Advanced Healthcare Systems

37. Devlin, A.S., Wayfinding in healthcare facilities: contributions from environmental psychology. Behav. Sci. (Basel, Switzerland) , 4, 4, 423–436, Oct. 2014.

38. Bridgera, Personal Emergency Response System (PERS) Bridgera Rescue-Personal Security Anywhere-You-Go, Bridgera, 2020.

39. Hyer, K. and Rudick, L., The Effectiveness of Personal Emergency Response Systems in Meeting the Safety Monitoring Needs of Home Care Clients. JONA J. Nurs. Adm ., 24, 6, pp. 39–44, 1994, [Online]. Available: https://journals.lww.com/jonajournal/Fulltext/1994/06000/The_Effectiveness_of_Personal_Emergency_Response.10.aspx.

40. Mann, W.C., Belchior, P., Tomita, M.R., Kemp, B.J., Use of Personal Emergency Response Systems by Older Individuals With Disabilities. Assist. Technol ., 17, 1, 82–88, Mar. 2005.

41. McKenna, A.C., Kloseck, M., Crilly, R., Polgar, J., Purchasing and Using Personal Emergency Response Systems (PERS): How decisions are made by community-dwelling seniors in Canada. BMC Geriatr ., 15, 1, 1–9, 2015.

42. Heinbüchner, B., Hautzinger, M., Becker, C., Pfeiffer, K., Satisfaction and use of personal emergency response systems. Z. Gerontol. Geriatr ., 43, 4, 219–223, 2010.

43. Hamill, M., Young, V., Boger, J., Mihailidis, A., Development of an automated speech recognition interface for personal emergency response systems. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil ., 6, 1, 1–11, 2009.

44. Mackrill, J., Marshall, P., Payne, S.R., Dimitrokali, E., Cain, R., Using a bespoke situated digital kiosk to encourage user participation in healthcare environment design. Appl. Ergon ., 59, 342–356, 2017.

45. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Williams, P., Three years of digital consumer health information: a longitudinal study of the touch screen health kiosk. Inf. Process. Manage ., 39, 3, 479–502, 2003.

46. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Williams, P., Chahal, P., Determinants of Health Kiosk Use and Usefulness: Case Study of a Kiosk Which Serves a Multi-Cultural Population. Libri , 51, 2, 102–113, 2001.

47. Koch, S., Home telehealth—Current state and future trends. Int. J. Med. Inform ., 75, 8, 565–576, 2006.

48. Finkelstein, S.M., Speedie, S.M., Potthoff, S., Home Telehealth Improves Clinical Outcomes at Lower Cost for Home Healthcare. Telemed. e-Health , 12, 2, 128–136, Apr. 2006.

49. Ashwood, J.S., Mehrotra, A., Cowling, D., Uscher-Pines, L., Direct-To-Consumer Telehealth May Increase Access To Care But Does Not Decrease Spending. Health Aff ., 36, 3, 485–491, Mar. 2017.

50. Cady, R., Kelly, A., Finkelstein, S., Home telehealth for children with special healthcare needs. J. Telemed. Telecare , 14, 4, 173–177, Jun. 2008.

51. Angrish, S. et al ., How effective is the virtual primary healthcare centers? An experience from rural India. J. Family Med. Prim. Care , 9, 2, 465–469, Feb. 2020.

52. Hennick, C., How Remote Patient Monitoring Programs Are Beneficial, HealthTech, 2020, https://healthtechmagazine.net/article/2020/04/how-remote-patient-monitoring-programs-are-beneficial(accessed Aug. 25, 2020).

53. Nakamura, N., Koga, T., Iseki, H., A meta-analysis of remote patient monitoring for chronic heart failure patients. J. Telemed. Telecare , 20, 1, 11–17, Dec. 2013.

54. Pollonini, L., Rajan, N.O., Xu, S., Madala, S., Dacso, C.C., A Novel Handheld Device for Use in Remote Patient Monitoring of Heart Failure Patients— Design and Preliminary Validation on Healthy Subjects. J. Med. Syst ., 36, 2, 653–659, 2012.

55. Sanabria, M. et al ., Remote Patient Monitoring Program in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Impact on Hospitalizations. Perit. Dial. Int ., 39, 5, 472–478, Sep. 2019.

