Reiland Rabaka - Du Bois

Along with his contributions to the origins and evolution of intersectionality, this book explores Du Bois’s contributions to interdisciplinarity – the practice of bringing the scholarship of two or more academic disciplines together to answer a research question or provide solutions to a problem. Du Bois’s collective coursework at Fisk University, Harvard University, and the University of Berlin was incredibly interdisciplinary, and resulted in a BA in classics from Fisk in 1888; a BA in philosophy from Harvard in 1890; an MA in history from Harvard in 1891; doctoral studies in history, economics, politics, and political economy at the University of Berlin between 1892 and 1894; and, ultimately, a Ph.D. in history from Harvard in 1895. 17After earning his doctorate, Du Bois began his teaching career as a professor of classics, teaching Latin, Greek, German, and English, from 1894 to 1896 at Wilberforce University, an African Methodist Episcopal institution in Ohio. He unsuccessfully attempted to add sociology to the curriculum at Wilberforce in 1894, and left the school in frustration for the University of Pennsylvania in 1896, where he was hired as an “Assistant Instructor” to research and write a study on the African Americans of Philadelphia, the previously mentioned The Philadelphia Negro . 18At the University of Pennsylvania, however, Du Bois was still not free from frustration, writing in his autobiography, “I ignored my pitiful stipend” and “it goes without saying that I did no instructing, save once to pilot a pack of idiots through the Negro slums.” 19After his brief stay at the University of Pennsylvania, Du Bois accepted a position at Atlanta University, where he established one of the first sociology departments in the United States and edited 16 innovative interdisciplinary volumes known as the “Atlanta University Studies,” which were published by Atlanta University Press consecutively between 1898 and 1914. 20

Whether we turn to Du Bois’s early reformist scholarship, his middle-period radicalism, or his late-life embrace of revolutionary politics, a certain dismissiveness pervades Du Bois studies. The general thought is that Du Bois was either a reformist or a radical or a revolutionary socialist. However, it is inconceivable that he could have occupied all three political positions throughout the course of his long life because it defies the adage of “radicalism in youth and conservatism in old age by reversing its order.” 21Du Bois’s upending of the order of conventional political development is one of the main reasons studying his life and work remains important and instructive. Another reason why studying Du Bois’s life and work continues to be crucial is because, in the long run, years of one-dimensional interpretations of his thought have led to his erasure both in the academy and in activist communities. For instance, Du Bois’s The Philadelphia Negro , although often overlooked in the history of sociology, was, upon its publication in 1899, an utterly unprecedented and undeniably innovative work in urban sociology, industrial sociology, historical sociology, political sociology, sociology of race, and sociology of culture. Elijah Anderson asserted in his introduction to a reprint edition of The Philadelphia Negro : “W. E. B. Du Bois is a founding father of American sociology, but, unfortunately, neither this masterpiece nor much of Du Bois’s other work has been given proper recognition.” In fact, Anderson continued, “it is possible to advance through a graduate program in sociology in this country without ever hearing about Du Bois.” 22

Anderson’s weighted words here help to highlight why an introduction to Du Bois’s thought that surveys its full range and reach is desperately needed. Beyond his contributions to sociology or history or politics, among other academic disciplines, Du Bois’s life and work continue to offer us much of practical value because we continue to search for solutions to many of the problems he spent a lifetime studying and critiquing. For example, Du Bois’s writings on racism in the twentieth century remain relevant in the twenty-first century because we continue to be plagued by various forms of racism, whether we turn to the police brutality that triggered the Black Lives Matter Movement or the issues surrounding immigration in the US or Europe (e.g., Italy, Portugal, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic). His contributions to the critique of patriarchy prefigure the current discourse on “male feminism” and offer a powerful model to contemporary men seeking feminist-inspired forms of masculinity. His analysis of colonialism and its interconnectedness with racism (i.e., racial colonialism) continues to have great import for adequately understanding the ongoing struggles of formerly colonized continents such as Africa, Asia, and the Americas (i.e., North, Central, and South America). Lastly, Du Bois’s often overlooked late-life work, especially Black Reconstruction , provides us with quintessential critiques of capitalism and global imperialism, and highlights the continuing overlap between racism, capitalism, and colonialism.

Du Bois: A Critical Introduction will probe the contradictions in Du Bois’s thought that were integral to his evolution from reformist social scientist to radical intellectual-activist to revolutionary democratic socialist. As will be seen, Du Bois began his intellectual and political life committed to racial and economic reform, often displaying the influence of the bourgeois academics, social democrats, race liberals, and moderate Pan-Africanists he studied with and idolized at the time. During his reformist phase, he was committed to using egalitarian and legislative methods to achieve democratic social transformation. Throughout this period, Du Bois saw little or no revolutionary potential in the working class, especially the black working class. As a result, his early thought lacked a thorough understanding of, or commitment to, working-class folk as agents of their own emancipation. Dedicated to his “Talented Tenth” leadership strategy, Du Bois’s early elitism led him to search for top-down solutions to social and political problems. His elitism gradually gave way to vanguardism – the belief that a small group of the most class-conscious, intellectually advanced, and politically sophisticated should lead the working class in their struggle against racism, colonialism, and capitalism. In the long run, this vanguardism caused him to misread many political situations, such as backing Joseph Stalin and Mao Tse-tung.

Over time, Du Bois shifted his political position from social reform to social revolution, and desperately searched for bottom-up solutions to social and political problems. In this regard, his intellectual and political evolution holds many lessons we could learn from and use today in our efforts to make sense of our epoch: from the contentious centrality of race, gender, and class in US politics, to popular revolutions across the Global South (i.e., formerly colonized or “Third World” countries), to recent worker uprisings in the US, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Du Bois began his career a dedicated elitist but, after many missteps, evolved into a committed radical democratic socialist by his later years. He came to understand the carnage of world wars, race riots, lynchings, racial segregation, the disenfranchisement of women, colonialism, and imperialism as serious indictments of the triumphalist narratives of spreading democracy that Europe and the United States have propagated for centuries. It was Du Bois’s search for solutions to the problems of racism, sexism, colonialism, and capitalism that forced him to gradually move beyond reformism and embrace radicalism, and eventually revolution. Ultimately, Du Bois’s legacy is his incredible evolution from bourgeois social scientist to revolutionary internationalist. His legacy is also bound up in what his trajectory teaches us about oppressed peoples’ awesome ability to transcend and try new things when deeply committed to transforming themselves and the world.