Andrew Lobaczewski - Political Ponerology - A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes

they were used as a means of repression , is that psychiatry in the former

Soviet Union “is confronted with a gap of about fifty years”. Western litera-

ture on psychiatry was forbidden in the Soviet Union, psychiatrists who stood

up against the political abuse of their science ended up behind bars or were

themselves declared to be “insidiously schizophrenic” . “A Mess in Psychia-

try”, an interview with Robert van Voren, General Secretary of Geneva Ini-

tiative on Psychiatry, published in the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant on

August 9, 1997 [Editor’s note.]

POLITICAL PONEROLOGY

257

This accumulation of proper knowledge would, within a

very short time, enable the undertaking of investigations whose

meaning we already understand. Missing elements and insuffi-

ciently investigated questions would be complemented and

deepened by means of the appropriate detailed research. The

diagnosis of the pathocratic state of affairs would then be

elaborated within the first dozen or so years of the formation of

the pathocracy, especially if the latter is imposed. The basis of

the deductive rationale would be significantly wider than any-

thing the author can present here, and would be illustrated by

means of a rich body of analytical and statistical material.

Once transmitted to world opinion, such a diagnosis would

quickly become incorporated into it that opinion, forcing naive

political and propaganda doctrines out of societal conscious-

ness. It would reach the nations that were the objects of the

pathocratic empire’s expansionist intentions. This would render

the usefulness of any such propagandized ideology as a

pathocratic Trojan horse doubtful at best.

In spite of differences among them, other countries with

normal human systems would be united by characteristic soli-

darity in the defense of an understood danger, similar to the

solidarity linking normal people living under pathocratic rule.

This consciousness, popularized in the countries affected by

this phenomenon, would simultaneously reinforce psychologi-

cal resistance on the part of normal human societies and furnish

them with new measures of self defense.

Can any pathocratic empire risk permitting such a possibil-

ity?

In times when the above-mentioned disciplines are develop-

ing swiftly in many countries, the problem of preventing such a

psychiatric threat becomes a matter of “to be or not to be” for

pathocracy. Any possibility of such a situation emerging must

thus be staved off prophylactically and skillfully, both within

and without the empire. At the same time, the empire is able to

find effective preventive measures thanks to its consciousness

of being different as well as that specific psychological knowl-

edge of psychopaths with which we are already familiar, par-

tially reinforced by academic knowledge.

258

PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY

Both inside and outside the boundaries of countries affected

by the above-mentioned phenomenon, a purposeful and con-

scious system of control, terror, and diversion is thus set to

work .

Any scientific papers published under such governments or

imported from abroad must be monitored to ascertain that they

do not contain any data which could be harmful to the pathoc-

racy. Specialists with superior talent become the objects of

blackmail and malicious control. This of course causes the

results to become inferior with reference to these areas of sci-

ence.

The entire operation must of course be managed in such a

way as to avoid attracting the attention of public opinion in

countries with normal human structures. The effects of such a

“bad break” could be too far-reaching. This explains why peo-

ple caught doing investigative work in this area are destroyed

without a sound and suspicious persons are forced abroad to

become the objects of appropriately organized harassment

campaigns there.112

Battles are thus being fought on secret fronts which may be

reminiscent of the Second World War. The soldiers and leaders

fighting in various theaters were not aware that their fate de-

pended on the outcome of that other war, waged by scientists

and other soldiers, whose goal was preventing the Germans

from producing the atom bomb. The Allies won that battle, and

the United States became the first to possess this lethal weapon.

For the present, however, the West keeps losing scientific and

political battles on this new secret front. Lone fighters are

looked upon as odd, denied assistance, or forced to work hard

for their bread. Meanwhile, the ideological Trojan horse keeps

invading new countries.

An examination of the methodology of such battles, both on

the internal and the external fronts, points to that specific

pathocratic knowledge so difficult to comprehend in the light

of the natural language of concepts. In order to be able to con-

trol people and those relatively non-popularized areas of sci-

112 This is also why !obaczewski was deprived of the data he had assembled

over so many years that would have supported the information presented in

this book. [Editor’s note.]

POLITICAL PONEROLOGY

259

ence, one must know, or be able to sense, what is going on and

which fragments of psychopathology are most dangerous. The

examiner of this methodology thus also becomes aware of the

boundaries and imperfections of this self-knowledge and prac-

tice, i.e. the other side’s weaknesses, errors, and gaffes, and

may manage to take advantage of them.

In nations with pathocratic systems, supervision over scien-

tific and cultural organizations is assigned to a special depart-

ment of especially trusted people, a “Nameless Office” com-

posed almost entirely of relatively intelligent persons who be-

tray characteristic psychopathic traits. These people must be

capable of completing their academic studies, albeit sometimes

by forcing examiners to issue generous evaluations. Their tal-

ents are usually inferior to those of average students, especially

regarding psychological science. In spite of that, they are re-

warded for their services by obtaining academic degrees and

positions and are allowed to represent their country’s scientific

community abroad. As especially trusted individuals, they are

allowed to not participate in local meetings of the party, and

even to avoid joining it entirely. In case of need, they might

then pass for non-party. In spite of that, these scientific and

cultural superintendents are well known to the society of nor-

mal people, who learn the art of differentiation rather quickly.

They are not always properly distinguished from agents of the

political police; although they consider themselves to be in a

better class than the latter, they must nevertheless cooperate

with them.

We often meet with such people abroad, in the countries of

normal people, where various foundations and institutes give

them scientific grants with the conviction that they are thereby

assisting the development of proper knowledge in countries

under “communist” governments. These benefactors do not

realize that they are rendering a disservice to such science and

to real scientists by allowing the supervisors to attain a certain

semi-authentic authority, and by allowing them to become