Mary Roach - Grunt

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Mary Roach - Grunt» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Город: New York, Год выпуска: 2016, ISBN: 2016, Издательство: W. W. Norton, Жанр: nonf_military, sci_popular, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Grunt: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Grunt»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

Best-selling author Mary Roach explores the science of keeping human beings intact, awake, sane, uninfected, and uninfested in the bizarre and extreme circumstances of war.
Grunt
Tennessee
An Amazon Best Book of June 2016:
Amazon.com Review It takes a special kind of writer to make topics ranging from death to our gastrointestinal tract interesting (sometimes hilariously so), and pop science writer Mary Roach is always up to the task. In her latest book,
, she explores how our soldiers combat their non-gun-wielding opponents—panic, heat exhaustion, the runs, and more. It will give you a new appreciation not only for our men and women in uniform (and by the way, one of the innumerable things you’ll learn is how and why they choose the fabric for those uniforms), but for the unsung scientist-soldiers tasked with coming up with ways to keep the “grunts” alive and well. If you are at all familiar with Roach’s oeuvre, you know her enthusiasm for her subjects is palpable and infectious. This latest offering is no exception.
—Erin Kodicek,
“A mirthful, informative peek behind the curtain of military science.” (Washington Post)
“From the ever-illuminating author of
and
comes an examination of the science behind war. Even the tiniest minutiae count on the battlefield, and Roach leads us through her discoveries in her inimitable style.” (Elle)
“Mary Roach is one of the best in the business of science writing… She takes readers on a tour of the scientists who attempt to conquer the panic, exhaustion, heat, and noise that plague modern soldiers.” (Brooklyn Magazine)
“Extremely likable … and quick with a quip…. [Roach’s] skill is to draw out the good humor and honesty of both the subjects and practitioners of these white arts among the dark arts of war.” (San Francisco Chronicle)
“Nobody does weird science quite like [Roach], and this time, she takes on war. Though all her books look at the human body in extreme situations (sex! space! death!), this isn’t simply a blood-drenched affair. Instead, Roach looks at the unexpected things that take place behind the scenes.” (Wired)
“Brilliant.” (Science)
“Roach … applies her tenacious reporting and quirky point of view to efforts by scientists to conquer some of the soldier’s worst enemies.” (Seattle Times)
“Covering these topics and more, Roach has done a fascinating job of portraying unexpected, creative sides of military science.” (New York Post)
“Having investigated sex, death, and preparing for space travel,
best-selling Roach applies her thorough—and thoroughly entertaining—techniques to the sobering subject of keeping soldiers not just alive but alert and healthy of mind and body during warfare.” (Library Journal)
“A rare literary bird, a best selling science writer … Roach avidly and impishly infiltrates the world of military science…. Roach is exuberantly and imaginatively informative and irreverently funny, but she is also in awe of the accomplished and committed military people she meets.” (Booklist (starred review))

Grunt — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Grunt», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

THE AUTOPSY room smells like summer. The exhaust system has an air intake from outside, explains AFMES public affairs officer Paul Stone, who is taking me around this afternoon. “They just mowed the grass out there.” The room is large enough to accommodate twenty-two autopsies at once. Stone was here the week a Chinook helicopter was shot down in Afghanistan, killing thirty-eight people and a military working dog. Then, it smelled like jet fuel and burned flesh, so powerfully that Stone’s dry cleaner charged him double. “He said, ‘What were you doing ?’” Stone used to be a spokesperson at the Office of the Secretary of Defense. It’s tough to rattle him. At one point I asked if people tell him he looks like Vladimir Putin, and not even that did it.

At the peak of the Iraq war, twenty or thirty bodies passed through this room each week. Since 2004, around six thousand autopsies have taken place here. Every person (and dog) who dies in the service of the US military is autopsied. It was not always this way. Before 2001, autopsies were reserved for cases in which there was no witness to the death, or the cause was not obvious. Stone gives the example of a suspected homicide, then pauses. “Though technically it’s all homicide.” Homicide , from the Latin homo , for man, and - cidium , the act of killing. He means murder: prosecutable homicide.

Six thousand homo s cidium ed in the prime of their lives. What does this job do to a person? For one thing, it makes him very tired of that question. “We’re doctors, and these are our patients,” was the stock answer I got. I imagine it’s a tough kind of doctor to be. Most people study medicine with the hope and intent that their work will restore health, end pain, extend lives. Save lives. Because of Feedback to the Field, the work of these medical examiners does save lives. But not the ones they interact with day to day.

Stone brings me over to the H. T. Harcke Radiology Suite, where dead men and women are given CT scans. A whole-body CT is a heavy dose of radiation, but the dead don’t have to worry. Certain things like bullet trajectories and angles of entry are easier to see in the clean, gray-scale imagery of a CT scan than they are in a flesh-and-blood autopsy. Colonel Harcke himself is on hand to show me the basics of forensic radiopathology. He is the Harcke for whom the lab is named. I assumed that this was in tribute to his pioneering contributions to the field. “There’s two ways that happens,” he says when I mention it. “Die or give two million dollars. I’ll let you figure out which it is.”

