Franco Taroni - Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists

Здесь есть возможность читать онлайн «Franco Taroni - Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists» — ознакомительный отрывок электронной книги совершенно бесплатно, а после прочтения отрывка купить полную версию. В некоторых случаях можно слушать аудио, скачать через торрент в формате fb2 и присутствует краткое содержание. Жанр: unrecognised, на английском языке. Описание произведения, (предисловие) а так же отзывы посетителей доступны на портале библиотеки ЛибКат.

Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists: краткое содержание, описание и аннотация

Предлагаем к чтению аннотацию, описание, краткое содержание или предисловие (зависит от того, что написал сам автор книги «Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists»). Если вы не нашли необходимую информацию о книге — напишите в комментариях, мы постараемся отыскать её.

T
he leading resource in the statistical evaluation and interpretation of forensic evidence
The third edition of 
 is fully updated to provide the latest research and developments in the use of statistical techniques to evaluate and interpret evidence. Courts are increasingly aware of the importance of proper evidence assessment when there is an element of uncertainty. Because of the increasing availability of data, the role of statistical and probabilistic reasoning is gaining a higher profile in criminal cases. That’s why lawyers, forensic scientists, graduate students, and researchers will find this book an essential resource, one which explores how forensic evidence can be evaluated and interpreted statistically. It’s written as an accessible source of information for all those with an interest in the evaluation and interpretation of forensic scientific evidence. 
Discusses the entire chain of reasoning–from evidence pre-assessment to court presentation; Includes material for the understanding of evidence interpretation for single and multiple trace evidence; Provides real examples and data for improved understanding. Since the first edition of this book was published in 1995, this respected series has remained a leading resource in the statistical evaluation of forensic evidence. It shares knowledge from authors in the fields of statistics and forensic science who are international experts in the area of evidence evaluation and interpretation. This book helps people to deal with uncertainty related to scientific evidence and propositions. It introduces a method of reasoning that shows how to update beliefs coherently and to act rationally. In this edition, readers can find new information on the topics of elicitation, subjective probabilities, decision analysis, and cognitive bias, all discussed in a Bayesian framework.

Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists — читать онлайн ознакомительный отрывок

Ниже представлен текст книги, разбитый по страницам. Система сохранения места последней прочитанной страницы, позволяет с удобством читать онлайн бесплатно книгу «Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists», без необходимости каждый раз заново искать на чём Вы остановились. Поставьте закладку, и сможете в любой момент перейти на страницу, на которой закончили чтение.

Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

First law of probability for dependent events

(1.6) Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists - изображение 495

If Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists - изображение 496is known, Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists - изображение 497and Second law of probability for dependent events 17 Events - фото 498.

Second law of probability for dependent events

(1.7) Events and are said to be dependent if the knowledge that - фото 499

Events картинка 500and картинка 501are said to be dependent if the knowledge that картинка 502has occurred affects the probability that картинка 503will occur, and vice versa . For example, let картинка 504be the outcome of a draw of a card from a well‐shuffled pack of 52 playing cards. This card is not replaced in the pack so there are now only 51 cards in the pack. Let картинка 505be the draw of a card from this reduced pack of cards. Let картинка 506be the event ‘ an Ace is drawn ’. Thus картинка 507= 4/52 = 1/13. (Note here the conditioning information картинка 508that the pack is well‐shuffled, with its implication that each of the 52 cards is equally likely to be drawn has been omitted for simplicity of notation; explicit mention of картинка 509will be omitted in many cases but its existence should never be forgotten.) Let Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists - изображение 510be the event ‘ an Ace is drawn ’ also. Then Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists - изображение 511is the probability that an Ace was drawn at the second draw, given that an Ace was drawn at the first draw (and given everything else that is known, in particular that the first card was not replaced). There are 51 cards at the time of the second draw of which 3 are Aces. (Remember that an Ace was drawn the first time which is the information contained in Thus It is now possible to formulate the third law of probability for - фото 512.) Thus It is now possible to formulate the third law of probability for dependent - фото 513. It is now possible to formulate the third law of probability for dependent events.

Third law of probability for dependent events

(1.8) Thus in the example of the drawing of the Aces from the pack the probability - фото 514

Thus in the example of the drawing of the Aces from the pack, the probability of drawing two Aces is

Example 13A study of the brains of 120 road accident fatalities given in - фото 515

Example 1.3A study of the brains of 120 road accident fatalities given in Pittella and Gusmäo (2003, Table 2), reproduced in Lucy (2005) observed the numbers of diffuse vascular injuries (DVI) and diffuse axonal injuries (DAI) with the results presented in Table 1.3.

Table 1.3Presence and absence of diffuse vascular injuries (DVI) and diffuse axonal injuries (DAI) in 120 road accident fatalities.

Source: From Pittella and Gusmäo (2003). ©ASTM International. Reprinted with permissions of ASTM International.

DAI
DVI Present Absent Total
Present 14 0 14
Absent 82 24 106
Total 96 24 120

Denote the presence of DVI by картинка 516and the presence of DAI by картинка 517. Then various probabilities for the incidences of the two types of injuries in the population of road accident fatalities can be estimated from this sample of 120 fatalities. Thus картинка 518is estimated by 14/120, the total number of DVI divided by the total number of fatalities. Similarly картинка 519is estimated by 96/120, the number of DAI divided by the total number of fatalities.

The third law of probability for dependent events ( 1.8) can be verified using Table 1.3. For example,

Alternatively Thus for dependent events and - фото 520

Alternatively

Thus for dependent events and the third law of probability 18 may - фото 521

Thus, for dependent events, and the third law of probability 18 may be written as 19 - фото 522and the third law of probability 18 may be written as 19 where the - фото 523, the third law of probability, ( 1.8) may be written as

Читать дальше
Тёмная тема
Сбросить

Интервал:

Закладка:

Сделать

Похожие книги на «Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists»

Представляем Вашему вниманию похожие книги на «Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists» списком для выбора. Мы отобрали схожую по названию и смыслу литературу в надежде предоставить читателям больше вариантов отыскать новые, интересные, ещё непрочитанные произведения.


Отзывы о книге «Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists»

Обсуждение, отзывы о книге «Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists» и просто собственные мнения читателей. Оставьте ваши комментарии, напишите, что Вы думаете о произведении, его смысле или главных героях. Укажите что конкретно понравилось, а что нет, и почему Вы так считаете.

x