Genetic Disorders and the Fetus

598 598. Chang HC, Jones OW. Amniocentesis: cell culture of human amniotic fluid in a hormone supplement. In: Sirbasku DA, Pardee AB, Sato GH, eds. Growth of cells in hormonally defined media (Cold Spring Harbor Conferences on Cell Proliferation). Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1982:1187.

599 599. Medina‐Gomez P, Bard JB. Analysis of normal and abnormal amniotic fluid cells in vitro by cinemicrography. Prenat Diagn 1983; 3:311.

600 600. Harris A. Glycoproteins that distinguish different cell types found in amniotic fluid. Hum Genet 1982; 62:188.

601 601. Felix JS, Sun TT, Littlefield JW. Human epithelial cells cultured from urine: growth properties and keratin staining. In Vitro 1980; 16:866.

602 602. von Koskull H, Aula P, Trejdosiewicz LK, et al. Identification of cells from fetal bladder epithelium in human amniotic fluid. Hum Genet 1984; 65:262.

603 603. Richkind KE, Risch NJ. Sensitivity of chromosomal mosaicism detection by different tissue culture methods. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10:519.

604 604. Hoehn HW. Fluid cell culture. In: Milunsky A, ed. Genetic disorders and the fetus, 4th edn. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998: 128.

605 605. Kennerknecht I, Baur‐Aubele S, Grab D, et al. First trimester amniocentesis between the seventh and 13th weeks: evaluation of the earliest possible genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12:595.

606 606. Casey ML, Word RA, MacDonald PC. Endothelin‐1 gene expression and regulation of endothelin mRNA and protein biosynthesis in avascular human amnion. Potential source of amniotic fluid endothelin. J Biol Chem 1991; 266:5762.

607 607. Chang HC, Jones OW. Reduction of sera requirements in amniotic fluid cell culture. Prenat Diagn 1985; 5:305.

608 608. Liu L, Brinkman A, Blat C, et al. IGFBP‐1, an insulin like growth factor binding protein, is a cell growth inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1991; 174:673.

609 609. Priest JH, Rao KW. Prenatal chromosome diagnosis. In: Barch MJ, ed. The AGT cytogenetics laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1997:199.

610 610. Schmid W. A technique for in situ karyotyping of primary amniotic fluid cell cultures. Humangenetik 1975; 30:325.

611 611. Hoehn H, Rodriguez ML, Norwood TH, et al. Mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures: classification and significance. Am J Med Genet 1978; 2:253.

612 612. Boué J, Nicolas H, Barichard F, et al. Le clonage des cellules du liquide amniotique, aide dans l'interpretation des mosaiques chromosomiques en diagnostic prenatal. Ann Genet 1979; 22:3.

613 613. Hecht F, Peakman DC, Kaiser‐McCaw B, et al. Amniocyte clones for prenatal cytogenetics. Am J Med Genet 1981; 10:51.

614 614. Tabor A, Lind AM, Andersen AM, et al. A culture vessel for amniotic fluid cells allowing faster preparation of chromosome slides. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4:451.

615 615. Benn PA, Hsu LY. Maternal cell contamination of amniotic fluid cell cultures: results of a U.S. nationwide survey. Am J Med Genet 1983; 15:297.

616 616. Bui TH, Iselius L, Lindsten J. European collaborative study on prenatal diagnosis: mosaicism, pseudomosaicism and single abnormal cells in amniotic fluid cell cultures. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4 Spec No:145.

617 617. Worton RG, Stern R. A Canadian collaborative study of mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell cultures. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4 Spec No:131.

618 618. Batanian JR, Ledbetter DH, Fenwick RG. A simple VNTR‐PCR method for detecting maternal cell contamination in prenatal diagnosis. Genet Test 1998; 2:347.

619 619. Frederickson RM, Wang HS, Surh LC. Some caveats in PCR‐based prenatal diagnosis on direct amniotic fluid versus cultured amniocytes. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19:113.

