Mary Roach - Grunt

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Mary Roach - Grunt» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Город: New York, Год выпуска: 2016, ISBN: 2016, Издательство: W. W. Norton, Жанр: nonf_military, sci_popular, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Grunt: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Grunt»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

Best-selling author Mary Roach explores the science of keeping human beings intact, awake, sane, uninfected, and uninfested in the bizarre and extreme circumstances of war.
Grunt
Tennessee
An Amazon Best Book of June 2016:
Amazon.com Review It takes a special kind of writer to make topics ranging from death to our gastrointestinal tract interesting (sometimes hilariously so), and pop science writer Mary Roach is always up to the task. In her latest book,
, she explores how our soldiers combat their non-gun-wielding opponents—panic, heat exhaustion, the runs, and more. It will give you a new appreciation not only for our men and women in uniform (and by the way, one of the innumerable things you’ll learn is how and why they choose the fabric for those uniforms), but for the unsung scientist-soldiers tasked with coming up with ways to keep the “grunts” alive and well. If you are at all familiar with Roach’s oeuvre, you know her enthusiasm for her subjects is palpable and infectious. This latest offering is no exception.
—Erin Kodicek,
“A mirthful, informative peek behind the curtain of military science.” (Washington Post)
“From the ever-illuminating author of
and
comes an examination of the science behind war. Even the tiniest minutiae count on the battlefield, and Roach leads us through her discoveries in her inimitable style.” (Elle)
“Mary Roach is one of the best in the business of science writing… She takes readers on a tour of the scientists who attempt to conquer the panic, exhaustion, heat, and noise that plague modern soldiers.” (Brooklyn Magazine)
“Extremely likable … and quick with a quip…. [Roach’s] skill is to draw out the good humor and honesty of both the subjects and practitioners of these white arts among the dark arts of war.” (San Francisco Chronicle)
“Nobody does weird science quite like [Roach], and this time, she takes on war. Though all her books look at the human body in extreme situations (sex! space! death!), this isn’t simply a blood-drenched affair. Instead, Roach looks at the unexpected things that take place behind the scenes.” (Wired)
“Brilliant.” (Science)
“Roach … applies her tenacious reporting and quirky point of view to efforts by scientists to conquer some of the soldier’s worst enemies.” (Seattle Times)
“Covering these topics and more, Roach has done a fascinating job of portraying unexpected, creative sides of military science.” (New York Post)
“Having investigated sex, death, and preparing for space travel,
best-selling Roach applies her thorough—and thoroughly entertaining—techniques to the sobering subject of keeping soldiers not just alive but alert and healthy of mind and body during warfare.” (Library Journal)
“A rare literary bird, a best selling science writer … Roach avidly and impishly infiltrates the world of military science…. Roach is exuberantly and imaginatively informative and irreverently funny, but she is also in awe of the accomplished and committed military people she meets.” (Booklist (starred review))

Grunt — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Grunt», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

There is quiet at the table. I’m thinking this story maybe isn’t hypothetical. I’m adjusting to the concept of a “casualty collection point,” to the horrible fact that there can be enough casualties for a “collection.”

“So,” Dianna says after a moment. “Back to heat.”

“I’m sorry.” Stab, stab, shovel, chew. “I have very little to say about heat. People used to ask me, ‘What it’s like in Iraq?’” A garbanzo bean dies on a tine. “Open your oven and crawl in.”

Dianna persists. “So Josh, I hear stories of guys superhydrating ahead of time so they don’t have to carry water. So they can carry extra ammo.”

Dr. Adolph looked into this. “By predrinking,” he wrote, “man converts his interior into an accessory storage tank. A man on foot can thus carry as much as a quart or more of additional water.” Adolph had a group of men fill their tanks by drinking two pints of water, and then sent them out into the heat on a “dehydration hike.” By checking the dilution of their urine, he was able to conclude that only 15 to 25 percent of the “predrunk” water had been peed out. The rest was available to become cooling sweat.

However, desert survival scenarios aside, the US Army does not advocate predrinking. Exerting oneself on a sloshing stomach is uncomfortable and compromises performance. And soldiers who get carried away in their effort to fill the “storage tank” risk water poisoning: overdiluting the body’s salt levels and throwing the system fatally out of whack.

Also, it may not be manly. “If you take extra ammo,” says Josh in response to his mother’s query, “you don’t take it at the expense of water. You just take it. You man up, and you take it.” Somewhere Josh found blueberries for his salad. He goes at them with brisk, well-centered stabs. He’s going to ace the Bayonet Assault Course.

Speaking of hot-weather military dilemmas: Let’s talk about body armor. The current ensemble weighs 33 pounds. You are weightlifting just going up a flight of stairs. Josh had a buddy who was killed on a rooftop without his body armor on. “His command was ridiculed for it. But in all reality, I wouldn’t have had my body armor on, either.”

