James A. Jahnke - Continuous Emission Monitoring

51 Sadegh, A. and Worek, W. (ed.) (2017). Mechanical Engineer's Handbook, 12ee. New York: McGraw‐Hill.

52 Sale, J.W. (2000a). Modified Dilution Extractive Probe Reduces NOx Measurement Bias Error. Lehigh Energy Update. February 2000, Vol. 18(1). https://www.lehigh.edu/energy/leu/leu_21.pdf

53 Sale, J.W. (2000b). Dilution Extractive Probe Improvements Now Available Commercially. Lehigh Energy Update. August 2000, Vol. 18(2). https://www.lehigh.edu/~inenr/leu/leu_24.pdf

54 Schakenbach, J. Fax, G., and Werner, A. (2002) Spin off of selected CEMS‐related QA activities selected CEMS‐related QA activities. Paper presented at the Air & Waste Management Association Meeting, Baltimore, paper 42583 (23–27 June 2002).

55 Shahin, B. (2016). Multipoint probes to mitigate stratification. Power Point Presentation. CEMTEK Users Meeting. 28 September 2016. Costa Mesa, CA. https://www.cemteks.com/2016‐seminar‐training.

56 Shapiro, A.H. (1953). The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow. New York: Ronald Press.

57 Sherman, R.E. (2005). Modular Sample Systems: Circor Tech Substrates & Industry‐wide Components. Center for Process Analytical Chemistry Spring 2005 NeSSI User Group Meeting. Seattle: University of Washington Center for Process Analytical Chemistry.

58 Silcotek. (2017). Silcotek 101. https://www.silcotek.com

59 Sneek, E. (1997). Optimization of continuous emission monitoring of NOx and SO2. In: Proceedings – International Workshop on Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM97), 87–99. London: IEA Coal Research.

60 Swaans, W., Barbers, R., Lenaers, G. et al. 2018. Richlijnen voor omgang met meetgaskoelers bij de meting van NO2 en SO2 in vochtig afgas. Department of Environment Study 2018/MRG/R/1483. Belgium.

61 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2012). EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards. EPA‐600/R‐12/531.

62 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2020a). Continuous emission monitoring. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 75. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.

63 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2020b). Reference method 19 – determination of sulfur dioxide removal efficiency and particulate matter, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emission rates. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 60 Appendix A. Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.

64 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2020c). Subpart BB – standards of performance for Kraft Pulp Mill. Appendix A. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR 60 Washington, DC: Office of the Federal Register.

65 Wawrowski, J.M. (2004). Modular Platform Components (MPC) Overview. NeSSI Workshop 6 May 2004. Seattle: University of Washington Center for Process Analysis and Control.

66 White, J.R. (1995). Problems and solutions for continuous emissions monitors while measuring SO2 down stream of NOx control. Paper presented at the Air & Waste Management Association Meeting, San Antonio, paper 95‐TA16B.03 (18–23 June 1995).

67 Williams, B. (1992). Environment Canada. Private communication.

1 Chapman, R.L. (1974). Continuous stack monitoring. Environmental Science & Technology 8 (6): 520525.

2 Dillehay, D. (1993). Direct extractive measurement of unconditioned wet flue stack gases. In: Proceedings – Continuous Emission Monitoring – A Technology for the 90s, 350–359. Pittsburgh: Air and Waste Management Association.

3 Electric Power Research Institute (1993). Continuous Emission Monitoring Guidelines: Update. EPRI TR‐102386‐V1. Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute.

4 Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (2008). Air Pollution Prevention Manual on Emission Monitoring. Research Report 360 16 004 UBA – FB 001090. DessauRosslau, Germany: Federal Environment Agency.

5 Frank, H. and Mullowney, R. (1990). Recycling ambient monitors as stack gas monitors at Dairyland power. In: Proceedings – Specialty Conference on: Continuous Emission Monitoring – Present and Future Applications, 390–392. Pittsburgh: Air and Waste Management Association.

6 Houser, E.A. (1977). Principles of Sampling Handling and Sampling System Design for Process Analysis. Pittsburgh: Instrument Society of America.

7 Jahnke, J.A. (1995). Eliminating bias in CEM systems. In: Proceedings – Acid Rain & Electric Utilities – Permits, Allowances, Monitoring, & Meteorology, 391–400. Pittsburgh: Air & Waste Management Association.

8 Jahnke, J.A. (1994). An Operator's Guide to Eliminating Bias in CEM Systems. EPA 430‐R‐94‐016. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.

9 Jahnke, J.A. and Johnson, W.E. (2003). Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) System Application and Maintenance Guide. Electric Power Research Institute Technical Report 1009057. Palo Alto, CA

10 Laird, J.C., Patton, J.C., Zolner, W.J., and Tomlin, R.L. (1978). Unique extractive stack sampling system for continuous emission monitoring. Paper presented at the Instrument Society of America Meeting, Houston, (22–25 May 1978).

11 Maurice, R.L., Robertson, J.A., and Howder, J.M. (1986). Design, specification, and installation of a replacement CEM at Apache Station. In: Transactions – Continuous Emission Monitoring – Advances and Issues, 44–51. Pittsburgh: Air Pollution Control Association.

12 Myers, R.L., Fredette, P., and Vojtko, D. (1995). New Vacuum Dilution sample transport system provides low maintenance CEMS front‐end with greatly enhanced flexibility. In: Proceedings – Acid Rain & Electric Utilities – Permits, Allowances, Monitoring, & Meteorology, 690–701. Pittsburgh: Air & Waste Management Association.

13 Navarre, A.J. and Ayer, C. (1978). Development of champion papers' stack gas sampling/calibration system using a calibration probe. Paper presented at Air Pollution Control Association Meeting, Houston, paper 78‐47.5 (25–30 June 1978).

14 Patton, J.C., Martin, G.W., Ross, J.A., and Spangler, W. (1979). A turn‐key extractive sampling system to continuously monitor gaseous emissions from fossil fuel fired boiler stacks. Paper presented at the Air Pollution Control Association Meeting, Cincinnati, paper 79‐35.1 (24–29 June 1979).

15 Peritsky, M.M., Wood, R.D., and Wendt, J.O.L. (1981). Extractive Flue‐gas Sampling Challenges Insitu Methods. Power (December).

16 Richards, J.A. (1984). Guidelines on Preferred Location and Design of Measurement Ports for Air Pollution Control Systems. EPA‐340/1‐84‐017.

17 Schakenbach, J. Fax, G., and Werner, A.. (2002) Spin off of selected CEMS‐related QA activities selected CEMS‐related QA activities. Paper presented at the Air & Waste Management Association Meeting, Baltimore, paper 42583 (23–27 June 2002).

18 Shapiro, A.H. (1953). The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow. New York: Ronald Press.

19 Sherman, R.E. (2002). Process Analyzer Sample‐Conditioning System Technology. New York: Wiley.

20 Sorrel, C.B. (1986). Critical orifice in gas sampling trains for volume and rate measurements. Paper presented at the Air Pollution Control Association Meeting, Minneapolis, paper 8671.1.

21 Tatera, J. (1993). A review and discussion of several design requirements that will impact CEM systems used in hazardous process plant environments. In: Proceedings – Continuous Emission Monitoring – A Technology for the 90s, 99–110. Pittsburgh: Air and Waste Management Association.

22 Turnbull, J. (1998). Sample handling and calibration. In: Proceedings – CEM 98 International Workshop on Continuous Emissions Monitoring, 184–192. London: IEA Coal Research.

23 Waters, T. (2013). Industrial Sampling Systems: Reliable Design & Maintenance for Process Analyzers. Swagelok Company.