56. Pekmezaris, R. et al ., The Impact of Remote Patient Monitoring (Telehealth) upon Medicare Beneficiaries with Heart Failure. Telemed. e-Health , 18, 2, 101–108, Jan. 2012.

57. Klersy, C. et al ., Economic impact of remote patient monitoring: An integrated economic model derived from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail ., 13, 4, 450–459, 2011.

58. Fleming, D.A., Edison, K.E., Pak, H., Telehealth Ethics. Telemed. e-Health , 15, 8, 797–803, Sep. 2009.

59. Ajaz, K., The Importance of Equipment Efficiency for the Healthcare Sector, Electronic Health Reporter, 2018, https://electronichealthreporter.com/the-importance-of-equipment-efficiency-for-the-healthcare-sector/(accessed Aug. 25, 2020).

60. Matityaho, S., LogiTag System, The IoT Streamlines Healthcare Supply Chains, 2015, https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/1fd06f20/files/uploaded/IoTInHealthcare_FINAL.pdf.

61. Man, L.C.K., Na, C.M., Kit, N.C., IoT-Based Asset Management System for Healthcare-Related Industries. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manage ., 7, 19, Jan. 2015.

62. Shiklo, B., RFID and IoT: A smart symbiosis for hospital asset tracking and management, ScienceSoft, 2018, https://www.scnsoft.com/blog/smart-hospital-asset-tracking.

63. BEHRTECH, 3 Great Benefits of IoT for Healthcare Asset Management, BehrTech Blog, 2020, https://behrtech.com/blog/iot-for-healthcare-asset-management/(accessed Aug. 25, 2020).

64. Hanne, T., Melo, T., Nickel, S., Bringing Robustness to Patient Flow Management Through Optimized Patient Transports in Hospitals. INFORMS J. Appl. Anal ., 39, 3, 241–255, Mar. 2009.

65. DAIC, FDA Grants Emergency Use Authorization to Vital Connect for Cardiac Monitoring in COVID-19 Patients, Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology, 2020, https://www.dicardiology.com/content/fda-grants-emergency-use-authorization-vitalconnect-cardiac-monitoring-covid-19-patients(accessed Aug. 25, 2020).

66. Science Daily, Clinical-grade wearables offer continuous monitoring for COVID-19, ScienceDaily, 2020, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200701125410.htm(accessed Aug. 25, 2020).

67. Darwish, A. and Hassanien, A.E., Wearable and implantable wireless sensor network solutions for healthcare monitoring. Sensors , 11, 6, 5561–5595, 2011.

68. Zoll, Zoll Life Vest, Zoll Cardiac Diagnostics, 2020, https://lifevest.zoll.com/medical-professionals.

69. Spiegelman, J., Krenitsky, N., Syeda, S., Sutton, D., Moroz, L., Case Study Rapid Development and Implementation of a Covid-19 Telehealth Clinic for Obstetric Patients, NEJM Catal, no. May 15, 2020.

70. Aziz, A. et al ., Telehealth for High-Risk Pregnancies in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am. J. Perinatol ., 37, 8, 800–808, Jun. 2020.

1 *Corresponding author: uniqueruchi@rediffmail.com

Hritu Raj, Mohit Kumar, Prashant Kumar*, Amritpal Singh and Om Prakash Verma

Dr. BR Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar (Punjab), India

Abstract

In today’s era, the IoT (Internet of Things) introduced a new way to create a bond between devices and humans for enhancing and making life quite easy. The main purpose of attraction toward improving the healthcare industry with the latest technology is because IoT has proven great opportunity in smart offices, warehouses, smart homes, etc. So, IoT can also improve the healthcare industry very well. The healthcare sensor generates health-related data like blood pressure, blood glucose, blood temperature, ECG, and much more. These devices produce very large amounts of data, which need to be processed, filtered, and stored securely and efficiently. In this paper, we will discuss the complete architecture with various challenges and security risks of the next-generation healthcare industry with healthcare IoT sensor and fog computing. This paper also consists of some methodology used in various research papers to address the security and privacy related in IoT, fog, and cloud computing environment.