Celia Lury - Problem Spaces

130 118

131 119

132 120

133 121

134 122

135 123

136 124

137 125

138 126

139 127

140 128

141 129

142 130

143 131

144 132

145 133

146 134

147 135

148 136

149 137

150 138

151 139

152 140

153 214

154 215

155 141

156 142

157 143

158 144

159 145

160 146

161 147

162 148

163 149

164 150

165 151

166 152

167 153

168 154

169 155

170 156

171 157

172 158

173 159

174 160

175 161

176 162

177 163

178 164

179 165

180 166

181 167

182 168

183 169

184 170

185 171

186 172

187 173

188 174

189 175

190 176

191 177

192 216

193 217

194 218

195 219

196 178

197 179

198 180

199 181

200 182

201 183

202 184

203 185

204 186

205 187

206 188

207 189

208 190

209 191

210 192

211 193

212 194

213 195

214 196

215 197

216 198

217 199

218 200

219 220

220 221

221 222

222 201

223 202

224 203

225 204

226 205

227 223

228 224

229 225

230 226

231 227

232 228

233 229

234 230

235 231

236 232

237 233

238 234

239 235

240 236

241 237

242 238

243 239

244 240

245 241

246 242

247 243

248 244

249 245

250 246

251 247

252 248

253 249

254 250

255 251

256 252

257 253

258 254

259 255

260 256

261 257

262 258

263 259

264 260

265 261

266 262

Celia Lury

polity

Copyright © Celia Lury 2021

The right of Celia Lury to be identified as Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

First published in 2021 by Polity Press

Polity Press

65 Bridge Street

Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK

Polity Press

101 Station Landing

Suite 300

Medford, MA 02155, USA

All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.

ISBN-13: 978-1-5095-0793-1 (hardback)

ISBN-13: 978-1-5095-0794-8 (paperback)

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

Typeset in 11 on 13pt Sabon

by Fakenham Prepress Solutions, Fakenham, Norfolk NR21 8NL

Printed and bound in Great Britain by TJ International Limited

The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.

Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.

For further information on Polity, visit our website: politybooks.com

I would like to thank colleagues, friends and family near and far, including: Nerea Calvillo, Sophie Day, Michael Dieter, Sarah Doughty, Elena Esposito, Carolin Gerlitz, Christina Hughes, Eva Lash, Adam Lury, Giles Lury, Karen Lury, Henry Mainsah, Noortje Marres, Greg McInerny, Mike Michael, João Porto de Albuquerque, Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, Shirin Rai, Matt Spencer, David Stark, Martín Tironi, Nigel Thrift, Philipp Ulbrich, Matías Valderrama, Sylvia Walby, Naomi Waltham-Smith and Scott Wark. Special thanks go to Michael Castelle, who first introduced me to the idea of problem spaces; to Emma Uprichard, who kept me going; to Nate Tkacz and the three anonymous reviewers who read and commented on a draft of the book; and to Ana Gross, the co-author of Chapter 3. I would also like to thank Karina Jákupsdóttir and Jonathan Skerrett at Polity for their patience and support.

Research for this monograph was supported by an ESRC Professorial Fellowship: Order and Continuity: Methods for Change in a Topological Society, Ref No: 978-1444339598. I am grateful for this support.

Power is the compulsion of composition … The essence of power is the drive towards aesthetic worth for its own sake. All power is a derivative from this fact of composition attaining worth for itself. There is no other fact. Power and importance are aspects of this fact. It constitutes the drive of the universe. It is efficient cause, maintaining its power of survival. It is final cause, maintaining in the creature its appetition for creation.

Alfred North Whitehead (1968: 119)

Ann Kelly and Lynsey McGoey (2018) suggest that we are witnessing the emergence of ‘a new empire of truth’. Describing the significance of profound transformations in the ‘scaling, pace and symbolic power of fact-making’ for ‘the shifting relationships between knowledge, ignorance and power today’, they ask:

What constitutes authoritative evidence in this political climate? To what uses is evidence put, and what values does it carry? What obligations must be placed on the companies, such as Google or Facebook, that configure our new public spheres while profiting from the tracking and steering of online behaviour? What counts in the making of facts, and who does the counting? Which empirical tools and metrics garner sufficient political capital to guide policy during times of economic uncertainty? And, critically, how do the social sciences respond to the increasing social and political significance of data while accounting for the deepening popular scepticism of the facts that data are used to support? (2018: 2–3)

This book develops the thesis that to understand this new empire of truth and answer the questions Kelly and McGoey pose, a new concept of a problem space is needed.

In established methodological terms, a problem space is a representation of a problem in terms of relations between three components: givens, goals and operators. ‘Givens’ are the facts or information that describe the problem; ‘goals’ are the desired end state of the problem – what the knower wants to know; and ‘operators’ are the actions to be performed in reaching the desired goals. In many methodological discussions, the relation between these three components is assumed to be stable and relatively straightforward. Once givens and goals are assessed, operators – concepts and methods – can be identified and implemented, problems can be defined, analysed and solved in sequential steps: the problem space contains the problem. But such an approach presumes that we know the problem before we start investigating, and that it remains the same as it is investigated. And this is very often not the case: the problem is a problem, becomes a problem as it is investigated. If we take seriously the becoming of a problem then we cannot stick with a container conception of a problem space. Instead, we should pay attention to the constantly changing relations between givens, goals and operators in which a problem is transformed. 1This requires an understanding of a problem space as a space of methodological potential.