Ив Жангра - Ошибки в оценке науки, или как правильно использовать библиометрию [калибрятина]

D. D. Guttenplan, “Questionable science behind academic rankings,” in New York Times , 15 November, 2010, доступно по адресу: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/15/education/15iht-educLede15.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.

Вернуться

157

http://www.topuniversities.com/node/4414/ranking-details/world-niversity-rankings/2012.

Вернуться

158

См.: Martin Enserink, “Who ranks the university rankers?” in Science , 317, 24 August, 2007, pp. 1026–1028.

Вернуться

159

Mathilde Munos, “Classement de Shanghai des universités: ‘La France grignote des places’ (Fioraso),” in France Info , 15 August, 2013; http://www.franceinfo.fr/education-jeunesse/les-invites-de-france-info/classement-de-shanghai-des-universites-la-france-grignote-des-places-fiora.

Вернуться

160

Категория «высокоцитируемые исследователи» ( highly cited researchers ) была введена для обозначения 1 % наиболее часто цитирующихся статей, учитываемых в индексах научного цитирования (рассчитывается за определенный период для различных областей науки).

Вернуться

161

Yudhijit Bhattacharjee, “Saudi Universities Offer Cash in Exchange for Academic Prestige,” Science 334, December 9, 2011, pp. 1344–1345. См. также многочисленные реакции в: Science 335, March 2, 2012, pp. 1040–1042 и на их сайте, http://comments.sciencemag.org/content/10.1126/science.334.6061.1344, дата доступа: 15 декабря 2015 г.

Вернуться

162

Здесь я ссылаюсь на публикацию Thomson Reuters “2014 HCR as of September 8, 2015,” см.: http://highlycited.com, дата доступа: 21 декабря 2015 г.

Вернуться

163

Étienne Gless, “Ipag: Les secrets d’une progression ‘fulgurante’ en recherche,” L’Etudiant.fr, October 9, 2014, http://www.letudiant.fr/educpros/enquetes/ipag-les-secrets-d-une-progression-fulgurante-en-recherche.html.

Вернуться

164

EFMDP Quality Improvement System, EQUIS Standards and Criteria , January 2014, p. 64, https://www.efmd.org/images/stories/efmd/EQUIS/2014/EQUIS_Standards_and_Criteria.pdf.

Вернуться

165

См.: Sébastien Mosbah-Natanson, Yves Gingras, “The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009),” in Current Sociology , 62 (5), 2014, pp. 626–646.

Вернуться

166

William Bruneau, Donald C. Savage, Counting Out the Scholars: How Performance Indicators Undermine Universities and Colleges (Toronto: James Lorimer, 2002).

Вернуться

167

Stanford G. Thatcher, “The Crisis in Scholarly Communication,” in Chronicle of Higher Education, 1995, March 3, B1–B2; Carol Tenopir, Donald W. King, “Trends in Scientific Scholarly Journal Publishing in the United States,” in Journal of Scholarly Publishing , 1997, 28 (3), pp. 135–170; Glenn S. McGuigan, Robert D. Russel, “The business of academic publishing: A strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing,” in Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship , 9 (3), http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v09n03/mcguigan_g01.html; Vincent Larivière, Stefanie Haustein, and Philippe Mongeon, “The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era,” in PLoS ONE , 2015, 10 (6), e0127502.

Вернуться

168

Mikael Laakso, Patrik Welling, Helena Bukvova, Linus Nyma, Bo-Christer Björk, and Turid Hedlund, “The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009,” in PLoS ONE , 2011, 6 (6), e20961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961.

Вернуться

169

Zoe Corbyn, “Retractions up tenfold,” in Times Higher Education , 2009, (20 August), https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/retractions-up-tenfold/407838.article; Richard van Noorden, “Brazilian citation scheme outed. Thomson Reuters suspends journals from its rankings for ‘citation stacking.’” in Nature , 2013, 500 (29 August), pp. 510–551; Charlotte J.Haug, “Peer-Review Fraud – Hacking the Scientific Publication Process,” in New England Journal of Medicine , 2015, 373 (17 December), pp. 2393–2395; Jeffrey Beal, “Predatory journals: Ban predators from the scientific record,” in Nature, 534 (16 June).

Вернуться

170

T. D. Wilson, “The Nonsense of ‘Knowledge Management’,” in Information Research , 2002, 8 (1), http://InformationR.net/ir/8-1/paper144.html; Michael Power, “The Audit Society – Second Thoughts,” in International Journal of Auditing , 2000, 4 (1), pp. 111–119.

Вернуться

171

Jonathan R. Cole, Steven Cole, Social Stratification of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973).

Вернуться

172

Pierre Bourdieu, “Forms of Capital,” in J. E. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory of Research for the Sociology of Education (New York: Greenwood Press, 1986), pp. 241–258; Pierre Bourdieu, Science of Science and Reflexivity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).

Вернуться

173

Bruno Latour, Steven Woolgar, “The Cycle of Credibility,” in Barry Barnes and David Edge (eds), Science in Context. Readings in the Sociology of Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982), pp. 34–43.

Вернуться

174

Harriet Zuckerman, Robert K. Merton, “Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalization, Structure, and Functions of the Referee System,” in Minerva, 1971, 9, pp. 66–100; Daryl E. Chubin, Edward J. Hackett, Peerless Science. Peer Review and US Science Policy (Albany: SUNY Press, 1990); Mario Biagioli, “From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review,” in Emergences, 2002, 12 (1), pp. 11–45; David Abraham Kronick, “Devant le deluge” and Other Essays on Early Modern Scientific Communication (Lanham, MD: Scarecrow, 2004); Lewis Pyenson, “Physical Sense in Relativity: Max Planck edits the Annalen der Physik, 1906–1918,” in Annalen der Physik , 2008, 17 (2–3), pp. 176–189.

Вернуться

175

Thane Gustafson, “The Controversy Over Peer Review,” in Science , 1975, 190 (12 December), pp. 1060–1066.

Вернуться

176

Drummond Rennie, “Let’s make peer review scientific,” in Nature , 2016, 535 (7 July), pp. 31–33.

Вернуться

177

См.: Yves Gingras, Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation. Uses and Abuses (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2016).

Вернуться

178

Isabelle Bruno, Emmanuel Didier, Benchmarking: L’État sous pression statistique (Paris: La Découverte, 2013).

Вернуться

179

Nicholas Wade, “Citation Analysis: A New Tool for Science Administrators,” in Science , 1975, 4187, pp. 429–432.