“I will typically say something like, ‘That person does have a beard like Dada,’ but I’m not going to say, ‘Yup, that’s a dad,’ because that would be assuming the person’s gender identity. We’re laying the foundation for having more complex conversations in the future. All I can do now is narrate the world how I want them to experience it.” 357It’s a tragedy people like this are allowed to raise children, but this is what the liberals are doing.
BuzzFeed interviewed two lesbians who are raising “their” son after one of them got artificially inseminated, and one of the women appeared to be uncomfortable that the boy likes doing boy things, and said she is “constantly trying to queer her relationship with him and get him to wear [ballerina] tutus.” 358
She also expressed frustration with the child because when looking at books he’ll point to a picture of a boy or a girl and say, “boy” or “girl” so she “corrects” him, saying that they’re not boys or girls, but instead it’s a gender neutral “child,” because, “This is where he starts learning what things are. And so I hate the idea that he’s getting it imprinted on him that people who look like this are boys, and people who look like that are girls. Everyone needs to be reconsidering the way that they’re presenting gender to their kids.” 359
One woman in California named Lori Duran, wrote a book in 2013 titled Raising My Rainbow: Adventures in Raising a Fabulous, Gender Creative Son , detailing how she was raising her son to be gender neutral, and said he preferred wearing girls clothes and would rather sew than play soccer. Actor Neil Patrick Harris (a homosexual) wrote the foreword for her book. Bravo talk show host Andy Cohen (who is also gay) called it, “A powerful book at the right time.” 360It has a four and a half star rating on Amazon from liberals who love it and call her a “wonderful mother” who gives readers “an inside look into the struggles and joys of raising a child who goes against the norms of society.” 361
Gender Neutral Baby Names
If you thought the Cultural Marxist liberals would be satisfied once boys were wearing makeup and dresses, you are wrong. Not only do they have disdain for the traditional gender roles in the family, styles of dress, and differentiating between boys and girls because of their genetics, but they are upset about the very names that boys and girls are given. They want a world where girls are named Frank, and where boys are named Tiffany.
Since celebrities largely shape the social fabric of society in our Media Age, now many Millennials are following their lead and naming their children gender-neutral baby names. Dead Pool star Ryan Reynolds and his wife Blake Lively named their daughter “James.” 362Hillary Duff’s sister, who is a lesser-known actress named Haylie Duff, named her daughter “Ryan,” and was praised for defying gender conventions. 363Other, lesser-known actors are also doing the same. 364
The parenting website BabyCenter, which is a large forum of parents, said there are more conversations today supporting “unisex” names. 365And as the gender-bending fetish continues to spread we’ll likely see baby girls named Bob, and boys named Brooke. There is literally no end to the depths of depravity these people are trying to unleash on society. And the damage being inflicted on these innocent children is immeasurable.
Cosmopolitan magazine wants all children raised gender neutral too. In the summer of 2017 they published an article titled “Dear Parents-to-Be: Stop Celebrating Your Baby’s Gender,” complaining about soon-to-be parents having “gender reveal parties” that were created by the “baby industrial complex.” The writer, a proud feminist, said she “cannot stomach” them and, “Cutting into a pink or blue cake seems innocent enough—but honestly, it’s not.” 366
She went on to say that the parties were “potentially damaging” to the children and continued on into the usual diatribe about how “gender is different from sex,” whining, “For starters, gender-reveal parties don’t actually reveal gender—they reveal anatomy. Gender is a wholly different thing, inextricably tied to the social constructs around it.” She then went on to say that the reason we associate pink with girls is because of Adolf Hitler. “Hitler—yes, Hitler—feminized the color pink by forcing gays to wear triangles in that shade during World War II,” she writes. 367
Yes, she really blamed Hitler for pink being feminine, and argued that since there are people who identify as transgender or neither gender (or one of the other 500 they’ve come up with by now) gender reveal parties aren’t “inclusive” enough because they leave out a cross-section of the population.
The article quotes an intersex baker who gets “queasy” from parents-to-be coming into the bakery and ordering gender reveal cakes for their parties. “The popularity of gender-reveal parties speaks to how powerful and central this binary is to our sense of identity,” she says. “Still, they make me a little queasy. By collapsing gender expression, gender identity, and sex, you’re doing everyone a disservice, because no one buys into the whole package all the time.” 368
Another feminist blog ranted against gender reveal parties, calling them a sham. “They’re a reinforcement of binary gender. Despite the mainstream trans visibility and gay rights movements, gender reveals show that we are traditionalists who are eager to amplify dominant cultural narratives. It still belies an obsession with fitting people into one of two neat categories—Pistols or Pearls — and imposes gendered traits and behaviors before a child has even left the womb.” 369
The misfit goes on to say, “Celebrating that your baby is destined to either experience a lifetime of emotional suppression while being encouraged to be violent and self-serving or be treated as a second-class citizen with avenues of opportunity withheld, strikes me as a tad macabre—but maybe I’m just bad at getting into the spirit of these things.” 370
She concludes, “Catering to this hope, or rather fear, is profitable. Between the baked goods, party favors, and event planning that goes into these affairs, capitalism is supporting cisnormative narratives as usual while making money off the whole thing. It’s a nice, symbiotic relationship between data-mining social media, bakers with blue-and-pink frosting, and jittery cis parents wishing with all their hearts that their baby’s gender comes down to a simple coin flip that will remain unchallenged throughout the child’s life. Ultimately it boils down to just wanting the best for your baby, in a particularly trans-antagonistic way.” 371
A Formula One race car driver named Lewis Hamilton posted a brief video of his three-year-old nephew on Christmas morning wearing a “Princess Dress” where he asked the boy why he was wearing it and told him that boys don’t wear princess dresses. He wasn’t mean, or yelling at the kid, he was genuinely confused as to why his nephew was wearing a dress.
The PC police went nuts, claiming he was “bullying” the kid. The Huffington Post ran the headline, “Lewis Hamilton Mocks Nephew For Wearing A ‘Princess Dress’ On Christmas,” 372and other Leftist websites jumped on the story. He quickly deleted the video and issued an apology, saying, “Yesterday I was playing around with my nephew and realized that my words were inappropriate so I removed the post. I meant no harm and did not mean to offend anyone at all. I love that my nephew feels free to express himself as we all should.” 373
Читать дальше