Аlmaz Braev - A statesman who doesn’t exist yet. Remid

It’s all about what the next quality will be central. If under feudalism it is the gentility and subordination of the nobility by blood, under socialism the ability to remember and adopt words and slogans from revolutionaries then under capitalism, when in general the traditional people do not know the meaning of money all Zerefs will start speculating. Yes, so that they will overtake their teachers in rigidity and cynicism. Authoritative capitalists will be surprised, and revolutionaries will turn over in their coffins. Why do these people have so much rigidity towards their own, namely their own people? And when we’re traditional, crypto-traditional, and post-traditional people sensitive to each other? In the family group, the relatives will see everything and not allow it: they will punish for callousness, non-participation, and disrespect. That is, there are witnesses nearby. The traditional person was always visible in front of the community. Under feudalism, Zeref must observe the norms of community morality. Under socialism, morality tripled by slogans generally put more pressure on Zeref than the pressure of relatives. Under capitalism, this triple pressure has disappeared. Triple! It immediately cut off —it means that is time to build a new hierarchy. And who of the same people will move just like that? Why give way to others? Will he want to stand at the bottom and train his eyes on the forehead? From above, there is always pressure and violence, scolding – in fact, everything is the same traditional, without the sentimentality of civilization. From below, execution and sensitivity with eyes on the forehead. Hence, the cruelty of banks and large percentages of bankers – these instances or other forms that are traditional substances in themselves. Who is sitting in banks? – Zerefs. That is, their own people. And we know that Zerefs needs to rise quickly, if not already risen, that is the same traditional people. And traditional people always just push. On their kind, the same people, but unfortunately lower status. If in the natural era there were all sorts of heroes, warriors, now in the realm of money, these heroes and warriors are the cruelest, heartless speculators. They don’t see relatives and don’t look for any kinship. They just push and belittle. Discipline is the name of discipline. This is the law of survival. So, it was, and so it remains.

Where it go?

All the people are scattered in the cities. But what kind of people are they? What do they profess? What values are recognized? How quickly and clearly do they imitate other people's forms but immediately remain themselves?

Let’s look at the ranks of officials and see that the ranks of the chosen were not recruited for professionalism. We will definitely indicate that this is a traditional group of pseudo – warriors. They are not well adapted for real combat conflicts, so they have a very strange appearance, but for privatization, for example, this type and, most importantly, the quality of candidates will be optimal. We never forget that the core of the tradition is already at the very center, and circles are strung on it one after another, one on top of the other. The right people in the system are only required to remain silent and run errands, just like in war. On the other hand, each chief executive will choose the same silent relative – the same necessary anachronism of tradition, at the very end, it is just as suitable as at the very top, only at the top while the form is observed and at the bottom immediately there is no form. At the bottom everything is simple: if you can’t cope, if you don’t arrange it, go for a walk. Thus, the entire market system is created on the traditional (military, paramilitary, crypto-military) basis, and there is no place for others, alien, dangerous, and incomprehensible in this system. Although this is no longer a system of primitive warriors, it is already a system, a socio-economic formation even such a state consists only of a form. The institutions of the state seem to exist, but the content is old, feudal.

How was it overcome a little so that each chief executive did not choose his shadow?

Under socialism, there was, of course, rotation, so that one officer did not create a circle of "friends". In fact, under capitalism, this problem of acquaintances is solved by the same change of leaders, only having time to mix them. But all of them were selected for privatization and distribution of benefits. That is, they are not relatives, people are not really relatives, they are a kind of relatives, they are almost a medieval order. And do not forget for a minute about the central spine. A stranger, a man from the street, is not allowed in such an order. Yes, to such an extent that they immediately have time to agree. But in general, the hierarchy has already been established. It lived here. But in culture. And people of a select circle are extremely reluctant to choose their assistants from nowhere, unverified, but still, there are elevators.

What kind of abilities do you need to have to please the new elite?

It seems that the capitalists always talks about a new round of mimicry – about democracy. But there is still the same traditional something, where there is no criticism discipline, and few people can say bad things about power. After all, if they start talking about it, about democracy, about rights, these next ambitious people, the faster the whole system with the center and circles will fall apart. But why would it fall apart? To gather again on the same prohibitions and respect for the elders (by position). There is no doubt that such a system will come together again. And the more people talk about their commitment to the old, to the precepts of their ancestors, and similar folklore, the sooner this old structure will gather, despite the new fashion, however. After all, traditional people, although they look like adherents of the old and talk about precepts in fact, at the same time are the most ridiculous but zealous imitators of world fashion. Because to create a primitive hierarchy (by blood), you need to go through all the circles of rebirth back with the search for these same people of famous blood. It always sounds beautiful in words. In fact, the people of the past ruined nobles went through many battles to subdue the same freedom-loving Zerefs of the past. And under capitalism, the set also occurred, and many received the joy of large, no matter how received the money. After all, the goal is everything, and the means are nothing. This law sounds invisible sounds, creating new circles around the central spine (the core of hierarchy). Whatever you build, I will, “this rod says. Whatever you talk about at feasts, corporate parties, hangouts, or just because of swagger and bragging, about the great past or bright present, next to you the same I – your core, your culture.

P.S.

By the way, modern geopolitics is based on this dual hypocrisy and fanaticism at the same time. The Western world supports the democracy of archaic peoples. Archaic peoples will inevitably create an old primitive society, not a democracy, because they will always rely on covenants when any dispute arises. And they will return to the old road of the ancestors, with a full turn back, they will destroy all the buildings of civilization.

Everyone knows that in traditional society, there are eternal difficulties with rotation. Everyone knows, but they can't do anything. They can't do it, and they want to avoid doing anything. This is such a phenomenon, the consciousness awakened by someone from the outside wakes up, can be a writer, analyst, journalist, and the traditional person still sleeps and sleeps. Or they are pretending to. Usually, rotation is understood as the supreme power or tip. In modern political terms, a leader or a political leader does not want to leave. He does not want to leave and even says that he does not see his replacement. This scene is bound to happen. There is no one to put. Who will put after? In general, there is no replacement, anyway. Everyone is waiting, as in the story of Khoja Nasreddin about his Emir and the talking donkey, who will be the first to die.