Adam Levin - The Instructions

Drucker’s pamphlets had titles like Aspects of Zionist Power in the United States and Zionists and the “Antisemitism” Cry. Those were the two that always got mentioned on the news, but there were five or six others, and one of them was called NBC, ABC, CBS, AIPAC . Whenever interviewed on television, Drucker would ask why it was that although the titles of his other pamphlets were regularly cited during newscasts, NBC, ABC, CBS, AIPAC was never mentioned. And then he would answer his first question with a second one; he would ask if the absence of the title’s mention might not be “very ironic proof” that “a small group of Zionists” was controlling all the major media outlets and “doing everything in their power to obscure the truth from the eyes of the viewing public.”

Drucker was always very careful to say “Zionists” and was not a stupid guy. When one of his interviewers responded to the media cover-up accusation by stating, “But Mr. Drucker, we’re an ABC affiliate. If this controlling group of alleged Zionists are doing what you claim they’re doing, how can you account for this broadcast?” Zucker responded like this: “You guys are out to make me look crazy, and since your so-called ‘producers’ and ‘editors’ are at the controls, you succeed to a degree. This is all pre-recorded and you do studio-tricks to my image. Anything from lowering the number of pixels per square inch in the area of my eyes so even the pupils look like an outdated video game, to simply shooting me from a slightly oblique angle which makes it appear that I am not, as they say, a ‘straightforward’ individual, not to mention sitting me on the right side of the table so I’m always leaning in what’s known as the ‘sinister’ direction to answer questions, and the way you raise the volume on my voice, and speed it up ever so slightly, and the way you ‘edit’ me, or should I say ‘censor’ me, the way you cut out portions of what I’m saying while I’m in mid-sentence… I come off like I’m disturbed, and if a disturbed man mentions my pamphlet NBC, ABC, CBS, AIPAC , the pamphlet is sure to be associated with a disturbed man, and such a man might as well be talking about a UFO sighting — you completely undercut my credibility. If one of your starry-eyed talking heads so much as even gave a list of the surnames of the men and women who run the networks, let alone the types of — if I may be permitted to scare-quote aloud—‘philanthropic’ Zionist organizations to which these men and women tithe, the implications would be examined at dinner tables all throughout Chicago, if not on a national level; but when a slightly diagonal Pat Drucker bends sinister to discuss these same executives, to alert the viewing public to the money-hungry, war-mongering Zionist cabal that’s controlling this very interview, well, it’s obvious he’s nuts, right? Cause just look at him, yeah? He’s a pixel-face!”

Drucker’s accusations about how the media undercut him were crazy in themselves, but at the same time, if you considered them for a second, you couldn’t avoid wondering if they could be true; and if it was possible that the only reason the accusations sounded crazy was because the TV networks were doing to his image what Drucker claimed they were doing, then it was also possible that all the other things Drucker had said weren’t as crazy as they might seem. His tactic made me think of that Lauryn Hill line that Flowers loved, “Even after all my logic and my theory, I add a ‘motherfucker’ so you ig’nant niggas hear me.” Lauryn’s not only telling you about what she does, but in telling you what she does, she’s doing what she tells you she does. She makes truth by saying it. Drucker wasn’t making truth when he talked about the studio-tricks, but he was making tricks. It was pretty smart of him.

That does not mean that I liked Drucker. I didn’t like Drucker, and I didn’t like that he and others like him existed. I understood why someone had to defend Drucker’s right to speak against my people, and I even understood why it was a good thing that Drucker had the right to speak against my people, but I didn’t understand why the person who rose to his defense couldn’t be one of his people. I didn’t understand why it had to be one of my people. I didn’t understand why it had to be my father. And neither did the Israelites of West Rogers Park. And so I understood why some of them vandalized our house. If I had not been Gurion, I might have vandalized our house myself.

But understanding is not the same as approval. I could have very easily understood how someone would fall in love with June, for example. And I could understand why someone in love with June would try to kiss June, but still I would not have hesitated to wreck anyone who tried to kiss June. And because he would love her, this boy who would try to kiss June, he would understand why Gurion would wreck him, and he would try to wreck Gurion for trying to kiss June. And that would have been fine with me, because that boy would not have been Gurion, and so he would’ve been unable to wreck me. And no matter what justification whoever spraypainted our stoop thought he had for spraypainting our stoop, it was the stoop of the Maccabees, and even though the meaning of the “Maccabees Aren’t” graffito was made as limp by its over-clever use of the WELCOME mat as any WAR ever tagged beneath the STOP of a stopsign, the vandal had been bold enough to climb our seven steps and crouch before our front door to convey his limp insult, and for that trespass he would have to suffer.

In the past, no vandal had ever breached our sidewalkline. They would bomb our fence or the city-owned curb, fling boxes of eggs at our greystone façade, and brick our windshields and sugar our gastanks before we built the garage off the alley, and once, when I was six, someone slung a rock through our living room window and my mother ran outside with a fireplace poker as the vandal’s squealing tires smudged lines on the street — but this was different. This time the vandal had been only a crobar and a wish away from overstepping our very threshold, and it isn’t hard at all to get hold of a crobar, and to make a wish is even easier than that, so I decided I’d stay awake at my window that night with my weapon at the ready. If I crumpled his lenses with U.S. currency, the vandal would never return.

I would first have to hide the graffito, though, so my dad wouldn’t see it and call the cops. If he called the cops, they would send a squadcar like they had in the past, and the squadcar would scare the vandal off before he got close enough for me to target properly. After a few days, the squadcar would stop coming around, and the vandal would return. It’s what always happened. And it made sense that the vandals kept returning. When a particular threat has been keeping you from doing something dangerous, and then that threat suddenly disappears, you feel twice as safe doing the dangerous thing as you felt before you ever encountered the threat, like how all the enemies of Jelly Rothstein who believed the untrue version of the Angie Destra milk-spilling/pouring incident would — once the truth revealed itself — flood into Jelly’s biting-range at a higher rate than they had before they believed the spilling was pouring. And the squadcar was a weak threat, anyway: for the squadcar to be effective, a vandal not only had to imagine what would happen to him if he got caught, but he had to imagine it was likely that he would get caught. That was too hypothetical. Even though the squadcar threat had kept the vandals at bay in the past, I knew it was too hypothetical because it wouldn’t have kept me at bay if I was one of the vandals; if I was one of the vandals, I would know that the likelihood of me getting caught would be very low, and I would do what I came to do. That the vandals of the past were cowards without stealth, or maybe just cowards with no faith in their stealth, was only a matter of chance. And who knew what kind of person the vandal who bombed my stoop with “Maccabees Aren’t” was? Was he like me, or was he like those who’d vandalized us in the past? He was probably not so much like the ones from the past, I thought, because the ones from the past never breached the sidewalkline. But even if he was like those other vandals, he would, like those other vandals, come back once the squadcar was gone. So I knew the new vandal would eventually return, and I knew that other vandals would follow, unless, maybe, the new vandal was marked with something that required little imagination, like blindness. If while bombing the Maccabeean stoop you were made unable to see, you would be unable to bomb the stoop again, and those who’d learn what you’d been up to when you were blinded wouldn’t have to use their imaginations so terribly much, because there you’d be, before them; falling all over the place while learning to walk with a stick and a dog, your shirt scabby with foodsmears you didn’t even know about. You would be marked by Gurion ben-Judah as a penalty for vandalizing his family’s property, and all the vandals would give witness.