Pathology of Genetically Engineered and Other Mutant Mice

29 29 Naf, D., Krupke, D.M., Sundberg, J.P. et al. (2002). The Mouse Tumor Biology Database: a public resource for cancer genetics and pathology of the mouse. Cancer Res. 62 (5): 1235–1240.

30 30 Mikaelian, I., Nanney, L.B., Parman, K.S. et al. (2004). Antibodies that label paraffin‐embedded mouse tissues: a collaborative endeavor. Toxicol. Pathol. 32 (2): 181–191.

31 31 Morse, H.C. 3rd, Anver, M.R., Fredrickson, T.N. et al. (2002). Bethesda proposals for classification of lymphoid neoplasms in mice. Blood 100 (1): 246–258.

32 32 Kogan, S.C., Ward, J.M., Anver, M.R. et al. (2002). Bethesda proposals for classification of nonlymphoid hematopoietic neoplasms in mice. Blood 100 (1): 238–245.

33 33 Sundberg, J.P., Berndt, A., Sundberg, B.A. et al. (2011). The mouse as a model for understanding chronic diseases of aging: the histopathologic basis of aging in inbred mice. Pathobiol. Aging Age Relat. Dis. 1: 7179.

34 34 Berndt, A., Cario, C.L., Silva, K.A. et al. (2011). Identification of Fat4 and Tsc22d1 as novel candidate genes for spontaneous pulmonary adenomas. Cancer Res. 71 (17): 5779–5791.

35 35 NCBI Resource Coordinators (2016). Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (D1): D7–D19.

36 36 NCBI Resource Coordinators (2015). Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 (Database issue): D6–D17.

37 37 Blake, J.A., Eppig, J.T., Kadin, J.A. et al. (2017). Mouse Genome Database (MGD)‐2017: community knowledge resource for the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 45 (D1): D723–D729.

38 38 Keane, T.M., Goodstadt, L., Danecek, P. et al. (2011). Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477 (7364): 289–294.

39 39 Yalcin, B., Wong, K., Agam, A. et al. (2011). Sequence‐based characterization of structural variation in the mouse genome. Nature 477 (7364): 326–329.

40 40 Klement, J.F., Matsuzaki, Y., Jiang, Q.J. et al. (2005). Targeted ablation of the Abcc6 gene results in ectopic mineralization of connective tissues. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (18): 8299–8310.

41 41 Berndt, A., Li, Q., Potter, C.S. et al. (2013). A single‐nucleotide polymorphism in the Abcc6 gene associates with connective tissue mineralization in mice similar to targeted models for pseudoxanthoma elasticum. J. Invest. Dermatol. 133 (3): 833–836.

42 42 Li, Q., Guo, H., Chou, D.W. et al. (2014). Mouse models for pseudoxanthoma elasticum: genetic and dietary modulation of the ectopic mineralization phenotypes. PLoS One 9 (2): e89268.

43 43 Li, Q., Philip, V.M., Stearns, T.M. et al. (2019). Quantitative trait locus and integrative genomics revealed candidate modifier genes for ectopic mineralization in mouse models of pseudoxanthoma elasticum. J. Invest. Dermatol. 139 (12): 2447–2457.e7.

44 44 Dolney, D.E., Szalai, G., and Felder, M.R. (2001). Differences in charge and kinetic properties of alcohol dehydrogenase 4 from C57BL/6 mice compared to other inbred strains are associated with a cysteine120 to arginine120 substitution. Biochem. Genet. 39 (7–8): 239–250.

45 45 Sundberg, J.P., Taylor, D., Lorch, G. et al. (2011). Primary follicular dystrophy with scarring dermatitis in C57BL/6 mouse substrains resembles central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia in humans. Vet. Pathol. 48 (2): 513–524.

46 46 Brommage, R., Powell, D.R., and Vogel, P. (2019). Predicting human disease mutations and identifying drug targets from mouse gene knockout phenotyping campaigns. Dis. Mod. Mech. 12 (5): dmm038224.

47 47 Meehan, T.F., Conte, N., West, D.B. et al. (2017). Disease model discovery from 3,328 gene knockouts by The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. Nat. Genet. 49 (8): 1231–1238.

48 48 Low, B.E., Krebs, M.P., Joung, J.K. et al. (2014). Correction of the Crb1rd8 allele and retinal phenotype in C57BL/6N mice via TALEN‐mediated homology‐directed repair. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55 (1): 387–395.

