Joseph McElroy - Ancient History - A Paraphrase

1. At the center of Henry James’ writings, forming a sort of hinge in James’ shelf, perhaps, stand a handful of tales in which someone contemplates and abides with the mysterious and supervalent absence of a dead or dying writer: “The Lesson of the Master,” “The Figure In The Carpet,” “The Aspern Papers,” “The Middle Years.” Joseph McElroy’s shelf is double-hinged (at least), with two narratives that resonate with this archetypal plot, in The Letter Left To Me and Ancient History: A Paraphase . In Letter , as in the examples from James, the narrator/ protagonist is a vulnerable recipient, a would-be interpreter or medium, left to contend with an opaque address from the dark side. Ancient History reverses these charges. It takes the form of an eloquent, garrulous, obsessionally digressive, tender and yet rebuking address to a dead genius.

2. I’ve just heaved out my effort at categorical description—“a reverse-engineered Jamesian address to the dead”—at great cost. For, like most — all? — of McElroy’s fiction, Ancient History stymies the categorical impulse to an extreme degree. McElroy’s prose, coming on less like a street-gang than like a storm-cloud of evocations, intimations, and signifiers, robs the reader of his guidebook and compass. McElroy doesn’t shirk clarity, or particularity; he’s a great bestower of intensely clear descriptive and conceptual moments. His writing consists of almost nothing else. But there are few writers less interested in standing to one side, in the role of ringmaster or stage manager, to interject with comparisons, framing remarks, or encompassing descriptions. For a reader hungry for announcements as to what he or she is experiencing, before, during or after the experience of it (and we are all this reader, sometimes, most especially at the fraught start of a new relationship to what fiction can do, the kind a first encounter with a master necessarily entails), a plunge into McElroy can be vertiginous.

3. It is worth it.

4. Another Advertisement for McElroy, while I’m risking those: like most writers who throw up such explosive challenges to ordinary narrative “sense,” McElroy’s at heart an adamant realist. A realist, that is, in the sense that his discontinuities generate, it seems to me, from a single pure impulse: to sort out what consciousness — our interval as minds trapped inside bodies on planet earth — really feels like, when pushed through the strange machine of language. Like this, damn it, not like you’ve been told before! It is with such self-appointments, rather than any desire to innovate in narrative or language per se , that a writer like McElroy sets out on a life’s work. And that, in turn, is what makes it (see #3, above) worth it: McElroy is demanding that his machine of language think , with each sentence it sets down, about what life on earth really consists of ( hint : it can be vertiginous).

5. Anyone seeking further such general encouragement ought to consult, as I have, Garth Risk Halberg’s eloquent “The Lost Postmodernist” (on Women And Men ), and the invaluable McElroy festschrifts in both Electronic Literature and Golden Handcuffs Review — perhaps most especially Mike Heppner’s defiant envoi “The Courage of Joseph McElroy”, which itself gives a reader courage, too.

6. Ancient History consists of an address, then — to whom? The famous dead writer, a suicide, bears a striking resemblance to Norman Mailer (in as much as he gives speeches in put-on accents, runs for office, writes about outer space, divorces spectacularly, punches and bleeds in public, etc.). The narrator, Cy, lives in the same New York apartment building as the Great Dead Man; he’s snuck into the famous writer’s rooms during the police investigation, there to deliver the text as a monologue both written and spoken, with a brief interruption during which he hides, like Hamlet, behind a curtain. Monologue consisting of what? Of centrifugal meditations on Cy’s coming of age in the company of two friends, one — like the narrator — a native of Brooklyn Heights, a city boy. The other, a friend from summers spent fleeing the city, a country boy. The two friends have never met, but may be on the verge of doing so; this possibility is for the narrator strangely destabilizing, and supercharged. So: two sets of men in erratic conjunction. Around them: women, children, careers, fame, public events, the world, outer space. McElroy is a specialist in matters of spatial relation: neighbors upstairs and down, passersby on the street, the eerie distances contained inside nuclear families — generally, he makes a subject of the power of adjacency and proximity in our intimate lives. Yet why should the Mailer-like writer be made to listen — if the dead can listen — to Cy’s stories of his two friends? The answer is that for all the intellectual and political force of the addressee’s public career — and these forces are respected by Cy as considerable in themselves — this monologuist may be seen to believe that the addressee has missed something. Missed something of life as it is actually lived, missed a thing as elusive as it is essential. It might even be supposed that it is this absence, this oversight, which has driven the addressee to his suicide. “You thought only the thirsty media cared for you, Dom — to drink you down and piss you out: the meteoric you at San Gennaro taking a flap in the face from one of those flag-exposing twin guinea hens who run Empire Hardware while yours truly watched through the fence with Joseph and Mary and their boy behind me; or you not quite upstaging sweet Seeger on the Hudson babbling huskily over your bourbon to a black news-chick while the skipper and his banjo sang us down the stinking tide; you bleeding right onto a hand-mike a raincollared TV reporter darted to you like an electric prod, against a field of dark Barrio stone the edge of live gunshots one summer night when you were supposed to be not in Spanish Harlem but giving a big birthday party for Dot in Edinburgh; you getting mugged all alone on Brooklyn Bridge a month ago by three kids who it turned out didn’t know who you were then or even by name later in some station house; you vomiting on a TV talk show, pointing at the eggy pool and calling it “Magma,” and after mopping your mouth and tongue-tip, answering the host’s original question straight and mild…. And those excuses posted in the kitchen for any and all callers? And what about “EARTH = SPACECRAFT”? That addendum hardly seems an excuse for anything. Would you use it to put off a media representative? Or is it a hot-line excuse for the President of the United States to whom if he phone you to congratulate you on being you you could say, “Sorry, can’t talk now: the earth is a spacecraft.” I’m losing you, Dom…”

7. So, maybe Ancient History is a kind of secretly-not-too-late intervention: Mailer was, after all, still alive. McElroy’s argument with his titanic soulmate (for I believe McElroy may have felt Mailer to be his rare equal in curiosity about the existential implications of the new technology and media that had altered the scope of our planetary understanding, and, assuming I’m right, I believe he would have right to feel this). One Brooklyn boy calling to another to reconsider his “Manichean” (the word is McElroy’s) exaggerations in favor of a view more grounded in awarenesses of bodies in time, bodies in their places, in rooms and in streets and in nature, and most of all as bodies in relation to others rather than existing in solipsistic outer-space vacuums of ego: “As on the educational channel last week my small Emma was watching the thin man Mr.