Gastrointestinal Surgical Techniques in Small Animals

Recently, use of directional or barbed suture materials have been documented in gastrointestinal procedures ( Table 2.1) (Hansen and Monnet 2012; Erhart et al. 2013). Barbed sutures are manufactured by making small cuts in the surface of smooth suture, creating spurs. They are specifically designed to be used in continuous suture patterns. The barbs catch within collagenous tissue as each suture pass is taken. Unlike conventional sutures, previously placed tissue bites grab and remain secure in tissue, spreading tension throughout the line. Intestinal anastomosis performed with the unidirectional barbed suture seems to have a higher leakage pressure than anastomosis performed with regular monofilament sutures (Hansen and Monnet 2012). Each suture pass cannot “back out” due to the directional barbs. These sutures make it possible to secure a suture line without a knot. The suture is placed through a loop at the beginning of the suture line and then at the end of the suture line for gastrointestinal surgery two extra bites are made at 180° to lock the suture.

Barbed sutures have tensile strength comparable to their unbarbed equivalents when factoring size by their inner diameter at the depth of the barb cut versus outer diameter of conventional suture (Arbaugh et al. 2013; Ferrer‐Marquez and Belda‐Lorano 2009).

Both unidirectional suture and bidirectional sutures are available. Unidirectional sutures have a loop at one end and a needle on the other. The first needle bite is taken in tissue, and instead of creating a knot, the needle is passed through the loop to secure the end. With bidirectional barbed sutures, barbs are cut toward each end, starting mid‐strand with needles swaged on both ends.

Barbed sutures are more efficient to place than conventional sutures. They have been documented to reduce operative time and in some cases intraoperative bleeding, likely due to maintained consistent tightness throughout the continuous suture line. When used on hollow viscera, bursting pressures were comparable between barbed suture lines and conventional ones (Hansen and Monnet 2012; Erhart et al. 2013). Comparable outcomes following gastric, enteric, and biliary duct repairs using barbed suture have been reported (Denyttenaera et al. 2009). When using barbed suture for intra‐abdominal visceral repair, the exposed rough suture end from the final pass can create adhesion formation and possibly adjacent tissue erosion. It is recommended when terminating barbed suture placed for viscera, two final needle passes in opposing directions should be completed and the end should be cut short against the tissue to avoid excessive adhesion formation.

Table 2.2 Suture, staple recommendations for GI surgery in small animals.

NA = Not Applicable.