Communicating Science in Times of Crisis

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis» — ознакомительный отрывок электронной книги совершенно бесплатно, а после прочтения отрывка купить полную версию. В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Жанр: unrecognised, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Communicating Science in Times of Crisis: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

Learn more about how people communicate during crises with this insightful collection of resources  In 
, distinguished academics and editors H. Dan O’Hair and Mary John O’Hair have delivered an insightful collection of resources designed to shed light on the implications of attempting to communicate science to the public in times of crisis. Using the recent and ongoing coronavirus outbreak as a case study, the authors explain how to balance scientific findings with social and cultural issues, the ability of media to facilitate science and mitigate the impact of adverse events, and the ethical repercussions of communication during unpredictable, ongoing events. 
The first volume in a set of two, 
 isolates a particular issue or concern in each chapter and exposes the difficult choices and processes facing communicators in times of crisis or upheaval. The book connects scientific issues with public policy and creates a coherent fabric across several communication studies and disciplines. The subjects addressed include: 
A detailed background discussion of historical medical crises and how they were handled by the scientific and political communities of the time Cognitive and emotional responses to communications during a crisis Social media communication during a crisis, and the use of social media by authority figures during crises Communications about health care-related subjects Data strategies undertaken by people in authority during the coronavirus crisis Perfect for communication scholars and researchers who focus on media and communication, 
 also has a place on the bookshelves of those who specialize in particular aspects of the contexts raised in each of the chapters: social media communication, public policy, and health care.

Communicating Science in Times of Crisis — читать онлайн ознакомительный отрывок

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

196 Swami, V., Furnham, A., Smyth, N., Weis, L., Lay, A., & Clow, A. (2016, September). Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.084

197 Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Zafar, N., & Alrasheedy, M. (2019, November). Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 51, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.026

198 Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2017). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143

199 Törnberg, P. (2018). Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion. PLoS ONE, 13(9), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203958

200 Torres, R., Gerhart, N. & Negahban, A. (2018, January). Combating fake news: An investigation of information verification behaviors on social networking sites. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3976–3985. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50387

201 Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018, March). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. William + Flora Hewlett Foundation. https://www.hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Social-Media-Political-Polarization-and-Political-Disinformation-Literature-Review.pdf

202 Twenge, J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2020). Declines in non-digital social interaction among Americans, 2003–2017. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6(1), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12665

203 Twenge, J., Spitzberg, B. H., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Less in-person social interaction with peers among U.S. adolescents in the 21st century and links to loneliness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1892–1913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519836170

204 Twenge, J. M., Martin, G., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2019). Trends in U.S. adolescents’ media use, 1976–2015: The rise of the Internet, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(4), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000203

205 UNESCO. (2018). Journalism, ‘fake news’ & disinformation. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://en.unesco.org/fightfakenews

206 Uscinski, J. E. (2018). The study of conspiracy theories. Argumenta, 3(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.23811/53.arg2017.usc

207 Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Funchion, J., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. (2020, April 28). Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories? The Harvard Kennedy School, Misinformation Review, 1. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-015

208 Van Heekeren, M. (2020). The curative effect of social media on fake news: A historical re-evaluation. Journalism Studies, 21(3), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1642136

209 van Prooijen, J. (2016). Sometimes inclusion breeds suspicion: Self‐uncertainty and belongingness predict belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2157

210 van Prooijen, J. (2017). Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3301

211 van Prooijen, J., & Acker, M. (2015). The influence of control on belief in conspiracy theories: Conceptual and applied extensions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3161

212 van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 897–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2530

213 Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science (New York, N.Y.), 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559

214 Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020). Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: Using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication, 37(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1716500

215 Walczyk, J. J., Harris, L. L., Duck, T. K., & Mulay, D. (2014, August). A social-cognitive framework for understanding serious lies: Activation-decision-construction-action theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.03.001

216 Waldrop, M. M. (2017). The genuine problem of fake news: Intentionally deceptive news has co-opted social media to go viral and influence millions. Science and technology can suggest why and how. But can they offer solutions? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(48), 12631–12634. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719005114

217 Wang, R., He, Y., Xu, J., & Zhang, H. (2020). Fake news or bad news? Toward an emotion-driven cognitive dissonance model of misinformation diffusion. Asian Journal of Communication, 30(5), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2020.1811737

218 Ward, C., & Voas, D. (2011). The emergence of conspirituality. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 26(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2011.539846

219 Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2018). In Journalism, ‘fake news’ and disinformation (Handbook for journalism education and training). UNESCO. https://bit.ly/2MuELY5

220 Weiss, A. P., Alwan, A., Garcia, E. P., & Garcia, J. (2020). Surveying fake news: Assessing university faculty’s fragmented definition of fake news and its impact on teaching critical thinking. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 16(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0049-x

221 Wood, M. J. (2017). Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs in conspiracy theories: Implications for theory and measurement. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12231

222 Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2015, June). Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2015.00836

223 Xia, Y., Lukito, J., Zhang, Y., Wells, C., Kim, S. J., & Tong, C. (2019). Disinformation, performed: Self-presentation of a Russian IRA account on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1646–1664. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1621921

224 Xian, J., Yang, D., Pan, L., Wang, W., & Wang, Z. (2019). Misinformation spreading on correlated multiplex networks. Chaos, 29(11), 113123–1–10. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121394

225 Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2011). Product-related deception in e-commerce: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043494

226 Zannettou, S., Caulfield, T., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Sirivianos, M., Sringhini, G., & Suarez-Tangil, G. (2018). On the origins of memes by means of fringe web communities. Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference 2018, 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278532.3278550

227 Zimmer, F., Scheibe, K., Stock, M., & Stock, W. G. (2019). Fake news in social media: Bad algorithms or biased users? Journal of Information Science Theory & Practice (JISTaP), 7(2), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2019.7.2.4

228 Zollo, F. (2019). Dealing with digital misinformation: A polarised context of narratives and tribes. EFSA Journal, 17(S1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170720

229 Zollo, F., Novak, P. K., Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Mozetič, I., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015). Emotional dynamics in the age of misinformation. PLoS ONE, 10(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138740

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x