Communicating Science in Times of Crisis

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis» — ознакомительный отрывок электронной книги совершенно бесплатно, а после прочтения отрывка купить полную версию. В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Жанр: unrecognised, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Communicating Science in Times of Crisis: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

Learn more about how people communicate during crises with this insightful collection of resources  In 
, distinguished academics and editors H. Dan O’Hair and Mary John O’Hair have delivered an insightful collection of resources designed to shed light on the implications of attempting to communicate science to the public in times of crisis. Using the recent and ongoing coronavirus outbreak as a case study, the authors explain how to balance scientific findings with social and cultural issues, the ability of media to facilitate science and mitigate the impact of adverse events, and the ethical repercussions of communication during unpredictable, ongoing events. 
The first volume in a set of two, 
 isolates a particular issue or concern in each chapter and exposes the difficult choices and processes facing communicators in times of crisis or upheaval. The book connects scientific issues with public policy and creates a coherent fabric across several communication studies and disciplines. The subjects addressed include: 
A detailed background discussion of historical medical crises and how they were handled by the scientific and political communities of the time Cognitive and emotional responses to communications during a crisis Social media communication during a crisis, and the use of social media by authority figures during crises Communications about health care-related subjects Data strategies undertaken by people in authority during the coronavirus crisis Perfect for communication scholars and researchers who focus on media and communication, 
 also has a place on the bookshelves of those who specialize in particular aspects of the contexts raised in each of the chapters: social media communication, public policy, and health care.

Communicating Science in Times of Crisis — читать онлайн ознакомительный отрывок

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

163 Rampersad, G., & Althiyabi, T. (2020). Fake news: Acceptance by demographics and culture on social media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1686676

164 Raspe, L. (2004). The Black Death in Jewish sources. Jewish Quarterly Review, 94(3), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2004.0001

165 Reyna, V. F. (2020). A scientific theory of gist communication and misinformation resistance, with implications for health, education, and policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912441117

166 Romer, D. & Jamieson, K. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine, 263(113356), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356

167 Rommer, D., Majerova, J., & Machova, V. (2020). Repeated COVID-19 pandemic-related media consumption: Minimizing sharing of nonsensical misinformation through health literacy and critical thinking. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 19, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.22381/LPI1920207

168 Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 521–562. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1

169 Rubin, V. L. (2019). Disinformation and misinformation triangle: A conceptual model for “fake news” epidemic, causal factors and interventions. Journal of Documentation, 75(5), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2018-0209

170 Ryan, C. D., Schaul, A. J., Butner, R., & Swarthout, J. T. (2020). Monetizing disinformation in the attention economy: The case of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). European Management Journal, 38(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.11.002

171 Salminen, J., Sengün, S., Corporan, J., Jung, S-g., Jansen, B. J. (2020). Topic-driven toxicity: Exploring the relationship between online toxicity and news topics. PLoS ONE 15(2). e0228723. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228723

172 Savelli, M. R. (2016). The virtual marketplace of misinformation. Journal of Technologies in Knowledge Sharing, 12(3/4), 20–27.

173 Schaeffer, K. (2020, April). Nearly three-in-ten Americans believe COVID-19 was made in a lab. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/08/nearly-three-in-ten-americans-believe-covid-19-was-made-in-a-lab

174 Schefulele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019). Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(16), 7662–7669. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805871115

175 Sell, T. K., Hosangadi, D., & Trotochaud, M. (2020). Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: Analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3

176 Seymour, B., Getman, R., Saraf, A., Zhang, L. H., & Kalenderian, E. (2015). When advocacy obscures accuracy online: Digital pandemics of public health misinformation through an antifluoride case study. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302437

177 Shaffer, V. A., Focella, E. S., Hathaway, A., Scherer, L. D., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2018). On the usefulness of narratives: An interdisciplinary review and theoretical model. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52(5), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax008

178 Shaffer, V. A., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2013). All stories are not alike: A purpose-, content-, and valence-based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision aids. Medical Decision Making, 33(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X12463266

179 Shahsavari, S., Holur, P., Tangherlini, T. R., & Roychowdhury, V. (2020). Conspiracy in the time of Corona: Automatic detection of COVID-19 conspiracy theories in the media and the news. arXiv:2004.13783v1 [cs.CL] 28 Apr 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13783.pdf

180 Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Yang, K.-C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications, 9(1), 4787. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7

181 Sharma, K., Qian, F., Jiang, H., Ruchansky, N., Zhang, M., & Liu, Y. (2019). Combating fake news: A survey on identification and mitigation techniques. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems & Technology, 10(3), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3305260

182 Sheares, G., Miklencicova, R., & Grupac, M. (2020). The viral power of fake news: Subjective social insecurity, COVID-19 damaging misinformation, and baseless conspiracy theories. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 19, 12–127. https://doi.org/10.22381/LPI1920209

183 Shepherd, D. A., & Suddaby, R. (2017). Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316647102

184 Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2018, June). The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.008

185 Simon, H. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communications, and the public interest (pp. 37–72). Johns Hopkins Press.

186 Sommariva, S., Vamos, C., Mantzarlis, A., Uyên-Loan Đào, L., & Tyson, D. M. (2018). Spreading the (fake) news: Exploring health messages on social media and the implications for health professionals using a case study. American Journal of Health Education, 49(4), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2018.1473178

187 Southwell, B. G., Niederdeppe, J., Cappella, J. N., Gaysynsky, A., Kelley, D. E., Oh, A., Peterson, E. B., & Chou, W.-Y. S. (2019). Misinformation as a misunderstood challenge to public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(2), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.009

188 Spitzberg, B. H. (2001). The status of attribution theory qua theory in personal relationships. In V. Manusov, & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Attribution, communication behavior, and close relationships (pp. 353–371). Cambridge University Press.

189 Spitzberg, B. H. (2014). Toward a model of meme diffusion (M3D). Communication Theory, 24(3), 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12042

190 Spitzberg, B. H. (2019). Traces of pace, place and space in personal relationships: The chronogeometrics of studying relationships at scale. Personal Relationships, 26(2), 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12280

191 Spitzberg, B. H. (in press). Theorizing big social media data: A multilevel model of meme diffusion 2.0 (M3D2.0). In M.-H. Tsou & A. Nara (Eds.), Empowering human dynamics research with social media and geospatial data analytics. Springer.

192 Stano, S. (2020). The internet and the spread of conspiracy content. In M. Butter & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 483–496). Routledge.

193 Stone, M., Aravopoulou, E., Evans, G., Aldhaen, E., & Parnell, B. D. (2019). From information mismanagement to misinformation—The dark side of information management. Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 32(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-09-2018-0043

194 Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x

195 Swami, V., Barron, D., Weis, L., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., & Furnham, A. (2017). An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers. PLoS ONE, 12(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172617

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x