Joseph McElroy - Women and Men

Elsewhere in a broad-based effort to recycle, they’ve started without us, and we need to get over there, as if not there already bringing our prestressed flange units in postponement of perhaps pain, whatever news pain is. What, though, have they started? A woman looks forward and backward to have a baby naturally with her husband; elsewhere, another does the same if she only knew it, and meanwhile lies incarnate in a motel bed near Cape Kennedy hearing from her new lover, who does not dream, dream-like memories murmured till she can’t stay awake no more no more; elsewhere, a man tries to hear what his new lover instructs him to hear, like a third party between them — news to him. Oh, these people, many more, are sharply felt yet minimally known, of an articulate community that is our representative blood but, like inmost organs and habits, unknown to us or word we bring sealed by the sender, whose parting words were that there is no neutral messenger.

For in this brief-turned age or interlocking place we were thrust back to the drawing board. To find that our understanding could prove to be just plain light — for there’s no reason to think angels can’t learn too — while light in our case had recently proved sometimes sound. And, given off from us, this sound had more to it or less depending on the viewer’s place — that is, how much you were, and where you were coming from, and how. What mattered, though, was that among all points of view the more Much averaged a shade greater than the less. So we had not just differences in point of view: we had a net more Much given off, and this might mean so much in the long run that the shade greater More felt downright massive. And so we chose for Much the new term Mass.

Yet how came this net More? From the sound at source in us. Even us in the sound. Trying to know when our tenant angels spoke in us.

But given a net More given off, the source must suffer net loss. Net loss of mass material which could be weighed. Which meant (we had to think) that sound had weight. So weight in some state might have sound. Yet if our light was only sound, sound could well be light. If so, light too had weight (which became it never so much as in the losing of it).

This was hard. But actually not on us. Beset by abstraction we many of us thought to hang in a little longer. If light had weight to its mass and on good days proved relatively endless, must not we its sometime source be endless, too?

Whether or not we needed it in this seeming endless supply, it seemed to need us less. We hated to lose light like that. Yet coming to us, leaving us constantly, it seemed still to know its place. Which we kept it in. That is, its place of use to us. For reading. For gardening at sunset. For cave weekends. For open-ended incandescence. For seasonal definition, if at times light’s swift generalizing power transcended such particulars as that Chile was not South America, New York not the Capital, the Statue of Liberty not art. Lately, we used light for Obstacle Manipulation, where Eye-light means Contact, and we had learned by chance that at a distance and without touching we might move a plum away from a lemon if not toward ripeness; move a person — say, one half turn; or move a mountain with its half-known contents, yet do so only so long as we saw the movable thing as in a beautiful relation to us (thus Optical Kinaesthesia). And first and last, we used light for interrogation and inquiry.

Inquiry was not new to us. We had long since isolated through shifting densities light’s lightning turns, refractory quirks, and strangely confident bends impromptu and for all the world like thought — light’s fantasies or dreams no less! These we had plans to guide through staggered densities prism’d to sooner or later get back to us so that refract might come round to mean reflect. Until one day, angling and bending in hope of mastery, we grandly thought light’s refracting mediums no other than ourselves. Yet now the sound of voicing such insight shed light in us. Right down inside us. So light, losing mass to us inward, must find itself as if anew. Thus received in us, it must be in us conserved.

"Kept in its place," did we already remember saying? Its speed stayed constant even now, and if we now first surmised that, like its speed constant to all passing points of view, we could have our light and be it too, we still could not for sure maintain in bulk the illumination now shedding itself inwardly. We looked out on others of us and at our stars and at light’s bent through our waters and slow motions, and entertaining the possibility that we might through adaptation experience the first angelic senility. We looked inward and felt curious. We thought not just that if light never slows nor speeds up how can it be us? but since its sacred speed seems an unalterable inertia, why not an inertia of no motion? For we already remembered we had been told that we might make it stop.

Stop? But be itself. Let light, say, stop with us and be a pause.

And we half-listen, breathing, and with half ourselves wonder if it is by some awful standard exactly half. We can go in the front or back, the top, the bottom, one curve or another, or segment or seam or width of century, city, apartment house, gossip network, weather-station system doubling as arms-control monitoring grid, newly designed head, articulate structure that can accommodate a multiplicity of small-scale units, one gets the idea — though what about the long hills of soil turned over by hands? now this is small-scale agricultural homework inefficient and wasteful to one vision, body and soul by another, these hills are ours too and content to be not a model of the whole but a piece of Earth that’s one of many places we might be reflected, while some of us may be found elsewhere trouble-shooting to see where sunspots cross depression, high belts of auras fuel deep quests for the power source we were always meant to have, the gods told us through holes quietly drilled in our heads, if we could only look at it and see it, that power source which may be mere talent for prophecy. We’ve got a multiple child that’s equal to anything, exploring it, researching it, playing around with it — the harvest cycle, and Maunder Minimum rotation, deep steam from Earth’s magnetic engine, pure clean power from nuclear (say after us) Fusion, the race to find the tack to harness the void, for that’s where the power is.

Which Jim Mayn in later life listens to. At least there’s the machine and there he is, the tape recorder on the table and he’s sitting by it, used to being two or so places at once, staring along the desk at a picture of a global weather network.

Why has this life happened to him? Questions threaten to be unearned questions. He’s a guy — oh that explains everything! — a little more independent, more up on things by virtue of his work which he works hard at but at a leisurely slope. But why has what happened?

Nothing much. But a turn that your head takes and you aren’t all there for a while. I mean you can work out, go to a movie, have dinner with a lady, take your plane, or like now hear the flown-in tape, make a note or two, stare at the sphereful of weather stations doubling as other centers: But he’s looking down at it, the globe with little towers like a satellite’s antennae, a Christmas orange that grandma’s just getting started sticking with twig-hard little cloves the ends blunt so she has to bear down against her own flesh; but wait: that pomander’s a secretly familiar obstacle to this uncanny other.

He wouldn’t speak of it, this turn his head takes, they could lock him up for what he might know, but here it is, O.K.? he’s listening to the dusty correspondent-lady twang — no, simply say — her Buddhist quotes against the paper-thin crackle of fire she’s also reporting, within the larger, quiet, flesh-smooth breathing of the flames subsisting on an imperial gallon of non-renewable fossil fuel, fed too, in Mayn’s head, among all our multiplied voices, by an official back in Washington who got round the obstacle of dire new taxes if not death by beaming right through his compartmented economic advisers who said you can have these but not this, these but not this, substitute tat for tit but not both, Mr. President, through this and these the aforementioned official — future inflation be damned — beamed a budgetary implication that the war in question would cost ten billion tops and be all over by fiscal year-end — until Mayn is back where he’s been before quite really, yes quite really, and where, double-bodied, he is mile-years (scale-wise) above this weather-sphere.