facebook Wakes Up to the China Challenge,” Washington Post, October 24, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/facebook-wakes-up-to-the-china-challenge/2019/10/24/ae5b2fcc-f69f-11e9-8cf0-4cc99f74d127_story.html.

228 “ to other countries”: Tony Romm, “Zuckerberg: Standing for Voice and Free Expression,” Washington Post, October 17, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/10/17/zuckerberg-standing-voice-free-expression/.

229 “ key money”: Josh Rogin, “Trump’s TikTok Deal Would Only Make the Problem Worse,” Washington Post, September 24, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/trumps-tiktok-deal-would-only-make-the-problem-worse/2020/09/24/3b418b7c-fe9f-11ea-8d05-9beaaa91c71f_story.html.

230 move its data: Nick Statt, “Apple’s iCloud Partner in China Will Store User Data on Servers of State-Run Telecom,” Verge, July 18, 2018, https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/18/17587304/apple-icloud-china-user-data-state-run-telecom-privacy-security.

230 granting Beijing’s demands: Washington Post Editorial Board, “Apple Accedes to China’s Despotic Demands,” Washington Post, October, 15, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-costs-of-apples-business-in-china/2019/10/15/8a038dde-ef85-11e9-89eb-ec56cd414732_story.html.

230 Global Times would report: Stephen Warwick, “China Threatens Apple with Investigations and Restrictions in Response to U.S. Treatment of Huawei,” iMore, May 15, 2020, https://www.imore.com/china-threatens-companies-apple-investigations-and-restrictions-response-treatment-huawei.

231 In its 2017 report: 2017 Report to Congress of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission (Washington, DC: US Government Publishing Office, November 2017), 73. https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/annual_reports/2017_Annual_Report_to_Congress.pdf.

231 that went bad: Walter Pavlo, “Fraud in Chinese Reverse Mergers on American Exchanges—and We’re Surprised?,” Forbes, April 8, 2011, https://www.forbes.com/sites/walterpavlo/2011/04/08/fraud-in-chinese-reverse-mergers-on-american-exchanges-and-were-surprised/.

231 memorandum of understanding: “PCAOB Enters into Enforcement Cooperation Agreement with Chinese Regulators,” Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, May 24, 2013, https://pcaobus.org:443/News/Releases/Pages/05202013_ChinaMOU.aspx.

232 raised $25 billion: Aaron Timms, “Deals of the Year 2014: Alibaba Sets IPO Record with NYSE Debut,” Institutional Investor, December 10, 2014, https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b14zbh3xzm35m3/deals-of-the-year-2014-alibaba-sets-ipo-record-with-nyse-debut.

232 The China Hustle: Josh Rogin, “It’s Time to End the ‘China Hustle’ on U.S. Stock Exchanges,” Washington Post, August 30, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/its-time-to-end-the-china-hustle-on-us-stock-exchanges/2018/08/30/50137c1a-ac8d-11e8-8a0c-70b618c98d3c_story.html.

233 “ Chinese government”: Mike Bird, “How China Pressured MSCI to Add Its Market to Major Benchmark,” Wall Street Journal, February 3, 2019, https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-china-pressured-msci-to-add-its-market-to-major-benchmark-11549195201.

234 MSCI quadrupled: Asjylyn Loder, “Indexes to Unleash Flood of Money into Chinese Stocks,” Wall Street Journal, May 16, 2019, https://www.wsj.com/articles/indexes-to-unleash-flood-of-money-into-chinese-stocks-11558006200.

234 sent about $80 billion: Michael Wursthorn and Shen Hong, “Chinese Shares Gain Global Sway Thanks to Index Firm’s Move,” Wall Street Journal, March 1, 2019, https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-shares-gain-global-sway-thanks-to-index-firms-move-11551392626.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Chaos Under Heaven»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Chaos Under Heaven» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Chaos Under Heaven»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Chaos Under Heaven» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x