Mary Roach - Grunt

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Mary Roach - Grunt» весь текст электронной книги совершенно бесплатно (целиком полную версию без сокращений). В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Город: New York, Год выпуска: 2016, ISBN: 2016, Издательство: W. W. Norton, Жанр: nonf_military, sci_popular, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Grunt: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Grunt»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

Best-selling author Mary Roach explores the science of keeping human beings intact, awake, sane, uninfected, and uninfested in the bizarre and extreme circumstances of war.
Grunt
Tennessee
An Amazon Best Book of June 2016:
Amazon.com Review It takes a special kind of writer to make topics ranging from death to our gastrointestinal tract interesting (sometimes hilariously so), and pop science writer Mary Roach is always up to the task. In her latest book,
, she explores how our soldiers combat their non-gun-wielding opponents—panic, heat exhaustion, the runs, and more. It will give you a new appreciation not only for our men and women in uniform (and by the way, one of the innumerable things you’ll learn is how and why they choose the fabric for those uniforms), but for the unsung scientist-soldiers tasked with coming up with ways to keep the “grunts” alive and well. If you are at all familiar with Roach’s oeuvre, you know her enthusiasm for her subjects is palpable and infectious. This latest offering is no exception.
—Erin Kodicek,
“A mirthful, informative peek behind the curtain of military science.” (Washington Post)
“From the ever-illuminating author of
and
comes an examination of the science behind war. Even the tiniest minutiae count on the battlefield, and Roach leads us through her discoveries in her inimitable style.” (Elle)
“Mary Roach is one of the best in the business of science writing… She takes readers on a tour of the scientists who attempt to conquer the panic, exhaustion, heat, and noise that plague modern soldiers.” (Brooklyn Magazine)
“Extremely likable … and quick with a quip…. [Roach’s] skill is to draw out the good humor and honesty of both the subjects and practitioners of these white arts among the dark arts of war.” (San Francisco Chronicle)
“Nobody does weird science quite like [Roach], and this time, she takes on war. Though all her books look at the human body in extreme situations (sex! space! death!), this isn’t simply a blood-drenched affair. Instead, Roach looks at the unexpected things that take place behind the scenes.” (Wired)
“Brilliant.” (Science)
“Roach … applies her tenacious reporting and quirky point of view to efforts by scientists to conquer some of the soldier’s worst enemies.” (Seattle Times)
“Covering these topics and more, Roach has done a fascinating job of portraying unexpected, creative sides of military science.” (New York Post)
“Having investigated sex, death, and preparing for space travel,
best-selling Roach applies her thorough—and thoroughly entertaining—techniques to the sobering subject of keeping soldiers not just alive but alert and healthy of mind and body during warfare.” (Library Journal)
“A rare literary bird, a best selling science writer … Roach avidly and impishly infiltrates the world of military science…. Roach is exuberantly and imaginatively informative and irreverently funny, but she is also in awe of the accomplished and committed military people she meets.” (Booklist (starred review))

Grunt — читать онлайн бесплатно полную книгу (весь текст) целиком

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Grunt», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

The crew of the Squalus were as lucky as they were unlucky; the Navy’s first submarine rescue chamber had just been completed and tested. The Squalus was its maiden rescue. Thirty-three survivors rode it to the surface. The chamber was a modified diving bell. As with an inverted drinking glass lowered into water, the pressure of the air trapped inside keeps the water outside. A diver accompanied the bell to position its opening over the lip of one of the submarine’s hatches and bolt it in place. The sub’s hatch could now be opened, and small groups of crew helped into the chamber.

Prior to this, sinking was likely a death sentence. Even a few inches of water will bear down on a submarine hatch—or a car door, for that matter—with sufficient pressure that it can’t be pushed open (unless one equalizes the pressure by letting water in). On the smaller subs of the 1920s, the air would last about three days. It was one of these “iron coffins,” the S-51, that inspired Lieutenant Commander Charles “Swede” Momsen to come up with a way to get people out. Momsen’s sub had been the one that first arrived on the scene. All the crew could do was stare at the oil slick on the surface of the water, “utterly helpless,” as Momsen wrote to a friend. When the sub was salvaged, bodies of the crew were said to have been found with their fingers torn and bloodied from trying to pry open a hatch against fifteen tons of ocean.

Given that most US ballistic missile submarines today spend the bulk of their time in oceans that bottom out deeper than their crush depth, the term “iron coffin” has regained some accuracy. Crush depth is the point at which the hull succumbs to the extreme water pressure and the sub implodes. John Clarke likens it to putting a submarine inside a giant bomb. The sub shatters inward. And the crew? “If you can imagine,” Clarke says, “all the metal parts are imploding together and anything in the way would be crushed and shredded and pounded into bits.” No one saves your bottom now. On April 10, 1963, the USS Thresher imploded, killing all 129 men aboard. “She’s scattered all over the seafloor,” Jerry Lamb says.