Using a mouse, Harcke scrolls through the topography of an anonymous body. As we travel from scalp to boot heel, IED fragments flare like supernovae. Metal reads as bright white against the grays of muscle, blood, and bone. [62] Usually the victim’s, but occasionally a fragment from a suicide bomber. According to Stone, there has not been a documented case in which a piece of a terrorist’s bone was the cause of death. (Medical examiners do not use the term “organic shrapnel.” That originated in Falling Man author Don DeLillo’s cranium.) The contrast is stark and telling. In the face of velocitized steel, even the strongest among us are mush. Fragility is evident even in the terms MEs use— soft tissue, an eggshelled skull .

On the way back to Stone’s office, we stop to talk with Pete Seguin, the statistics guy. On his desk is a sheaf of photographs, printouts of the cases from the combat mortality meeting. “They don’t look real,” he says of the bodies. “They’re like dolls.” I’m not sure where he’s buying his dolls. I look at Stone.

“He means porcelain dolls,” Stone says. “The white skin.” Seguin explains lividity, the pooling of blood in a corpse. When the pump shuts down, gravity takes over. Because the dead are transported on their backs, they come to autopsy white as geishas, the blood drained from the face, chest, the tops of the legs.

“But then you see them back there…” Seguin means in the autopsy room. “That’s a whole different experience. It’s too sad.” I can barely hear him. “These are all young people. Our kids. It makes you ask questions. Like, Was it worth it?”

In the autopsy room there’s a pair of platformed aluminum stepladders on wheels. I thought the ceiling was being repaired. “No, it’s for perspective,” Stone had said. The autopsy photographers need to get up high to get the whole body in the frame. I guess war is like that. A thousand points of light, as they say. Only when you step back and view the sum, only then are you able to grasp the worth, the justification for the extinguishing of any single point. Right at the moment, it’s tough to get that perspective. It’s tough to imagine a stepladder high enough.

Acknowledgments

This book began with an email from a reader: Brad Harper, a retired Army pathologist. In the course of our correspondence, I mentioned I’d been toying with the idea of a book on military science but had assumed that access would trip me up. Should I try it anyway? Yes, insisted Harper. He brought me to the military morgue in Dover and introduced me to colleagues. He took me to USUHS to see his friend Sharon Holland, who has contacts all over the military medical world. When I allowed that one of the things I wished to write about was genital trauma, Holland did not flinch. She picked up the phone and called James Jezior at Walter Reed. Hey, Jim, might you have a surgery this writer could observe? Yes, said Jezior. Though he’d need to ask the patient. And surely here would be my first no: Hey, Captain White, could some strange writer lady come out and watch your operation? But White, too, said yes.

And so it went. Over and over, when the easy answer, the sane answer, was no, people said yes.

Hey, Jerry Lamb, ridiculously busy technical director at the Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory, could you find someone to approve my spending a few days at sea on a Trident submarine? Though it’ll take fourteen months and two-hundred-some emails to make it happen? Yes, said Lamb.

And might that submarine be yours, Chris Bohner and Nathan Murray of the USS Tennessee? Though I’ll be traipsing through the missile silos with no security clearance? Yes, they said. Bring your notebook and your dingbat questions. Kick Kedrowski out of his rack. Tie up the head every morning.

Hello, Mark Riddle, could I follow you to Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti, even though it means you’ll have to escort me all day every day for an entire week? And then later will you spend your holidays reviewing my manuscript?

Hey, Randy Coates, and hey, Rick Redett, I hear you’re doing some cadaver trials. Could I join you?

Hey, Kit Lavell, hey, Eric Fallon, could you work me into combat simulations where I don’t belong?

Again and again, I expected to hear no , yet yes was what I got. These fine people put their reputations on the line. They spent time they could not spare. They spoke openly on issues more comfortably left alone. For all of this—to all of you—I am deeply, humbly, gobsmackedly grateful.

I have no background in medicine or the military, and this fact made me an exasperating, time-sucking presence in people’s days. Certain individuals must be thanked for the hours spent explaining their work and, in some cases, the most basic elements of the science: Rob Dean, Christine DesLauriers, Molly Williams, Benjamin Potter, and Stacy and Mark Fidler at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center; Doug Brungart, Ben Sheffield, George Peck, Dan Szumlas, and Pete Weina at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research; Natalie Pomerantz, Sam Cheuvront, Peggy Auerbach, Rick Stevenson, and Annette LaFleur at US Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center; Alan Hough and Eric Nabors at the US Navy Submarine School; Kate Couturier, Ray Woolrich, and Shawn Soutiere at Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory; Dianna Purvis, Patty Deuster, and Dale Smith at Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Mark Roman at Aberdeen Proving Ground; Ken Tarcza, Jason Tice, and Patti Rippa of the Warrior Injury Assessment Manikin project; Nicole Brockhoff in the Office of the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation; Aaron Hall and Dave Regis at the Naval Medical Research Center; Theodore Harcke and Edward Mazuchowski at the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System; John Clark of the Royal Navy, and Michael White. I came to you all as an ignoramus and an outsider, and you treated me as neither.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Grunt»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Grunt» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Grunt»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Grunt» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x