620 620. Smith GW, Graham CA, Nevin J, et al. Detection of maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid cell cultures using fluorescent labelled microsatellites. J Med Genet 1995; 32:61.

621 621. Claussen U, Schafer H, Trampisch HJ. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet 1984; 67:23.

622 622. Sikkema‐Raddatz B, Castedo S, TeMeerman GJ. Probability tables for exclusion of mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17:115.

623 623. American College of Medical Genetics. Standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories, 2nd edn. Bethesda, MD: American College of Medical Genetics, 1999.

624 624. American College of Medical Genetics. Standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories, 2008. https://www.acmg.net/ACMG/Medical-Genetics-Practice-Resources/Technical_Standards_and_Guidelines.aspx (accessed July 8, 2020).

625 625. Spurbeck JL, Zinsmeister AR, Meyer KJ, et al. Dynamics of chromosome spreading. Am J Med Genet 1996; 61:387.

626 626. Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Lowe Wright L, et al. Improvements in cytogenetic slide preparation: controlled chromosome spreading, chemical aging and gradual denaturing. Cytometry 2001; 43:101.

627 627. Spurbeck JL. The dynamics of chromosome spreading. Compact disk copyright 2013. Distributed by Association of Genetic Technologists (AGT), 2014.

628 628. Cheung SW, Spitznagel E, Featherstone T, et al. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic fluid cultures: efficacy of in situ versus flask techniques. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10:41.

629 629. Featherstone T, Cheung SW, Spitznagel E, et al. Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism in amniotic fluid cultures: determination of number of colonies needed for accurate analysis. Prenat Diagn 1994; 14:1009.

630 630. Cheng EY, Luthy DA, Dunne DF, et al. Is the 15‐in situ clone protocol necessary to detect amniotic fluid mosaicism? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173:1025.

631 631. Ing PS, van Dyke DL, Caudill SP, et al. Detection of mosaicism in amniotic fluid cultures: a CYTO2000 collaborative study. Genet Med 1999; 1:94.

632 632. American College of Medical Genetics. Standards and guidelines for clinical genetics laboratories. E4.1.3 amniotic fluid. Bethesda, MD: American College of Medical Genetics, 2006.

633 633. Miron PM. Preparation, culture, and analysis of amniotic fluid samples. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2012: 8.4.

634 634. van Dyke DL, Roberson JR,Wiktor A. Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis. In: McClatchey KD, ed. Clinical laboratory medicine, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002:636.

635 635. Spurbeck JL, Carlson RO, Allen JE, et al. Culturing and robotic harvesting of bone marrow, lymph nodes, peripheral blood, fibroblasts, and solid tumors with in situ techniques. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1988; 32:59.

636 636. Carlan SJ, Papenhausen P, O'Brien WF, et al. Effect of maternal–fetal movement on concentration of cells obtained at genetic amniocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:490.

637 637. Fischer RL, LaMotta J, McMorrow LE, et al. Effect of pre‐amniocentesis uterine manipulation on amniocyte concentration and culture duration: a randomized, clinical trial. Prenat Diagn 1996; 16:673.

638 638. Melnyk JH, Persinger G, Teplitz RLA. A micromethod for processing amniotic fluid cells. In Vitro 1979; 15:200.

639 639. Byrne DL, Marks K, Braude PR, et al. Amniofiltration in the first trimester: feasibility, technical aspects and cytological outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991; 1:320.

640 640. Sundberg K, Smidt‐Jensen S, Lundsteen C, et al. Filtration and recirculation of early amniotic fluid. Evaluation of cell cultures from 100 diagnostic cases. Prenat Diagn 1993; 13:1101.

641 641. Sundberg K, Bang J, Brocks V, et al. Early sonographically guided amniocenteses with filtration technique: follow‐up on 249 procedures. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14:585.

642 642. Sundberg K, Lundsteen C, Philip J. Early filtration amniocentesis for further investigation of mosaicism diagnosed by chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn 1996; 16:1121.