49 49 Elmore, S.A., Cardiff, R., Cesta, M.F. et al. (2018). A review of current standards and the evolution of histopathology nomenclature for laboratory animals. ILAR J. 59 (1): 29–39.

50 50 Dickinson, M.E., Flenniken, A.M., Ji, X. et al. (2016). High‐throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature 537 (7621): 508–514.

51 51 Moore, B.A., Leonard, B.C., Sebbag, L. et al. (2018). Identification of genes required for eye development by high‐throughput screening of mouse knockouts. Commun. Biol. 1: 236.

52 52 Rozman, J., Rathkolb, B., Oestereicher, M.A. et al. (2018). Identification of genetic elements in metabolism by high‐throughput mouse phenotyping. Nat. Commun. 9 (1): 288.

53 53 Sundberg, J.P., Dadras, S.S., Silva, K.A. et al. (2017). Systematic screening for skin, hair, and nail abnormalities in a large‐scale knockout mouse program. PLoS One 12 (7): e0180682.

54 54 Wang, T., Bu, C.H., Hildebrand, S. et al. (2018). Probability of phenotypically detectable protein damage by ENU‐induced mutations in the Mutagenetix database. Nat. Commun. 9 (1): 441.

55 55 Wang, T., Zhan, X., Bu, C.H. et al. (2015). Real‐time resolution of point mutations that cause phenovariance in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 (5): E440–E449.

56 56 Bogue, M.A., Philip, V.M., Walton, D.O. et al. (2020). Mouse Phenome Database: a data repository and analysis suite for curated primary mouse phenotype data. Nucleic Acids Res. 48 (D1): D716–D723.

57 57 Schofield, P.N., Bard, J.B., Boniver, J. et al. (2004). Pathbase: a new reference resource and database for laboratory mouse pathology. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 112 (4): 525–528.

58 58 Schofield, P.N., Gruenberger, M., and Sundberg, J.P. (2010). Pathbase and the MPATH ontology. Community resources for mouse histopathology. Vet. Pathol. 47 (6): 1016–1020.

59 59 Hayamizu, T.F., Mangan, M., Corradi, J.P. et al. (2005). The Adult Mouse Anatomical Dictionary: a tool for annotating and integrating data. Genome Biol. 6 (3): R29.

60 60 Schofield, P.N., Sundberg, J.P., Sundberg, B.A. et al. (2013). The mouse pathology ontology, MPATH; structure and applications. J. Biomed. Semantics 4 (1): 18.

61 61 Fisher, H.M., Hoehndorf, R., Bazelato, B.S. et al. (2016). DermO; an ontology for the description of dermatologic disease. J. Biomed. Semantics 7: 38.

62 62 Sundberg, B.A., Schofield, P.N., Gruenberger, M., and Sundberg, J.P. (2009). A data‐capture tool for mouse pathology phenotyping. Vet. Pathol. 46 (6): 1230–1240.

63 63 Sundberg, J.P., Sundberg, B.A., and Schofield, P. (2008). Integrating mouse anatomy and pathology ontologies into a phenotyping database: tools for data capture and training. Mamm. Genome 19 (6): 413–419.

64 64 Keenan, C.M., Baker, J.F., Bradley, A.E. et al. (2015). International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria (INHAND) progress to date and future plans. Toxicol. Pathol. 28 (1): 51–53.

65 65 Keenan, C.M., Baker, J., Bradley, A. et al. (2015). International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria (INHAND): progress to date and future plans. Toxicol. Pathol. 43 (5): 730–732.

66 66 Maronpot, R.R., Boorman, G.A., and Gaul, B.W. (1999). Pathology of the Mouse. Vienna, IL: Cache River Press.

67 67 Suttie, A.W., Leininger, J.R., and Bradley, A.E. (2017). Boorman's Pathology of the Rat, 2e. San Diego: Academic Press.

68 68 Rowe, D.W., Adams, D.J., Hong, S.H. et al. (2018). Screening gene knockout mice for variation in bone mass: analysis by μCT and histomorphometry. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 16 (2): 77–94.

69 69 DiTommaso, T., Jones, L.K., Cottle, D.L. et al. (2014). Identification of genes important for cutaneous function revealed by a large scale reverse genetic screen in the mouse. PLoS Genet. 10 (10): e1004705.