“Do you take it off because it’s too hot?” I’m like a fly buzzing around his head. A little yapping dog at his ankles.

“I take it off because it makes sense.”

Dan steps in to lighten the tone. “Mary, we’re walking up and down mountains with a hundred pounds on our backs, fighting guys in sandals and man-dresses. The Army’s answer to a lot of things is to give you more equipment, more stuff, most of which takes batteries, and there’s only so much you can carry.”

The Army’s other answer, one they have flirted with for over a decade now, is a wearable hydraulic exoskeleton to help with heavy loads. Lockheed Martin posted a video of its entry, the HULC (Human Universal Load Carrier), on YouTube. Soldiers are shown bounding across gullies and taking cover behind boulders while wearing articulated metal braces on the outsides of their legs, as though the Army had taken to conscripting 1950s polio victims. The HULC was tested at Natick in 2010, on a “prolonged march” with an 87-pound load. One of the comments posted for the YouTube video comes from a participant in that test: “Everyone was pretty much done at forty-five minutes due to shin splints. ” Others questioned whether fighters could move quickly under fire or even pick themselves up if they fell. Patrick Tucker, the technology editor for the website Defense One, tripped over the battery life: five hours, provided you’re moving slowly (2.5 mph) and on level terrain. He doubted HULC’s usefulness in places without a steady power supply—“like, basically any place where soldiers might, you know, have to fight.”

“Do you want to know why my friend got killed?” says Josh. “Somebody probably heard him going into the building, because he couldn’t be quiet enough, because he’s carrying too much shit in the first place. There’s all kinds of restrictions that risk-averse people are making. They have good intentions but they have bad effects.”

Dianna points to my tape recorder. “You can probably turn that off.” Heat isn’t going to be a topic, just a mood.

DRIVING BACK from lunch, Josh and Dan sit in the back, planning their workout. I hear Dan say, “one hundred snatches,” which hits my ear like a Dr. Seuss title. Up in front, Dianna and I talk science. I tell her about my recent visit to Natick Labs. They have a manikin that sweats! And “water-needs prediction equations”! You plug in the weather report and the fighters’ loads and activity levels, and it tells you how much water you’re going to need to haul to the battlefield. How excellent is that, I want to say, but I know Josh is listening.

I understand his scorn. I understand there’s always a factor left out of the equation, something unknowable to someone who’s not out there, inside the madness. I know every mission has unique requirements and risks. I know why there are derogatory names for people who sit in air-conditioned offices making rules for people out humping artillery across an open courtyard at noon in Afghanistan. Though at the moment, I can’t remember what those names are.

“Chairborne Ranger?” offers Dan. “Pogue?”

Scientist ,” says Josh. Dianna taps the steering wheel with one thumb. She glances in the rearview mirror. “I love you, son.”

Josh stares out the window. “I love you too, Ma. No shame.”

A few words in defense of military scientists. I agree that squad leaders are in the best position to know what and how much their men and women need to bring on a given mission. But you want those squad leaders to be armed with knowledge, and not all knowledge comes from experience. Sometimes it comes from a pogue at USUHS who’s been investigating the specific and potentially deadly consequences of a bodybuilding supplement. Or an army physiologist who puts men adrift in life rafts off the dock at a Florida air base and discovers that wetting your uniform cools you enough to conserve 74 percent more of your body fluids per hour. Or the Navy researcher who comes up with a way to speed the recovery time from travelers’ diarrhea. These things matter when it’s 115 degrees and you’re trying to keep your troops from dehydrating to the point of collapse. There’s no glory in the work. No one wins a medal. And maybe someone should.

8. LEAKY SEALs

Diarrhea as a Threat to National Security

SHOULD YOU ONE DAY travel to the overlooked desert nation of Djibouti you will - фото 9

SHOULD YOU ONE DAY travel to the overlooked desert nation of Djibouti, you will see from the window, as you land, what appears to be a large construction site adjacent to the airport. In fact, it’s a US military base, Camp Lemonnier: 3,500 people who live and work in retrofitted shipping containers, some stacked, some side by side, a Tetris of unadorned rectangular boxes. Other than the shrubs that grow in the drip from the air-conditioning units, there is no landscaping. Interior décor takes the form of emergency instruction placards (“Stop and listen to the Giant Voice…”) and framed chain-of-command portraits. In three days on base, I’ve seen a single item that one might class as luxury: one indulgent, cushy, costly item shipped here for no other reason than to add a little comfort to a soldier or sailor or airman’s life. Captain Mark Riddle requisitions Charmin Ultra Soft for the container that belongs to Naval Medical Research Unit 3. The sign on the door explains it: Diarrhea Clinical Trial.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Grunt»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Grunt» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Grunt»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Grunt» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x