Liuping Wang - PID Control System Design and Automatic Tuning using MATLAB/Simulink

The plant information obtained from the test includes the steady-state gain, defined as

(1.45)

Figure 1.14 Step response data. (a) Input signal. (b) Output signal. Key: line (1) the output response; line (2) steady-state output position before the response ( ); line (3) steady-state output position in completion of the response ( ).

The time delay is shown in the figure, which is the delayed time when the output responds to the change in the input signal. The parameter time delay reflects the situation that the output response remains unchanged despite the step input signal being injected. Thus, it is estimated using the time difference between when the step reference change occurred ( for this figure) and when the output response moved away from its steady-state value (see the time interval in Figure 1.14(b) marked with the first set of arrows). A line with maximum slope is drawn on Figure 1.14(b), which is intersected with the line corresponding to the indicator of . The intersecting point shown in Figure 1.14(b) determines the value of that is a measurement of the dynamic response time.

Alternatively, because the step response of a first order system ( ) to a unit step input signal can be expressed as

and when the variable time ,

thus, we can determine the time constant using 63.2% of the rising time in the step response. This estimation of time constant gives a different value from the case when using the maximum slope approach. For the majority of the applications, this will result in a smaller time constant , and from the empirical tuning rules stated in the later part of the section, a smaller proportional gain will follow. One can evaluate this approach as an exercise using Problem 1.2.

Essentially, the step response test gives the parameters in the first order plus delay description of the process as in (1.44).

There is a second set of Ziegler–Nichols tuning rules that is based on the plant step response test data. This is also called the Ziegler–Nichols tuning rules using reaction curve. With these parameters, Ziegler–Nichols tuning rules using a reaction curve are given in Table 1.2. By the nature of this testing procedure (open-loop testing), the tuning rules should apply to stable systems.

Table 1.2 Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules with a reaction curve.

P
PI
PID

Table 1.3 Cohen–Coon tuning rules with a reaction curve.

P
PI
PID

There is another set of tuning rules that are derived based on the reaction curve, termed Cohen and Coon tuning rules. Table 1.3gives the PID controller parameters calculated from Cohen and Coon tuning rules.