Oleg Starchen - Laconic philosophical encyclopedia. LaPhiEnia (LPE)

It is a philosophy that has been influenced by cinema (for example, a remake of philosophy, a philosophical thriller, a philosophical drama, a philosophical comedy, a philosophical tragicomedy, the directing of philosophy, a philosophical director, a philosophical sequel, a philosophical prequel, a philosophical role, a philosophical cameo, etc.).

(exactly comical philosophy, do not confuse with coSmical philosophy)

Such a philosophy is impossible to read or listen to, without laughing at the same time at least sometimes. For example, humorist in philosophy was Nietzsche, and Levin.

Note. That is exactly LeVin (psychologist). In the first edition of the LPE was a misprint.

As my colleague, Aristocles Plato, said, “philosophy should not be mediocre, but brave, even shameless.” For example, Philogyneya quite adequate for such teachings of the ancient Greek philosopher. Such courage and shamelessness helps to the progress of philosophy. Note. Quote one Laconian: “I’m not afraid of anything, but that’s what I’m afraid, is that I’m not afraid of anything. But I’m not afraid of anything, so I’m not afraid of that too.”

A clock is not a time machine, but a machine that show’s time, i.e. a clock is an epistemological time machine.

The view that it is impossible to know the future, this chronoagnosticism, futuroagnosticism. Prophetic philosophy overcomes this epistemological pessimism, this epistemological stereotype of philosophy.

Orgaosophy in fact is the driving philosophy behind leading the entire philosophy of the XXI century to the XXII century, and even more to the XXVII century, because the XXI century ad (Anno Domini) according to Orgaosophy is the XXVII century ath. (Anno Thales), philosophical era, starting with Thales.

The sun shines brightly on everything, but in some places there are shadows.

Nietzsche thought Heraclitus is unique in its sense. Indeed, it is possible to divide dichotomously philosophy not on materialism and idealism, but on the “dark” philosophy (Heraclitus, etc.) and eudiosophy, i.e. clearly understanding philosophy (almost all other philosophers).

The quality that inherent in the original philosophy is its delicacy, for such a philosophy raises unusual topics and points of view of the philosophical consideration of reality, which may at first glance look as scandalous and shocking.

Natural science’s scientist who will make the final step to creation of supermind, is the demiurge of the overmind in science.

It’s the philosophy of a desperate man trying to save himself and his sister, who’s disabled.

Sri Aurobindo Ghosh joined Hegelianism and Indian philosophy and received as a result supramentalism, Europeization of which made Zeazrosophy.

Thales of Miletus and other ancient Greek philosophers carried out the Europeization of philosophy, so that philosophy did not remain the privilege of the East, India and China.

Gorilla is not so evil as chimpanzee and human. This is because the gorilla is less related to humans than the chimpanzee.

Evil is an atavism, inherited from his evolutionary ancestors, which were not yet social. Therefore, human tries to fight evil, because he lives in a society where evil is not only no longer useful, but also became harmful.

Note. See the book Categorics.

It is difficult even to imagine on such philosophy. The General theory of supramentality shows that in other Universes will be the superconsciousness abilities, adequate to these Universes.

According to the hygiene and euconfabulatorics, to clear the memory from unnecessary and harmful memories is important just as washing hands.

Diogenes Laertius in his famous book writes that Antisthenes, the founder of cynicism, believed that it was “science to forget unnecessary – the most necessary science”. In this regard, it is interesting to philosophize about such a possible philosophical science. Such a science can be called as Euconfabulatorics. Etymology of the term: “ευ” means good (according to old-gr.), “confabulation” (in lat.) means the imaginary memory. Elementary hygiene agrees with Euconfabulatorics, this the most necessary science of Antisthenes.

Let the emblem of a philosophy is the heart and spectacles. The heart symbolizes love, and the spectacles symbolize wisdom, not just a lack of vision.

Review. “On the spectacles… are you sure?”

(Gregory Fox Galaktion, 01.25.2012)

Note. α. This work was first published in 2012. Only later the author learned that the symbol of polyamory (i.e., the theory of love not to a single woman, but to many women at once and at the same time absolutely sincere love) is surprisingly similar to the proposed emblem of philosophy, namely: the emblem of polyamory – the symbol of the heart, on which is the symbol of infinity. Thus, the emblem of philosophy is the emblem of Philogyneya as polyamory.

β. Here’s what about the philosophy’s emblem was published after my publication in 2012: https://otvet.mail.ru/question/89935161

One of the possible epithets of philosophy – is a sunny philosophy.

(Do not confused with “Epictets of philosophy”, i.e., of the stoic philosophers, variously congenial claiming that happiness is subjective, and not objective, a nominal name from the ancient Roman philosopher Epictetus)

Philosophy deserves many epithets. Therefore, they are multitude in quantity and multitude in quality. For example, concise or laconic philosophy (Laphienia), categorical (Categorics), supramental (Zeazrosophy), imaginary (Orgaosophy), philogynic philosophy (Philogyneya), etc.

Óργ or Εργ by old-gr. means “work.” The meaning of Ergaosophy: this is a working philosophy, in contrast to philosophy an idle, in contrast to lazy philosophy.

Unlike Wittgenstein’s “Logical-philosophical treatise” as a ladder, Zeazrosophy – escalator of philosophy and knowing, self-propelled to the height, to reach the top of philosophy and knowledge.

Such ethics is based on the principle: “imagine the imagination of a person in relation to you, with whom you act, and act so that this person has no reason for the desire to imagine a bad act, word or deed, in relation to you.” Imagination of imagination is empathy. It’s something like of overmibd by Kordemsky, that he meant, however not using this term in the book “Mathematic savvy” in the task of the “Three wise men”, in which the sages laughed.