Carol A. Chapelle - The Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics

recognizing students as a valued data source in making classroom decisions,

fostering a shared set of expectations between teachers and students,

helping students set realistic language and learning goals,

promoting students to set realistic goals based on their accomplishments

prompting students to analyze the quality of their work. (Gottlieb, 2016)

Assessment as learning, viewed from an assets‐based perspective, is personalized for each student's individual strengths. Students can use self and peer assessment to gather and reflect on information about specific language performances as well as to generate a picture of their language development over time. Assessment as learning can also guide students in cultivating metacognitive, metalinguistic, and metacultural awareness of their language development that helps facilitate the crafting of individual learning goals. Additionally, multilingual learners can analyze how they choose to use their languages, the connections between their languages, the purposes for communicating, the embedded cultural nuances, and the audiences involved. Ultimately, learners can become instructional resources for one another and can be activated to be owners of their own learning (Wiliam & Leahy, 2015).

Since 1989, educational programs in the USA have witnessed the emergence and implementation of standards‐based education initiatives that identify the content for instruction, target learning outcomes, and specify expected learner achievement in terms of standards‐related criteria as part of system‐wide efforts. This phenomenon has made an impact on language classrooms worldwide (Stoynoff & Chapelle, 2005) through major initiatives including the Common European Framework of Reference (Council of Europe, 2001) and the continuing expansion of English Language Standards such as those in Australia, the USA, and, most recently, China. In addition, in the USA, there are specific English as a New Language Standards for elementary and secondary teachers who seek certification in that area (National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, 2010).

Despite the challenges, student standards provide the anchor and coherence across levels of implementation in educational assessment systems and have become integrated into every aspect of educational life. As Shephard, Penuel, and Davidson (2017) suggest, large‐scale accountability tests should not be the primary driver of educational reform; rather, change should begin with local decisions about curriculum and instructional practices, informed by classroom‐centered assessment that is grounded in a model of learning that is consistent with evidence from research about language learning and development, motivation, identity formation, and equity‐focused instruction.

Two critical stakeholder groups, students and teachers, are playing crucial roles in translating new ideas for assessment into effective classroom practices. With students at the forefront, it is not surprising that teachers struggle with the competing demands of being responsible for incorporating classroom assessment into instruction while also preparing students for external high‐stakes tests required for accountability. Teachers are expected to adapt emerging theories and techniques in assessment to their classrooms and to scaffold learning opportunities according to their multilingual learners' language development. Although teachers are essential to this process of adapting assessment approaches to local instructional contexts, teachers do not necessarily have the assessment literacy to take on this role.

Students are being asked to take on more responsibility for their own learning through self and peer assessment and are increasingly contributing to classroom decision making. While classroom assessment offers the promise of enhanced learning opportunities, additional research is needed to describe these classroom practices and the changing student–teacher relationships. These concerns notwithstanding, emerging perspectives on the dynamic interplay between teaching and learning that is mediated through assessment recognize the inherent value in classroom assessment and the information it yields. Through a participatory and interactive assessment process, teachers and students can both become empowered in promoting meaningful assessment practices as part of language development within content learning in the classroom.

SEE ALSO:Assessment of Integrated Skills; Task‐Based Language Assessment; Uses of Language Assessments

1 Andrade, H., Huff, K., & Brooke, G. (2012). Assessing learning. Students at the Center Series. Retrieved March 28, 2019 from https://www.nmefoundation.org/getmedia/dc8d7c02-8bb8-494f-8bee-d766bd55834a/Assessing-Learning-Students-at-the-Center?ext=.pdf

2 Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: Ten principles. Retrieved March 28, 2019 from http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/SBA/HKDSE/Eng_DVD/doc/Afl_principles.pdf

3 Bachman, L., & Damböck, B. (2017). Language assessment for classroom teachers. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

4 Berkowitz, M. W., Bier, M. C., & McCauley, B. (2016, July). Effective features and practices that support character development. Paper presented at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Workshop on Defining and Measuring Character and Character Education, Washington, DC.

5 Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–68.

6 Carless, D. (2015). Exploring learning‐oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69(6), 963–76.

7 Colby‐Kelly, C., & Turner, C. E. (2007). AFL research in the L2 classroom and evidence of usefulness: Taking formative assessment to the next level. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 9–38.

8 Coombe, C., Folse, K., & Hubley, N. (2007). A practical guide to assessing English language learners. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

9 Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

10 Cumming, A. (2009). What needs to be developed to facilitate classroom‐based assessment? TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 515–19.

11 Davison, C., & Leung, C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher‐based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 393–415.

12 Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

13 Gottlieb, M. (2016). Assessing English language learners: Bridges to equity (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

14 Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

15 Jones, N., & Saville, N. (2016). Learner oriented assessment: A systemic approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

16 McMillan, J. H. (2011). Classroom assessment: Principles and practices for effective standards‐based instruction. New York, NY: Pearson.

17 Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2009). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

18 Moss, P. (2008). Sociocultural implications for assessment I: Classroom assessment. In P. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 222–58). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

19 National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2010). English as a New Language Standards. (2nd ed.). Retrieved March 28, 2019 from https://www.nbpts.org/wp-content/uploads/ECYA-ENL.pdf