Ken Follett - the Third Twin (1996)

“You’re welcome.”

She returned to the lab and said to Lisa: “Apparently, Steven and Dennis were born thirteen days apart and in different states. I just don’t understand it.”

Lisa opened a fresh box of test tubes. “Well, there’s one incontrovertible test. If they have the same DNA, they’re identical twins, no matter what anyone says about their birth.” She took out two of the little glass tubes. They were a couple of inches long. Each had a lid at the top and a conical bottom. She opened a pack of labels, wrote “Dennis Pinker” on one and “Steven Logan” on the other, then labeled the tubes and placed them in a rack.

She broke the seal on Dennis’s blood and put a single drop in one test tube. Then she took a vial of Steven’s blood out of the refrigerator and did the same.

Using a precision-calibrated pipette—a pipe with a bulb at one end—she added a tiny measured quantity of chloroform to each test tube. Then she picked up a fresh pipette and added a similarly exact amount of phenol.

She closed both test tubes and put them in the Whirlimixer to agitate them for a few seconds. The chloroform would dissolve the fats and the phenol would disrupt the proteins, but the long coiled molecules of deoxyribonucleic acid would remain intact.

Lisa put the tubes back in the rack. “That’s all we can do for the next few hours,” she said.

The water-dissolved phenol would slowly separate from the chloroform. A meniscus would form in the tube at the boundary. The DNA would be in the watery part, which could be drawn off with a pipette for the next stage of the test. But that would have to wait for the morning.

A phone rang somewhere. Jeannie frowned; it sounded as if it were coming from her office. She stepped across the corridor and picked it up. “Yes?”

“Is this Dr. Ferrami?”

Jeannie hated people who called and demanded to know your name without introducing themselves. It was like knocking on someone’s front door and saying: “Who the hell are you?” She bit back a sarcastic response and said: “I’m Jeannie Ferrami. Who is this calling, please?”

“Naomi Ereelander, New York Times.” She sounded like a heavy smoker in her fifties. “I have some questions for you.”

“At this time of night?”

“I work all hours. It seems you do too.”

“Why are you calling me?”

“I’m researching an article about scientific ethics.”

“Oh.” Jeannie thought immediately about Steve not knowing he might be adopted. It was an ethical problem, though not an insoluble one—but surely the Times did not know about it? “What’s your interest?”

“I believe you scan medical databases looking for suitable subjects to study.”

“Oh, okay.” Jeannie relaxed. She had nothing to worry about on this score. “Well, I’ve devised a search engine that scans computer data and finds matching pairs. My purpose is to find identical twins. It can be used on any kind of database.”

“But you’ve gained access to medical records in order to use this program.”

“It’s important to define what you mean by access. I’ve been careful not to trespass on anyone’s privacy. I never see anyone’s medical details. The program doesn’t print the records.”

“What does it print?”

“The names of the two individuals, and their addresses and phone numbers.”

“But it prints the names in pairs.” “Of course, that’s the point.”

“So if you used it on, say, a database of electroencephalograms, it would tell you that John Doe’s brain waves are the same as Jim Fitz’s.”

“The same or similar. But it would not tell me anything about either man’s health.”

“However, if you knew previously that John Doe was a paranoid schizophrenic, you could conclude that Jim Fitz was, too.”

“We would never know such a thing.”

“You might know John Doe.”

“How?”

“He might be your janitor, anything.”

“Oh, come on!”

“It’s possible.”

“Is that going to be your story?”

“Maybe.”

“Okay, it’s theoretically possible, but the chance is so small that any reasonable person would discount it.”

“That’s arguable.”

The reporter seemed determined to see an outrage, regardless of the facts, Jeannie thought; and she began to worry. She had enough problems without getting the damn newspapers on her back. “How real is all this?” she said. “Have you actually found anyone who feels their privacy has been violated?”

“I’m interested in the potentiality.”

Jeannie was struck by a thought. “Who told you to call me, anyway?”

“Why do you ask?”

“Same reason you’ve been asking me questions. I’d like to know the truth.”

“I can’t tell you.”

“That’s interesting,” Jeannie said. “I’ve talked to you at some length about my research and my methods. I have nothing to hide. But you can’t say the same. You appear to be, well, ashamed, I guess. Are you ashamed of the way you found out about my project?”

“I’m not ashamed of anything,” the reporter snapped.

Jeannie felt herself getting cross. Who did this woman think she was? “Well, someone’s ashamed. Otherwise why won’t you tell me who he is? Or she?”

“I have to protect my sources.”

“From what?” Jeannie knew she should lay off. Nothing was to be gained by antagonizing the press. But the woman’s attitude was insufferable. “As I’ve explained, there’s nothing wrong with my methods and they don’t threaten anyone’s privacy. So why should your informant be so secretive?”

“People have reasons—”

“It looks as if your informant was malicious, doesn’t it?” Even as she said it, Jeannie was thinking, Why should anyone want to do this to me?

“I can’t comment on that.”

“No comment, huh?” she said sarcastically. “I must remember that line.”

“Dr. Ferrami, I’d like to thank you for your cooperation.”

“Don’t mention it,” Jeannie said, and she hung up.

She stared at the phone for a long moment. “Now what the hell was that all about?” she said.

WEDNESDAY

21

BERRINGTON JONES SLEPT BADLY.

He spent the night with Pippa Harpenden. Pippa was a secretary in the physics department, and a lot of professors had asked her out, including several married men, but Berrington was the only one she dated. He had dressed beautifully, taken her to an intimate restaurant, and ordered exquisite wine. He had basked in the envious glances of men his own age dining with their ugly old wives. He had brought her home and lit candles and put on silk pajamas and made love to her slowly until she gasped with pleasure.

But he woke up at four o’clock and thought of all the things that could go wrong with his plan. Hank Stone had been sucking down the publisher’s cheap wine yesterday afternoon; he might just forget all about his conversation with Berrington. If he remembered it, the editors of the New York Times might still decide not to follow up the story. They might make some inquiries and realize there was nothing much wrong with what Jeannie was doing. Or they could simply move too slowly and start looking into it next week, when it would be top late.

After he had been tossing and turning for a while, Pippa mumbled: “Are you all right, Berry?”

He stroked her long blond hair, and she made sleepily encouraging noises. Making love to a beautiful woman was normally consolation for any amount of trouble, but he sensed it would not work now. He had too much on his mind. It would have been a relief to talk to Pippa about his problems—she was intelligent, and she would be understanding and sympathetic—but he could not reveal such secrets to anyone.