James Blish - Case of Conscience

“No,” Cleaver said bluntly. “I’ve never been on a commission like this before, where there was no single, definite chairman, where there was deliberately an even number of members so that a split opinion couldn’t be settled if it occurred-and where the voice of a man whose head is filled with Pecksniffian, irrelevant moral distinctions and three-thousand-year old metaphysics carries the same weight as the voice of a scientist.”

“That’s mighty loaded language, Paul,” Michelis said.

“I know it. If it comes to that, I’ll say here or anywhere that I think the Father is a hell of a fine biologist. I’ve seen him in operation, and they don’t come any better—and for that matter he may have just finished saving my life, for all any of the rest of us can tell. That makes him a scientist like the rest of us—insofar as biology’s a science.”

“Thank you,” Ruiz-Sanchez said. “With a little history in your education, Paul, you would also have known that the Jesuits were among the first explorers to enter China, and Paraguay, and the North American wilderness. Then it would have been no surprise to you to find me here.”

“That may well be. However, it has nothing to do with the paradox as I see it. I remember once visiting the labs at Notre Dame, where they have a complete little world of germ-free animals and plants and have pulled I don’t know how many physiological miracles out of the hat. I wondered then how a man goes about being as good a scientist as that, and a good Catholic at the same time—or any other kind of churchman. I wondered in which compartment in their brains they filed their religion, and in which their science. I’m still wondering.”

“They’re not compartmented,” Ruiz-Sanchez said. “They are a single whole.”

“So you said, when I brought this up before. That answers nothing; in fact, it convinced me that what I was planning to do was absolutely necessary. I didn’t propose to take any chances on the compartments getting interconnected on Lithia. I had every intention of cutting the Father down to a point where his voice would be nearly ignored by the rest of you. That’s why I undertook the cloak-and-dagger stuff. Maybe it was stupidly done—I suppose that it takes training to be a successful agent-provocateur and that I should have realized that.”

Ruiz-Sanchez wondered what Cleaver’s reaction would be when he found, as he would very shortly now, that his purpose would have been accomplished without his having to lift a finger. Of course the dedicated man of science, working for the greater glory of man, could anticipate nothing but failure; that was the fallibility of man. But would Cleaver be able to understand, through his ordeal, what had happened to Ruiz-Sanchez when he had discovered the fallibility of God? It seemed unlikely.

“But I’m not sorry I tried,” Cleaver was saying. “I’m only sorry I failed.”

There was a short, painful hiatus.

“Is that it, then?” Michelis said.

“That’s it, Mike. Oh—one more thing. My vote, if anybody is still in any doubt about it, is to keep the planet closed. Take it from there.”

“Ramon,” Michelis said, “do you want to speak next? You’re certainly entitled to it, on a point of personal privilege. The air’s a mite murky at the moment, I’m afraid.”

“No, Mike. Let’s hear from you.”

“I’m not ready to speak yet either, unless the majority wants me to. Agronski, how about you?”

“Sure,” Agronski said. “Speaking as a geologist, and also as an ordinary slob that doesn’t follow rarefied reasoning very well, I’m on Cleaver’s side. I don’t see anything either for or against the planet on any other grounds but Cleaver’s. It’s a fair planet as planets go, very quiet, not very rich in anything else we need—sure, that gchteht is marvelous stuff, but it’s strictly for the luxury trade—and not subject to any kind of trouble that I’ve been able to detect. It’d make a good way station, but so would lots of other worlds hereabouts.

“It’d also make a good arsenal, the way Cleaver defines the term. In every other category it’s as dull as ditch water, and it’s got plenty of that. The only other thing it can have to offer is titanium, which isn’t quite as scarce back home these days as Mike seems to think; and gem stones, particularly the semiprecious ones, which we can make at home without traveling fifty light-years to get them. I’d say, either set up a way station here and forget about the planet otherwise, or else handle the place as Cleaver suggested.”

“But which?” Ruiz-Sanchez asked.

“Well, which is more important, Father? Aren’t way stations a dime a dozen? Planets that can be used as thermonuclear labs, on the other hand, are rare—Lithia is the first one that can be used that way, at least in my experience. Why use a planet for a routine purpose if it’s unique? Why not apply Occam’s Razor—the law of parsimony? It works on every other scientific problem anybody’s ever tackled. It’s my bet that it’s the best tool to use on this one.”

“Occam’s Razor isn’t a natural law,” Ruiz-Sanchez said. “It’s only a heuristic convenience—in short, a learning gimmick. And besides, Agronski, it calls for the simplest solution of the problem that will fit all the facts. You don’t have all the facts, not by a long shot.”

“All right, show me,” Agronski said piously. “I’ve got an open mind.”

“You vote to close the planet, then,” Michelis said.

“Sure. That’s what I was saying, wasn’t it, Mike?”

“I wanted to have it Yes or No for the tape,” Michelis said.

“Ramon, I guess it’s up to us. Shall I speak first? I think I’m ready.”

“Of course, Mike.”

“Then,” Michelis said evenly, and without changing in the slightest his accustomed tone of grave impartiality, “I’ll say that I think both of these gentlemen are fools, and calamitous fools at that because they’re supposed to be scientists. Paul, your maneuvers to set up a phony situation are perfectly beneath contempt, and I shan’t mention them again. I shan’t even appeal to have them cut from the tape, so you needn’t feel that you have to mend any fences with me. I’m looking solely at the purpose those maneuvers were supposed to serve, just as you asked me to do.”

Cleaver’s obvious self-satisfaction began to dim a little around the edges. He said, “Go ahead,” and wound the blanket a little bit tighter around his legs.

“Lithia is not even the beginning of an arsenal,” Michelis said. “Every piece of evidence you offered to prove that it might be is either a half-truth or the purest trash. Take cheap labor, for instance. With what will you pay the Lithians? They have no money, and they can’t be rewarded with goods. They have almost everything that they need, and they like the way they’re living right now—God knows they’re not even slightly jealous of the achievements we think make Earth great. They’d like to have space flight but, given a little time, they’ll get it by themselves; they have the Coupling ion-jet right now, and they won’t be needing the Haertel overdrive for another century.”

He looked around the gently rounded room, which was shining softly in the gaslight.

“And I don’t seem to see any place in here,” he said, “where a vacuum cleaner with forty-five patented attachments would find any work to do. How will you pay the Lithians to work in your thermonuclear plants?”

“With knowledge,” Cleaver said gruffly. “There’s a lot they’d like to know.”

“But what knowledge, Paul? The things they’d like to know are specifically the things you can’t tell them, if they’re to be valuable to you as a labor force. Are you going to teach them quantum mechanics? You can’t; that would be dangerous. Are you going to teach them nucleonics, or Hilbert space, or the Haertel scholium? Again, any one of those would enable them to learn other things you think dangerous. Are you going to teach them how to extract titanium from rutile, or how to accumulate enough iron to develop a science of electrodynamics, or how to pass from this Stone Age they’re living in now—this Pottery Age, I should say—into an Age of Plastics? Of course you aren’t. As a matter of fact, we don’t have a thing to offer them in that sense. It’d all be classified under the arrangement you propose—and they just wouldn’t work for us under those terms.”