Steve Martini - The Arraignment

“Did you see the car, the vehicle with the shooter?” asks Ortiz.

“Just for an instant. It was going the other way, away from me. What I remember is that it was a dark sedan. I couldn’t tell you the make or model. I didn’t get that good a look.”

“And of course you didn’t see a license number?”

I shake my head.

“You probably wouldn’t,” he says. “We don’t think it had any plates. They were removed by whoever stole it, before the shooting. We found the vehicle late last night abandoned on the other side of town. I’m sure you’ll read about it in tomorrow’s paper,” he says.

“Did you get any fingerprints?” says Harry.

“That you won’t read about,” says Padgett.

“How well did you know Mr. Rush?” says Ortiz.

“We did business from time to time. Referred clients. That sort of thing.”

“Were you close socially?”

“We would get together for lunch once in a while. See each other at bar meetings.”

“We’ve been told that you talked with him the morning he was killed.”

“We had a brief conversation.”

Padgett takes out his notepad.

“Can you tell us what it was about?” asks Ortiz.

“In general terms?”

“We can start there.”

“It was business. A client who was referred to me by Mr. Rush.”

“Would that client have been Mr. Metz?” asks Padgett.

“I’m going to suggest that he not answer that,” says Harry.

“I thought you were just watching and listening.” Ortiz looks at him over his shoulder.

“Sometimes I hit the ball back,” says Harry.

“Fine. Why shouldn’t Mr. Madriani answer my question?” he says.

“The identity of a client, before there has been any public representation,” says Harry, “is a matter of attorney-client privilege.”

I smile at Ortiz. “Aren’t lawyers a pain in the ass?”

“Does that mean you represented Mr. Metz?” says Ortiz.

“No. It means that I’m not going to answer your question.”

“Why not? What’s to hide?” says Padgett.

“The identity of a former client,” says Harry.

“Who is dead,” says Padgett.

“Assuming that that client was Mr. Metz,” says Harry, “which is the very question you’re asking, and we’re declining to answer.”

They run up a dead end. I can tell by the body English that Padgett doesn’t want to leave it. Ortiz takes the higher road and chooses to ignore it.

“We’re informed that you had one meeting with Mr. Metz to determine whether or not you would take his case, and that you declined.”

They have been talking to Dana.

“Can you tell us why you didn’t take the case?”

“Assuming your information is correct, which I’m not conceding, I couldn’t comment. I know. It looks like we’re not getting very far. But I am trying,” I tell him.

“So you did talk to Metz?” says Padgett.

“Did I say that, Harry?”

“No.”

“I didn’t say that.”

We all know why Harry is here. So that Padgett, acting as scribe, can’t get creative with his pencil and notepad.

“But he did have some legal problems,” says Ortiz.

“We understand he was indicted,” says Padgett.

“If you say so.”

“It was in the newspapers,” says Padgett.

“Was it?”

“Let’s cut to the chase,” says Padgett. “We know you met with Rush that morning. We know the conversation was not some hold-your-dick-and-tap-it-till-it-drips pass-the-time-of-day in the men’s room. We have a witness,” he says, “saw you huddled over a table with the man less than ten minutes before he was shot and killed.”

“Then why are you asking me?”

“Because we want to know what you were talking about.”

“Your witness didn’t hear enough to tell you that?”

Padgett says “No” before his partner can walk over the top of him verbally, saying: “We wanted to hear what you would say.”

“Which is it, yes or no? Because if your witness did hear it, then that person would be your best source of information. Because I can’t discuss it.”

“So it was attorney-client?” says Ortiz.

“I thought we already established that.”

“If Rush was your friend, why wouldn’t you want to help us catch his killer?” says Padgett.

“Why don’t you ask me if I still beat my wife?” I tell him.

“Do you?” he asks.

“She died of cancer several years ago,” says Harry.

Padgett looks at me. “Sorry.”

“All we want to know is what Metz told you during your initial client interview,” says Ortiz.

“Unless and until I’m told by a judge to the contrary, any communications I’ve had with any clients are privileged.”

“Even dead clients?” says Ortiz.

“Even dead ones,” I tell him.

“I see, you don’t make the rules, you just follow them, is that it?” says Padgett.

“You’re not as dumb as you look,” says Harry.

“Harry. They’re just trying to do their job,” I say.

“And you’re not helping much,” says Ortiz.

“I’m sorry. But I have to do mine,” replies Harry.

“How long did you know Nick Rush?” Ortiz takes a different tack.

“Ten years. More or less.”

“How did you meet?”

“I’ve thought about that a few times since it happened. You know how it is. When you lose someone you know. I think it was probably a conference or a seminar. Continuing education of the bar maybe. But to be honest, I can’t remember the specific event or where it was.”

“Let me ask you a question. How could Metz be a client if you didn’t take his case?” Padgett doesn’t want to give it up.

“You know as well as I do, whether I declined representation or not, whatever a client told me in an initial interview…” He’s starting to write in his notepad. “And mind you, that’s not saying that I ever talked to Mr. Metz about legal matters, but if I did, it would be covered by privilege.” He scratches it out, closes his notebook. As he does, he sees the device on my desk. He looks at it for a second. My heart gains ten extra beats.

“I’m told you don’t do drug cases,” says Ortiz.

I try to look at him, but my gaze keeps going back to his partner who is still looking at the device on my desk.

“Is that true?”

“Excuse me?”

“That you don’t do drug cases?”

“As a general policy, no. I don’t handle cases involving narcotics.”

If Padgett picks up the device, turns it on, and sees Nick’s name, we will all be finishing this downtown, probably in front of a judge where I can be charged with concealing evidence in a capital case.

“So maybe you have some redeeming qualities after all.” Padgett forgets about the device for a moment and looks at me.

I smile at him.

“Why don’t you do narcotics?” he asks.

“I have no expertise in the field.”

“I take it back,” he says.

“Is that the only reason?” says Ortiz.

“Any other reasons would be personal and have nothing to do with any particular client or case,” I say.

“Is that why you wouldn’t take the Metz case? Because it involved drugs?”

“Assuming Metz was my client, for purposes of an initial interview, the reasons that I might not take such a case would be privileged.”

“We’re back to that?” says Padgett.

“That means it’s none of your business,” says Harry.

“You’re wrong,” says Padgett. “They’re both dead, and that is our business. Besides, who are you protecting, a client who doesn’t exist?”

“Until a court tells me otherwise.”

“I think if Metz were here he might want you to help us,” says Ortiz. “I sure would if somebody pumped me full of holes while I was standing on the sidewalk minding my own business.”