Vadim Birstein - The Perversion of Knowledge

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Vadim Birstein - The Perversion of Knowledge» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Город: Cambridge, MA, Год выпуска: 2004, ISBN: 2004, Издательство: Westview Press, Жанр: История, Публицистика, dissident, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

The Perversion of Knowledge: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «The Perversion of Knowledge»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

During the Soviet years, Russian science was touted as one of the greatest successes of the regime. Russian science was considered to be equal, if not superior, to that of the wealthy western nations.
, a history of Soviet science that focuses on its control by the KGB and the Communist Party, reveals the dark side of this glittering achievement.
Based on the author’s firsthand experience as a Soviet scientist, and drawing on extensive Russian language sources not easily available to the Western reader, the book includes shocking new information on biomedical experimentation on humans as well as an examination of the pernicious effects of Trofim Lysenko’s pseudo-biology. Also included are many poignant case histories of those who collaborated and those who managed to resist, focusing on the moral choices and consequences. The text is accompanied by the author’s own translations of key archival materials, making this work an essential resource for all those with a serious interest in Russian history.
[Contain tables.]

The Perversion of Knowledge — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «The Perversion of Knowledge», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Sudoplatov wrote that the plan to murder Tito was prepared by MGB deputy minister Yevgenii Pitovranov. 358At first Sudoplatov discussed the plan with Stalin, Beria, and Ignatiev (the new MGB minister, see Chapter 3). It was then discussed with the MVD deputy minister Ivan Serov, with the head of the MGB First (Foreign) Directorate, Sergei Savchenko, and with the MGB deputy ministers Vassilii Ryasnoi, General Yepishev, Pitovranov, and Minister Ignatiev. On March 1, 1953, the MGB reported to Stalin that “Max’s” attempt to assassinate Tito had, unfortunately, not taken place yet. 359Possibly, this report was the last document Stalin read before he suffered the fatal stroke in the early hours of March 2.

According to Vitalii Pavlov, a former head of the KGB Foreign Intelligence Institute, Grigulevich refused to fulfill this assignment. 360He was called back to Moscow and was discharged from the MGB. He was afraid of being killed: He knew too much. Possibly, only Stalin’s death and the arrest of Beria saved his life.

3 COLLABORATORS

The diaries, letters, and publications of Nazi doctors of the time… contain few elements of idealism… Dominating these documents, instead, are small-minded greed for money and privileges, careerism, and a mixture of envy, inflated self-esteem, and contempt for the so-called inferior.

—C. Pross, introduction to G. Aly, P. Chroust, and C. Pross, Cleansing the Fatherland: Nazi Medicine and Hygiene

THIS CHAPTER CONCERNS THOSE scientists who accepted the Soviet regime and successfully used its opportunities to their personal advantage without any concern for morality and ethics. This group includes the Soviet secret service’s chief poison investigator, biochemist Grigory Mairanovsky, those who worked in Mairanovsky’s lab, those who wrote positive reviews of his dissertation, those who helped to organize slave labor for the Soviet economy, and those who used contacts with the secret services to enhance their professional careers. Also, I will discuss the phenomenon of academic institutions as a place for retirement of former MGB executioners.

MAIRANOVSKY’S CAREER

The Beginning and Success

Only incompetent doctors went to work at the MGB. They went to the MGB not because of ideological principles, but because the salary was much higher there than that of normal humane doctors and medical sisters. And after having been hired by the MGB system and having breathed its poisoned air, a person began to lose his or her conscience and turned into a non-human being.

—L. Shatunovskaya, Life in the Kremlin

I begin with a detailed biography of Grigory Mairanovsky. Only a few documents about Mairanovsky (in the Memorial Archive) are available; the main archival records are still secret. The existence of Mairanovsky’s laboratory in 1939–1951 became known during the investigation of Lavrentii Beria, one of the main organizers and administrators of the Soviet secret service and manager of the Soviet atomic project, who was arrested soon after Stalin’s death in 1953 and condemned to death during a secret trial. The archival materials concerning this 1953 trial are also still secret. Mairanovsky was arrested even before Beria, in 1951.

The limited materials from Memorial’s Archive 1allow me to reconstruct the scientific career of the head of Laboratory No. 1. Grigory Mairanovsky was born in 1899 in Batumi (Georgia), to a Jewish family and was later identified as a Jew in all official documents. Mairanovsky graduated from Tiflis (Tbilisi) University in 1919 and from the Moscow Second Medical Institute in 1923. In 1929, he became a researcher at the Moscow A. N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, and from 1933 to 1935 served as head of the Toxicology Department there (Document 11, Appendix II, and Table 3.1). The director of the institute, Academician Aleksei Bach, was well known for his support of the Bolshevik Party. Dr. Zbarsky, who was a consultant of the OGPU/NKVD, was deputy director of the Bach Institute. Both Bach and Zbarsky played an important role in the Sovietization of the academy (Chapter I). Possibly, Mairanovsky’s contacts with the NKVD started when he headed the Toxicology Department, since in the USSR, toxicological studies were always secret and controlled by the secret services. The connection with the NKVD also explains why Mairanovsky, who had been working at the Bach Institute as a researcher for only four years, suddenly became deputy director (Document 12, Appendix II). Apparently, he replaced Zbarsky, who in 1933 was appointed chair of the Department of Biochemistry at the Moscow First Medical Institute.

