J. Anthony Fraunhofer - The ADA Practical Guide to Dental Implants

( Source : Based on United States Census Bureau. Release Number CB20‐99: 65 and Older Population Grows Rapidly as Baby Boomers Age. Washington, DC, June 25, 2020).

Figure 1.2Prevalence of edentulism by race and ethnicity in adults ≥65 years [9].

( Source : Based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Edentulism and tooth retention. Atlanta, Ga., September 10, 2019).

According to the American College of Prosthodontics, more than 35 million Americans are edentulous, and 178 million people are missing at least one tooth and these numbers are expected to grow over the next two decades [8].

What is distressing about these statistics is that edentulism affects our most vulnerable populations – the aging and the economically disadvantaged, Fig. 1.2. In the geriatric population, for example, the ratio of edentulous to dentate individuals is 2 : 1, with about 23 million being completely edentulous and some 12 million are edentulous in one arch. About 90% of edentulous patients have dentures and some 15% of edentulous patients will have dentures made each year [8].

The consequences of partial or complete edentulism are well‐known and include many facets of the quality of life (QoL) as well as facial appearance, self‐image and self‐confidence. Overall, health consequences of edentulism encompass significant nutritional changes, digestive issues, obesity, diabetes, and coronary artery disease to name but a few.

Although there have been minor variations over the past few years, the current life expectancy for the U.S. population in 2020 is 78.93 years [10], and we can anticipate increases in tooth failures. Vertical root fractures, endodontic failures, restorative failures, and periodontal disease may result in tooth loss. In contrast to the practice of dentistry in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, modern dentistry focuses on the replacement of lost teeth utilizing implants, combined with comprehensive analysis of function and esthetics.

In modern dentistry, the dental implant is the best tooth replacement option for nearly all situations where a tooth is missing or is failing. The primary reason for this is the extremely high success rate achieved with dental implants. Saving teeth at all costs is no longer the norm because of the unpredictability of the longevity of heroic dentistry. In other words, preserving bone and tissue regeneration are now considered to be more important than trying to prolong tooth retention. This approach not only promotes bone healing and preservation but ensures that implants are placed in a predictable and solid bony environment with a high rate of success.

The consensus regarding dental implants within the international dental community can be summarized in Table 1.1. Whereas the order of the comments may vary with the individual clinician, most would agree that these comments are valid and pertinent.

Over 32 million people in the U.S. wear partial or CDs [11] and approximately 33% of these patients complain that their dentures fit poorly, tend to loosen or dislodge during activities such as chewing and laughing, and/or there is pain on mastication. Flat ridges and/or shallow palatal vaults add to denture retention and instability problems and most dentists are aware that the mandibular CD presents retention issues.

Table 1.1Advantages of dental implants.

Limitations and/or restrictions on diet, especially which foods can or cannot be eaten, also play a major role in the decision to seek dental implants. It is likely that a significant percentage of those patients experiencing pain or discomfort on chewing will not use their dentures during eating. Due to the decreased mastication forces associated with dentures, edentulous patients have been found to consume less food and have lower intakes of protein, intrinsic and milk sugars, non‐starch polysaccharides (fibrous matter), calcium, non‐heme iron, niacin and vitamin C than dentate people [12]. These dietary deficiencies often have significant adverse effects on overall health and wellbeing, as well as their QoL.

Many patients will resort to utilizing denture adhesives to aid in retention. These adhesives may lead to further problems as they are extremely difficult to remove from the tissues. Impaired speech patterns as well as halitosis (oral malodor or “denture breath”) are frequent complaints among denture wearers, even when the fit of the denture is not a significant issue.

It follows from the above, that patients seek dental implant therapy for a number of reasons, including the following:

Function

Esthetics

Comfort

Confidence

Facial appearance

General dental practitioners can address these issues and assist the patient in achieving oral health and functionality lost through missing teeth.

There are two major implant treatment modalities for the edentulous patient:

1 Implant over‐dentures. Implant overdentures are removable appliances which are both implant and tissue‐borne prostheses. They utilize an abutment and a denture attachment for the retention ( Fig. 1.3). These appliances solve several major problems with traditional dentures by allowing:Increased masticatory forcesIncreased retention to potentially eliminate the need for denture adhesivesRemoval of palatal coverage for patients who cannot tolerate the denture due to their gag reflexAn implant‐supported denture is a satisfactory and viable economic alternative to the traditional CD.Screw‐retained fixed implant bridges. Fixed implant bridges are implant‐borne prostheses which are not removable by the patient. They are manufactured in zirconia or in acrylic overlaying a chrome‐cobalt or titanium bar. These appliances give patients the greatest masticatory forces and are more appealing to most patients because they are fixed in place.

As stated above, 178 million people in the U.S. are missing at least one tooth [11]. Before the use of dental implants, fixed partial dentures (bridges) or RPDs were utilized. One major problem with these treatment modalities is that fewer teeth are taking the load. For example, in the case of a four‐unit fixed bridge, only two teeth are carrying the load of the four teeth it restores because the pontics provide no functional support.

Figure 1.3Implant‐supported overdenture.

Source : Courtesy of Zest Anchor.

The advantages for placing an implant and restoring it to replace a missing, free‐standing tooth are summarized in Table 1.2.

Table 1.2Advantages of implants replacing individual teeth.

Dentists are accustomed to replacing multiple missing teeth with a RPD. In fact, RPDs have been a viable treatment option for decades. While they serve a recognizable and useful purpose, they do require some skill and much experience in regard to their design and fabrication.