Andrew Lobaczewski - Political Ponerology - A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes

have ever read. And then, in a very early chapter, she describes

a “composite” case where the subject spent his childhood blow-

ing up frogs with fire-crackers. It is widely known that George

W. Bush did this, so one naturally wonders...

In any event, even without Dr. Stout’s work, at the time we

were studying the matter, we realized that what we were learn-

ing was very important to everyone because as the data was

assembled, we saw that the clues, the profiles, revealed that the

issues we were facing were faced by everyone at one time or

another, to one extent or another. We also began to realize that

the profiles that emerged also describe rather accurately many

individuals who seek positions of power in fields of authority,

most particularly politics and commerce. That’s really not so

surprising an idea, but it honestly hadn’t occurred to us until

we saw the patterns and recognized them in the behaviors of

numerous historical figures and, lately, including George W.

Bush and members of his administration.

Current day statistics tell us that there are more psychologi-

cally sick people than healthy ones. If you take a sampling of

individuals in any given field, you are likely to find that a sig-

nificant number of them display pathological symptoms to one

extent or another. Politics is no exception, and, by its very na-

ture, would tend to attract more of the pathological “dominator

types” than other fields. That is only logical, and we began to

realize that it was not only logical, it was horrifyingly accurate;

horrifying because pathology among people in power can have

disastrous effects on all of the people under the control of such

pathological individuals. And so, we decided to write about this

subject and publish it on the Internet.

As the material went up, letters from our readers began to

come in thanking us for putting a name to what was happening

to them in their personal lives as well as helping them to under-

stand what was happening in a world that seems to have gone

completely mad. We began to think that it was an epidemic,

and, in a certain sense, we were right. If an individual with a

POLITICAL PONEROLOGY

25

highly contagious illness works in a job that puts them in con-

tact with the public, an epidemic is the result. In the same way,

if an individual in a position of political power is a psychopath,

he or she can create an epidemic of psychopathology in people

who are not, essentially, psychopathic. Our ideas along this line

were soon to receive confirmation from an unexpected source:

Andrew !obaczewski, the author of the book you are about to

read. I received an email as follows:

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen.

I have got your Special Research Project on psychopathy

by my computer. You are doing a most important and valu-

able work for the future of nations.[…]

I am a very aged clinical psychologist. Forty years ago I

took part in a secret investigation of the real nature and psy-

chopathology of the macro-social phenomenon called “Com-

munism”. The other researchers were the scientists of the pre-

vious generation who are now passed away.

The profound study of the nature of psychopathy, which

played the essential and inspirational part in this macro-social

psychopathologic phenomenon, and distinguishing it from

other mental anomalies, appeared to be the necessary prepara-

tion for understanding the entire nature of the phenomenon.

The large part of the work, you are doing now, was done in

those times. …

I am able to provide you with a most valuable scientific

document, useful for your purposes. It is my book “Political

Ponerology – A science on the nature of evil adjusted for po-

litical purposes”. You may also find copy of this book in the

Library of Congress and in some university and public librar-

ies in the USA.

Be so kind and contact me so that I may mail a copy to

you.

Very truly yours!

Andrew M. !obaczewski

I promptly wrote a reply saying yes, I would very much like

to read his book. A couple of weeks later the manuscript ar-

rived in the mail.

26

EDITOR’S PREFACE

As I read, I realized that what I was holding in my hand was

essentially a chronicle of a descent into hell, transformation,

and triumphant return to the world with knowledge of that hell

that was priceless for the rest of us, particularly in this day and

time when it seems evident that a similar hell is enveloping the

planet. The risks that were taken by the group of scientists that

did the research on which this book is based are beyond the

comprehension of most of us.

Many of them were young, just starting in their careers

when the Nazis began to stride in their hundred league jack-

boots across Europe. These researchers lived through that, and

then when the Nazis were driven out and replaced by the

Communists under the heel of Stalin, they faced years of op-

pression the likes of which those of us today who are choosing

to take a stand against the Bush Reich cannot even imagine.

But, based on the syndrome that describes the onset of the dis-

ease, it seems that the United States, in particular, and perhaps

the entire world, will soon enter into “bad times” of such horror

and despair that the Holocaust of World War II will seem like

just a practice run.

And so, since they were there, and they lived through it and

brought back information to the rest of us, it may well save our

lives to have a map to guide us in the falling darkness.

Laura Knight-Jadczyk

AUTHOR’S FOREWORD

In presenting my honored readers with this volume, which I

generally worked on during the early hours before leaving to

make a difficult living, I would first like to apologize for the

defects which are the result of anomalous circumstances. I

readily admit that these lacunae should be filled, time-

consuming as that may be, because the facts on which this

book are based are urgently needed; through no fault of the

author’s, these data have come too late.

The reader is entitled to an explanation of the long history

and circumstances under which this work was compiled, not

just of the content itself. This is, in fact, the third manuscript I

have created on this same subject. I threw the first manuscript

into a central-heating furnace, having been warned just in time

about an official search, which took place minutes later. I sent

the second draft to a Church dignitary at the Vatican by means

of an American tourist and was absolutely unable to obtain any

kind of information about the fate of the parcel once it was left

with him.

This long history of subject-matter elaboration made work

on the third version even more laborious. Prior paragraphs and

former phrases from one or both of the first drafts haunt the

writer’s mind and make proper planning of the content more

difficult.

The two lost drafts were written in very convoluted lan-

guage for the benefit of specialists with the necessary back-

ground, particularly in the field of psychopathology. The irre-

trievable disappearance of the second version also meant the

28

AUTHOR’S FOREWORD

loss of the overwhelming majority of statistical data and facts

which would have been so valuable and conclusive for special-

ists in the field. Several analyses of individual cases were also