From 1935 until 1937, Mairanovsky headed a special (i.e., secret) laboratory at the All-Union Institute of Experimental Medicine (VIEM). VIEM was created in 1932 in Leningrad on the personal initiative of the Soviet writer Maxim Gorky and the Soviet leaders Stalin and Molotov. It was based on the old Institute of Experimental Medicine, which was established in 1890. In 1934, the main part of VIEM was transferred to Moscow, and only a small branch of it continued to exist in Leningrad. 2Evidently, Mairanovsky moved to VIEM after the reorganization that followed its transfer from Leningrad to Moscow. He may have been invited to create and head a new secret laboratory. After two years of heading this laboratory, Mairanovsky was demoted to senior researcher and continued to work at this position until 1940 (Document 10, Appendix II). He evidently continued to work at VIEM, but the NKVD became his main affiliation. The name of his last department at VIEM, the Pathology Department of Poisoning Substances, leaves no doubt that this laboratory worked for the NKVD and, probably, also for the military. In September 1938, Mairanovsky officially joined the NKVD (Document 13, Appendix II), where his Laboratory No. 1 started to function in 1939. Mairanovsky worked in the NKVD/MKGB/MGB system until his arrest in December 1951.

Table 3.1 Dates of Mairanovsky’s Biography
No. Event or employment Date(s)
1. Birth 1899
2. Graduation from the Tiflis [Tbilisi] University 1919
3. Graduation from the 2nd Medical Institute (Moscow) 1923
4. Post-graduate student, Bach Institute of Biochemistry 1928-29
5. Researcher, Bach Institute of Biochemistry 1929-32
6. Senior Researcher, Bach Institute of Biochemistry 1932-33
7. Head, Toxicology Department, Bach Institute of Biochemistry 1933-35
8. Deputy Director of Bach Institute 1934-35
9. Head, Special [Secret] Laboratory, All-Union Institute of Experimental Medicine [VIEM] 1935-37
10. Senior Researcher, Special [Secret] Laboratory, VIEM 1937-38
11. Senior Researcher, Pathology [Secret] Department of OV [Poisoning Substances], VIEM 1938-40
12. Head, Laboratory No. 1, NKVD/NKGB 1938-46
13. Defence of a doctorate dissertation 1940
14. Approval of the dissertation 1943
15. Approval of Professor’s title 1943
16. Assignment to Germany 1945
17. Assasinations within Sudoplatov’s squad 1946-50
18. Senior Engineer, Laboratory No. 1, OOT, MGB 1946-51
19. Arrest December 12, 1951
20. A letter to MGB Acting Minister Sergei Ogol’tsov October 17, 1951
21. A letter to MGB Minister Semyon Ignatiev December 19, 1952
22. Trial February 14, 1953
23. Imprisonment in Vladimir Prison March 5, 1953
24. A letter to MVD Minister Lavrentii Beria April 27, 1953
25. Transfer to Lubyanka Prison, Moscow June 7, 1953
26. Interrogation by Prosecutor Tsaregorodsky regarding Laboratory No. 1 August 27, 1953
27. Another interrogation September 23, 1953
28. Deprivation of a Doctor degree December 19, 1953
29. A letter to Nikita Khrushchev August 1955
30. Transfer to Lubyanka Prison, Moscow March 2, 1957
31. Participation in Eitingon’s trial March 6, 1957
32. Transfer to Lubyanka Prison, Moscow September 6, 1958
33. Participation in Sudoplatov’s trial September 12, 1958
34. The release from Vladimir Prison December 13, 1961
35. Head, Biochemical Laboratory, Makhachkala 1962-64
36. A letter to President of the Medical Academy Nikolai Blokhin May 18, 1964
37. Academician Blokhin’s answer June 4, 1964
38. Death December 1964

In July 1940, Mairanovsky defended his Doctor of Biological Sciences dissertation at a closed council of scientists at the VIEM who had been authorized to know about the secret work of the NKVD-MGB. Each Soviet and now Russian research institute has a Scientific Council consisting of heads of laboratories and prominent scientists working at the institute. Well-known-scientists usually serve on the Scientific Council of several institutes. Besides being in charge of the defense of candidate and doctoral dissertations, the Scientific Council approves the main events of scientific life at the institute—the future plans of different laboratories, reports on ongoing projects, decisions of the administration, and so forth. The scientific secretary of the institute is in charge of the organization of the meetings of the council and all paperwork. Besides the ordinary Scientific Council, whose meetings any employee of the institute can attend, many institutes have a separate special Scientific Council consisting of members who were cleared by the KGB. These special councils are in charge of secret projects of the institute and their meetings are closed to employees without special clearance.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «The Perversion of Knowledge»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «The Perversion of Knowledge» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «The Perversion of Knowledge»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «The Perversion of Knowledge» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x