To conclude the reflections, this chapter also invites us to explore the new forms of conviviality and eating together that are emerging. This is especially true since the recent lockdowns due to the Covid-19 pandemic have probably redefined some of the basics of household food consumption. Moreover, this unprecedented situation has prompted many consumers to practice cyber-eating together : having “Skype happy hours”, making “Zoom meals”, etc. The materiality, skills and meanings of eating together are probably redefined in these situations. Beyond the new conditions for implementing the practice, these developments may raise questions in terms of promoting eating together for nutritional reasons: do we retain the nutritional benefits of commensality when screens are invited to the table?
1.8. Appendix: Sample summary
Respondent’s code name |
Gender |
Structure of the home |
Age |
Marion |
F |
Lives with a partner |
33 |
Esther |
F |
Lives alone |
67 |
Paola |
F |
Lives with a partner |
29 |
Valérie |
F |
Lives with husband and two children |
48 |
Noémie |
F |
Mother |
26 |
Bérengère |
F |
Lives alone |
29 |
Arnold |
M |
Lives with wife and daughter |
46 |
Maurice |
M |
Lives alone |
69 |
Roxane |
F |
Lives with husband and son |
33 |
Camille |
F |
Shares with a friend |
21 |
Amélie |
F |
Shared custody of daughter |
42 |
Coline |
F |
Mother |
48 |
Myriam |
F |
Lives with husband and son |
42 |
Sylvie |
F |
Lives alone |
30 |
Justin |
M |
Shares with two friends |
24 |
Sabrina |
F |
Lives alone |
23 |
Vincent |
M |
Lives alone, although sometimes with his son |
52 |
Léa |
F |
Lives with husband and two daughters |
30 |
Thibaut |
M |
Lives with a partner |
32 |
Marie |
F |
Lives with husband and newborn |
32 |
Edouard |
M |
Lives with a partner |
29 |
Cédric |
M |
Lives with wife and two children |
37 |
Max |
M |
Lives with wife and two children |
40 |
Afssa (2009). Étude individuelle nationale des consommations alimentaires 2 (INCA 2) 2006–2007. Report, Afssa.
Anses (2017). Étude individuelle nationale des consommations alimentaires 3 (INCA 3). Report, Anses.
Castetbon, K., Lafay, L., Volatier, J-L., Escalon, H., Delamaire, C., Chauliac, M., Ledésart, B., Hercberg, S. (2011). Le Programme National Nutrition Santé (PNNS) : bilan des études et résultats observés. Cahiers de Nutrition et de Diététique, Programme National Nutrition Santé , 46(2, Supplement 1), S11–S25.
Chauliac, M. (2011). PNNS : 2001-2006-2010-2015 Stratégies et dynamiques [Online]. Available at: http://inpes.santepubliquefrance.fr/jp/cr/pdf/2011/session7/Presentation-Chauliac.pdf[Accessed 20 October 2017].
CREDOC (2017). Comportements et attitudes des consommateurs à l’égard du commerce alimentaire en 2017. Cahier de recherche , 336.
De Castro, J.M. (1994). Family and friends produce greater social facilitation of food intake than other companions. Physiology & Behavior , 56(3), 445–455.
Evans, D. (2011). Blaming the consumer – once again: The social and material contexts of everyday food waste practices in some English households. Critical Public Health , 21(4), 429–440.
Fischler, C. and Masson, E. (2008). Manger : français, européens et américains face à l’alimentation . Odile Jacob, Paris.
Fournier-Schill, M. (2014). Analyse d’une pratique sociale en construction : le cas du tri des déchets dans la famille. PhD Thesis, Lille School of Management Research Center, Lille.
Gram-Hanssen, K. (2010). Residential heat comfort practices: Understanding users. Building , Research & Information , 38(2), 175–186.
Hand, M., Shove, E., Southerton, D. (2005). Explaining showering: A discussion of the material, conventional, and temporal dimensions of practice. Sociological Research Online , 10(2), 101–113.
Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture , 11(1), 79–99.
HCSP (2010). Objectifs de santé publique. Évaluation des objectifs de la loi du 9 août 2004. Propositions, Haut Conseil de la santé publique, Paris.
Hercberg, S. (2006). Eléments de bilan du PNNS (2001–2005) et propositions de nouvelles stratégies pour le PNNS2 (2006–2008) : pour une grande mobilisation nationale de tous les acteurs pour la promotion de la nutrition en France. Report, Ministère de la Santé et des Solidarités, Paris.
IGAS (2010). Evaluation du programme national nutrition santé PNNS2 2006–2010. Report, IGAS RM2010-057P/CGAAER no. 2016.
Keller, M., Kiisel, M., Vihalemm, T. (2015). From Intervention to Social Change: A Guide to Reshaping Everyday Practices . Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, Farnham.
Mathe, T., Beldame, D., Hebel, P. (2014). Évolution des représentations sociales du bien manger. Cahiers de recherche de Crédoc , C316
Menninger, D.J., Lecoq, G., Guedj, J., Boutet, P., Banel, J.-B. (2010). Evaluation du programme national nutrition santé PNNS2 2006–2010. Report, Inspection générale des Affaires Sociales, Paris.
Ministère du travail, de l’emploi et de la santé (2010). Programme national nutrition santé 2011–2015. Report, Ministère du travail, de l’emploi et de la santé, Paris.
Mugel, O., Gurviez, P., Decrop, A. (2019). Eudaimonia around the kitchen: A hermeneutic approach to understanding food well-being in consumers’ lived experiences. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing , 38(2), 280–295.
Plessz, M. and Gojard, S. (2014). Fresh is best? Social position, cooking, and vegetable consumption in France. Sociology , 49(1), 172–190.
Poulain, J.-P. (2006). Combien de repas par jour ? Normes culturelles et normes médicales en Polynésie Française. Journal des anthropologues. Association française des anthropologues , 3–4(106–107), 245–268.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory , 5(2), 243–263.
Schatzki, T.R. (1997). Practices and actions: A Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens. Philosophy of the Social Sciences , 27(3), 283–308.
Schatzki, T.R. (2005). Practice mind-ed orders. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , Knorr, K.K., Schatzki, T.R., Von Savigny, E. (eds). Routledge, London.
Shove, E. and Pantzar, M. (2005). Consumers, producers and practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of Consumer Culture , 5(1), 43–64.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes . Sage Publications, London.
Spurling, N., McMeekin, A., Shove, E., Southerton, D., Welch, D. (2013). Interventions in practice: Re-framing policy approaches to consumer behaviour. Report. Sustainable practices research group, University of Manchester, Manchester.
Читать дальше