In light of the deep-sea haunts of modern subs, why even bother with rescue and escape systems? Do they simply exist to, as one submariner expressed it, “give moms and dads a warm feeling”? No, no more so than airplane emergency exit slides. Because, as with airplanes, most collisions take place on arriving or departing: in port or airport, where the traffic is busiest but the plummet most survivable.

The Tang went down in water just 180 feet deep, but rescue was complicated by the circumstances of battle. She sank in the midst of the convoy of Japanese ships she’d spent the night torpedoing and sinking. In the end, bad air forced the crew’s hand. Smoke had built up from the burning of classified paperwork, and saltwater had reached the batteries, creating deadly chlorine gas. Disaster luncheon. You didn’t need a decision tree to know that Stay had turned into Go.

Swede Momsen invented something for this scenario, too. During World War II, subs were equipped with escape trunks and Momsen lungs. (The “lung” was a wearable air supply that, upon reaching the surface, handily converted to a flotation device). Like an airlock on a spaceship, the escape trunk allows for the equalization of pressure inside and outside. On a sub, this allows the hatch to be popped open and the lung-clad sailor set loose in the brine. The Tang was the first bottomed sub from which sailors escaped without the aid of a rescue bell. There were nine, four of whom subsequently drowned or disappeared. (In the surreal etiquette of war, the five survivors were plucked from the near-freezing water by their enemies—as the Tang ’s commanding officer described them, “the burned and mutilated survivors of our own handiwork”—who then beat them and sent them to starve in a prisoner of war camp.)

What happened to the rest of the men gathered in the Tang ’s torpedo room in their Momsen lungs? Why didn’t they escape? They weren’t sure how to do it. “A majority of the men,” reads the patrol report, “had never been properly trained in the use of the Momsen lungs or operation of the escape tank. They, therefore, didn’t have any self-confidence in their ability to escape, causing a general feeling of defeat among them…. After the first two attempts there were very few men left who cared to try an escape although they knew what was going to happen to them below.” They are all there in the Summary of Escapes. Torpedoman’s Mate Fluker: “Would not try after this, his second attempt.” Unnamed Ensign: “Removed in stupor from trunk; preferred not to try again.” Unnamed Machinist’s Mate: “Would not try after this, his first attempt.”

A little practice might have made the difference. “Although everyone had read how to escape,” says the report, “not one had actually went through the motions.” In 1930, at the urging of Swede Momsen, an escape training tank was commissioned for the submarine base in Groton. With the hope that every submariner would have a chance to went through the motions.

AT 40 feet deep and 84,000 gallons, the Naval Submarine School’s Pressurized Submarine Escape Trainer holds easily as much water as a hotel swimming pool. In diameter, though, it’s closer to a Jacuzzi. It’s the sort of thing you might drop into by accident, like a manhole, because you didn’t notice it was there. Despite the aquamarine water and the echoey tile walls, pool isn’t the right word. This is a column of pretend ocean that exists for a single, highly nonrecreational purpose: to practice bailing out of a stricken sub.

Twenty-six sub school students stand around the water’s perimeter in identical (Navy) blue swim trunks. They are young enough that the pimples on their backs still outnumber the tattoos. In ten years it will be different. Navy boys accrue ink like sun damage. A little more every year, in every port. The first training exercise will begin in an escape trunk that feeds into the water fifteen feet down. No breathing apparatus will be worn, just a life jacket. The instructor calls it “a buoyant exhaling ascent,” a term I will tuck away for later use should I ever be called upon to write opera reviews.

Exhaling is the word to be underscored. Faced with an ascent from deep underwater, novice swimmers are inclined to hold their breath—not just to stay alive, but to help buoy them to the surface. They may not realize that that initial lungful of air they took in will expand as they rise and the water pressure decreases. If that breath expands enough, it will burst the lung’s alveoli—the tiny sacs where an exchange of gases in the air and the blood takes place. Should this happen, air bubbles can get into the bloodstream. Air embolism. Not good. Critical care luncheon. The bubble can act like a clot, blocking blood flow and starving organs of oxygen. If the organ in question is the brain or heart, the tissue damage may be fatal. There is speculation in the Tang patrol report that this had been the fate of four men who made it out of the escape trunk but then disappeared: that they’d lost the mouthpieces of their Momsen lungs and hadn’t realized the consequences of holding their breath.

“It’s the Golden Rule of sub school,” the instructor, Eric Nabors, is saying. “Don’t hold your breath.” Nabors carries the evocative title Diving Officer, and seems built in keeping. His hair is buzzed to a half millimeter, his wedding band tattooed. Nothing disrupts the hydrodynamic flow of Eric Nabors in a wetsuit.

To modulate their exhalation—not too fast, not too slow—the young men are instructed to pretend they’re blowing out birthday candles. Yelling also works. To further discourage breath-holding, Nabors and his fellow instructors used to inflate a wine bag down at the bottom of the water and let it go. As it surfaced, the bag would burst.

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Grunt»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Grunt» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Grunt»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Grunt» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x