Andrea Dworkin - Right-wing Women
Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Andrea Dworkin - Right-wing Women» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Жанр: Старинная литература, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.
- Название:Right-wing Women
- Автор:
- Жанр:
- Год:неизвестен
- ISBN:нет данных
- Рейтинг книги:4 / 5. Голосов: 2
-
Избранное:Добавить в избранное
- Отзывы:
-
Ваша оценка:
- 80
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Right-wing Women: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация
Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Right-wing Women»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.
Right-wing Women — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком
Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Right-wing Women», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.
Интервал:
Закладка:
being placed in what are presumably therapeutic institutions. The
overuse of potent medications in nursing homes is a scandal in itself. Thousands of facilities in every state of the nation fail to meet minimal government standards of sanitation, staffing, or patient
care. The best governmental estimate is that roughly half the na
tion’s nursing homes are ‘substandard. ’”4 In 1978, according to
Vladeck, there were still nursing homes “with green meat and
maggots in the kitchen, narcotics in unlocked cabinets, and disconnected sprinklers in nonfire-resistant structures. ” 5 Over 72 percent of the nursing home population is female. Women in nursing
homes are generally widows or never married, white, poorer than
most of their peers (70 percent having incomes under $3000 a year
consisting mainly of Social Security benefits), and have several
chronic diseases. According to The New York Times (October 14,
1979), the average age of the person in such an institution is 82 and
50 percent have no family, get no visitors, and are supported by
government money. Conditions are most terrible in nursing homes
supported by government funding of patient care: nursing homes
for the destitute, for those on Medicaid. The policy of the United
States government is that old people must become paupers: * spend
any money of their own that they have, after which the government takes over; the paupers are unable to defend themselves
*See “Loose Laws Make Care of Aged Costly, ” by Gertrude Dubrovsky,
The New York Times , October 21, 1979. In a subsection called “How the
Programs W ork, ” Dubrovsky explains:
“As of April 1977, the last period for which such figures were available,
a nursing-home patient under Medicaid could not have an income greater
than $533. 39 a month. However, should this same person want to remain
at home and receive community-based health-related services, his monthly
income must be less than $200.
“Thus, Medicaid laws are biased in favor of institutional care.
“Morever, Medicaid imposes strict personal-asset limits of $ 1 , 500 for a
single person or $ 2 , 500 for a couple.
“To be accepted by a nursing home under Medicaid, a person must sell
his home, liquidate his assets and turn them over to Medicaid as a gift, in
which case he stays on Medicaid.
“Or, he may give the funds directly to the nursing home as a private
payment until the money falls below the allowable level. When that happens, the patient reapplies for Medicaid, but may be put on a waiting list. ”
against the conditions in the homes in which they are kept. Once
paupers, they must accept confinement on the state’s terms because
they have no money and nowhere to go. The state’s terms all too
frequently are neglect, degradation, filth, and not infrequently outright sadism.
The nursing home population is markedly white. Blacks die
younger than whites in the United States— perhaps the result of
systematic racism, which means inadequate health care, shelter,
and money over a lifetime. Blacks alone comprise a full 11. 8 percent of the U . S. population and yet only 9 percent of the old are people of color, including Asians, Native Americans, and Hispanics. N ationally, so-called nonwhites (including blacks) comprise
only 5 percent of the nursing home population. In New Jersey, for
instance, according to The New York Times (October 21, 1979), out
of 8, 683 beds in eighty nursing homes, blacks occupied 532 and
Hispanics or “others” occupied 38 (6. 5 percent). It seems that
blacks especially are left to suffer the diseases of old age on their
own and to die on their own; and that whites are institutionally
maintained in appalling conditions— kept alive but barely. If this is
true, the social function of nursing homes becomes clearer: out of
sight, out of mind. Blacks are already invisible in ghettos— young,
middle-aged, old. Black women have been socially segregated and
marginalized all their lives. Perceptions of their suffering are easily
avoided by an already callous white-supremacist populace, the so-
called mainstream. It is white women who have become poor and
extraneous with old age; they are taken from mainstream communities where they are useless and dumped in nursing homes. It is important to keep them away from those eager, young, middle-class white women who might be demoralized at what is in store
for them once they cease to be useful. Kept in institutions until
they die as a punishment for having lived so long, for having outlived their sex-appropriate work, old white women find themselves drugged (6 . 1 prescriptions for an average patient, more than half
the patients given drugs like Thorazine and Mellaril); sick from
neglect with bedsores, urinary, eye, and ear infections; left lying in
their own filth, tied into so-called geriatric chairs or tied into bed;
sometimes not fed, not given heat, not given any nursing care;
sometimes left in burning baths (from which there have been
drownings); sometimes beaten and left with broken bones. Even in
old age, a woman had better have a man to protect her. She has
earned no place in society on her own. With a man, she will most
likely not end up in a prison for the female old. She has more social
value if she has a man, no matter how old she is—and she will also
have more money. After a lifetime of systematic economic discrimination—no pay for housekeeping, lower pay for salaried work, lower Social Security benefits, often with no rights to her husband’s pension or other benefits even after decades of marriage if he has left her—a woman alone is virtually resourceless. The euphemistically named “displaced homemaker” foreshadows the old woman who is put away.
The drugging of the predominantly female nursing home population continues in old age a pattern established with awful frequency among women: women get 60 to 80 percent of the prescriptions for mood-altering drugs (60 percent of the prescriptions for barbiturates, 67 percent for tranquilizers, and 80 percent for
amphetamines). Women are prescribed more than twice the drugs
that men are for the same psychological conditions. One study of
women in Utah, cited by Muriel Nellis in The Female Fix , “showed
Читать дальшеИнтервал:
Закладка:
Похожие книги на «Right-wing Women»
Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Right-wing Women» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.
Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Right-wing Women» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.