Communicating Science in Times of Crisis

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis» — ознакомительный отрывок электронной книги совершенно бесплатно, а после прочтения отрывка купить полную версию. В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Жанр: unrecognised, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Communicating Science in Times of Crisis: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

Learn more about how people communicate during crises with this insightful collection of resources  In 
, distinguished academics and editors H. Dan O’Hair and Mary John O’Hair have delivered an insightful collection of resources designed to shed light on the implications of attempting to communicate science to the public in times of crisis. Using the recent and ongoing coronavirus outbreak as a case study, the authors explain how to balance scientific findings with social and cultural issues, the ability of media to facilitate science and mitigate the impact of adverse events, and the ethical repercussions of communication during unpredictable, ongoing events. 
The first volume in a set of two, 
 isolates a particular issue or concern in each chapter and exposes the difficult choices and processes facing communicators in times of crisis or upheaval. The book connects scientific issues with public policy and creates a coherent fabric across several communication studies and disciplines. The subjects addressed include: 
A detailed background discussion of historical medical crises and how they were handled by the scientific and political communities of the time Cognitive and emotional responses to communications during a crisis Social media communication during a crisis, and the use of social media by authority figures during crises Communications about health care-related subjects Data strategies undertaken by people in authority during the coronavirus crisis Perfect for communication scholars and researchers who focus on media and communication, 
 also has a place on the bookshelves of those who specialize in particular aspects of the contexts raised in each of the chapters: social media communication, public policy, and health care.

Communicating Science in Times of Crisis — читать онлайн ознакомительный отрывок

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

20 Bondielli, A., & Marcelloni, F. (2019). A survey on fake news and rumour detection techniques. Information Sciences, 497, 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.035

21 Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2018). The global organization of social media disinformation campaigns. Journal of International Affairs, 71(1.5), 23–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26508115

22 Bradshaw, S., Howard, P. N., Kollanyi, B., & Neudert, L.-M. (2020). Sourcing and automation of political news and information over social media in the United States, 2016–2018. Political Communication, 37(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1663322

23 Brennen, J. S., Simon, F. M., Howard, P. N., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020, April). Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation

24 Britton, T., Ball, F., & Trapman, P. (2020). A mathematical model reveals the influence of population heterogeneity on herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Science, 369(6505), 846–849. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc6810@

25 Brody, D. C., & Meier, D. M. (2018). How to model fake news. arXiv:1809.00964v2

26 Brotherton, R. (2013, September). Towards a definition of ‘conspiracy theory’. PSYPAG Quarterly, 88, 9–14. http://www.psypag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Issue-88.pdf

27 Brotherton, R., & French, C. C. (2014). Belief in conspiracy theories and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2995

28 Brotherton, R., & French, C. C. (2015). Intention seekers: Conspiracist ideation and biased attributions of intentionality. PloS One, 10(5), e0124125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124125

29 Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013, May). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279

30 Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013, December). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225

31 Bryant, E. (2008). Real lies, white lies and gray lies: Towards a typology of deception. Kaleidoscope, 7, 23–48. https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/hct_faculty/6

32 Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6(3), 203–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x

33 Burgess, A. W., & Hartman, C. R. (2018). On the origin of grooming. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517742048

34 Butter, M., & Knight, P. (2016). Bridging the great divide: Conspiracy theory research for the 21st century. Diogenes, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192116669289

35 Caballero, E. G. (2020). Social network analysis, social big data and conspiracy theories. In M. Butter & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 135–147). Routledge.

36 Calisher, C., Carroll, D., Colwell, R., Corley, R. B., Daszak, P., Drosten, C., Enjuanes, L., Farrar, J., Field, H., Golding, J., Gorbalenya, A., Haagmans, B., Hughes, J. M., Karesh, W. B., Keusch, G. T., Lam, S. K., Lubroth, J., Mackenzie, J. S., Madoff, L., & Turner, M. (2020). Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19. Lancet, 395(10226), e42–e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9

37 Cantarero, K., Van Tilburg, W. A. P., & Szarota, P. (2018, November). Differentiating everyday lies: A typology of lies based on beneficiary and motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.013

38 Carlson, M. (2020). Fake news as an informational moral panic: The symbolic deviancy of social media during the 2016 US presidential election. Information, Communication & Society, 23(3), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1505934

39 Carmichael, A. G. (1998). The last past plague: The uses of memory in Renaissance epidemics. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 53(2), 132–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/53.2.132

40 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Prioritizing zoonotic diseases for multisectoral, one health collaboration in the United States (Workshop summary). https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/what-we-do/zoonotic-disease-prioritization/us-workshops.html

41 Chou, W.-Y. S., Oh, A., & Klein, W. M. P. (2018). Addressing health-related misinformation on social media. JAMA, 320(23), 2417–2418. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.16865

42 Clarke, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.1177/004931032002001

43 Clementson, D. E. (2017). Truth bias and partisan bias in political deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(4), 407–430. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X17744004

44 Cohn, S. K., Jr. (2007). The Black Death and the burning of Jews. Past & Present, 196(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtm005

45 Cohn, S. K. (2012). Pandemics: Waves of disease, waves of hate from the plague of Athens to A.I.D.S. Historical Research, 85(230), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2281.2012.00603.x

46 Connolly, J. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C. A., & West, J. P. (2019). Communicating to the public in the era of conspiracy theory. Public Integrity, 21(5), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2019.1603045

47 Corrigan, R., & Denton, P. (1996). Causal understanding as a developmental primitive. Developmental Review, 16(2), 162–202. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1996.0007

48 Curtis, D. A., & Hart, C. L. (2020). Deception in psychotherapy: Frequency, typology and relationship. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 20(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12263

49 Davis, M. (2019). Uncertainty and immunity in public communications on pandemics. In K. Bjørkdahl & B. Carlsen (Eds.), Pandemics, publics, and politics (pp. 29–42). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2802-2_3

50 Dawes, G. W. (2018). Identifying pseudoscience: A social process criterion. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 49(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-017-9388-6

51 de Regt, A., Montecchi, M., & Lord Ferguson, S. (2020). A false image of health: How fake news and pseudo-facts spread in the health and beauty industry. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2180

52 de Santisteban, P., del Hoyo, J., Alcázar-Córcoles, M. Á., & Gámez-Guadix, M. (2018). Progression, maintenance, and feedback of online child sexual grooming: A qualitative analysis of online predators. Child Abuse & Neglect, 80, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.026

53 Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(3), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113

54 Dietz, P. (2018). Grooming and seduction. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517742060

55 DiMaggio, P. J. (1995). Comments on ‘What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393790, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393790

56 Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Communicating Science in Times of Crisis» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x