The Element Encyclopedia of Witchcraft
Judika Illes
the complete a–z for the entire magical world
For Clara Fisher and Irma Illes, with love
In memory of Zsuzsanna and Margit Grosz
Cover Page
Title Page The Element Encyclopedia of Witchcraft Judika Illes the complete a–z for the entire magical world
Dedication For Clara Fisher and Irma Illes, with love In memory of Zsuzsanna and Margit Grosz
Introduction
Elements of Witchcraft
Animals
Books of Magic and Witchcraft
Botanicals
Calendar of Revelry and Sacred Days
Creative Arts
Dictionary of Witchcraft: A Magical Vocabulary
The Divine Witch: Goddesses and Gods
Ergot, The Corn Mother, and The Rye Wolf
Fairies
Fairy-Tale Witches and Mother Goose
Food and Drink
The Hag
The Horned One and The Devil
Magical Arts
Magical Professions
Places: A witch’s Travel Guide
Tools of Witchcraft
Witchcraft Hall of Fame
Witchcraze! Persecution of Witches
Women’s Mysteries
Wormwood and Garlic: Dangers and Protection
Bibliography
Acknowledgments
Other Book By
Copyright
About the Publisher
Most of my clothes are black. I have a black cat. My favorite holiday is Halloween. I have perpetually unruly hair. Given the right company, I will happily chatter on about astrology, magic, herbs, and divination. I write books of magic spells. So perhaps it’s not surprising that periodically I’m asked whether I’m a witch.
Invariably, my response is to say that my answer depends upon the inquirer’s definition of witchcraft. Inevitably this leads to frustration (and often to anger) on the part of the inquirer: they think they’ve asked a very simple, straightforward question because, of course, every child, any idiot so to speak, knows the definition of “ witch .” Their perception is that I’m being snippy and evasive (stereotypical witch behavior, incidentally) when in fact I’m just wary. I’ve already experienced too many unpleasant encounters with those whose definitions of witchcraft did not correspond with my own—or with each other’s for that matter. I’ve learned that, just like beauty, what constitutes witchcraft is dependent upon the eye of its beholder.
Don’t believe me? Let’s look in the dictionary.
The following definition is from Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary :
WITCH(n ME wicche fr. OE wicca, masc. wizard and wicce fem. witch; akin to MHG wicken to bewitch, OE wigle divination, OHG wih holy—more at victim)
1a. Wizard, Sorcerer
1b. a woman practicing the black arts: SORCERESS
1c. one supposed to possess supernatural powers esp. by compact with devil or familiar
1d. or Witcher : Dowser
2. an ugly old woman: HAG
3. a charming or alluring woman
Oh boy, we’ve got some contradictions right there. Which witch does my inquirer suppose me to be? Should I take the question as a compliment or as an insult? It’s probably safe to presume that most women wouldn’t strongly object to the insinuation that they’re charming or alluring but what if the witch this particular questioner has in mind is actually that ugly old hag or Satan’s minion?
Hags, wizards, compacts with the devil: these definitions, or at least the words used to express them, demonstrate an archaic tone. In all fairness, I grabbed the first dictionary at hand. The definition quoted above comes from a well-worn 1965 edition, not that long ago considering the entire scope of time, but still, perhaps a newer edition might offer a more modern definition. With the wonders of modern technology and automatic updates, Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary is about as up-to-date as dictionaries get, yet its definition of the word witch is similar to the one from 1965 with but one significant addition:
WITCH
1: one that is credited with usually malignant supernatural powers; especially: a woman practicing usually black witchcraft often with the aid of a devil or familiar:
SORCERESS—compare WARLOCK
2: an ugly old woman: HAG
3: a charming or alluring girl or woman
4: a practitioner of Wicca
Now in addition to “ practicing usually black witchcraft ” the witch may also be “ a practitioner of Wicca ” although whether Wicca and black witchcraft are different or synonymous is not addressed.
Both dictionary definitions link witches with women; at least that much seems clear. Or is it? The further one searches for a definitive definition of the witch the more elusive and labyrinthine the subject becomes.
Other references suggest a narrower definition of witchcraft, albeit with greater flexibility regarding gender. According to Dr Margaret Alice Murray, the controversial scholar who wrote a long-standing definition of witchcraft for the Encyclopedia Britannica , the word “ witch ” has been used since the fifteenth century almost exclusively to describe persons, either male or female, who worked magic.
Funk and Wagnalls Standard Dictionary of Folklore, Mythology and Legend further clarifies this issue of gender. That book defines a witch as
a person who practices sorcery; a sorcerer or sorceress; one having supernatural powers in the natural world, especially to work evil and usually by association with evil spirits or the Devil: formerly applied to both men and women but now generally restricted to women. Belief in witches exists in all lands, from earliest times to the present day.
Although Margaret Murray’s definition is neutral in tone, the others possess, to varying degrees, an air of malevolency. So perhaps I should be insulted at the suggestion that I’m “ witchy .”
You want a really virulent definition of “witch”? Try this one:
“Witches are the devil’s whores who steal milk, raise storms, ride on goats or broomsticks, lame or maim people, torture babies in their cradles, change things into different shapes so that a human being seems to be a cow or an ox and force people into love and immorality.”
Martin Luther, 1522
Perhaps not. Maybe I should be flattered. Author Raymond Buckland, a pivotal figure in the evolution of modern Wicca and an authority on magic, divination, and witchcraft, acknowledges the very same etymology quoted in the dictionaries yet proposes a positive understanding of the word “ witch ”:
The actual meaning of the word Witch is linked to “wisdom” and is the same root as “to have wit” and “to know.” It comes from the Anglo-Saxon wicce (f) or wicca (m) meaning “wise one,” witches being both female and male.
On the other hand, many would advise me to absolutely not engage in discussion with anyone who wishes to know whether I’m a witch, not because of any potential insult but because the whole notion of witches and witchcraft is absurd. Their definition of “ witch ” doesn’t extend to living, breathing human beings. I can’t possibly be a witch; it’s not even worth discussing, because witches are made up, fictional: they don’t exist outside fairy tales, stories, and legends. Obviously anyone asking me this question is simple-minded, delusional, mentally ill or just teasing. Those adhering to this definition may in fact love witchcraft very much—in its place, which is fiction. Their witches exist in realms inhabited by trolls, ogres, fire-breathing dragons, and handsome princes who miraculously arrive on white horses at the very last second. They are integral to fairy and folk tales but are not perceived as belonging to “real life” except as a story-teller’s device.
Читать дальше