Soil Health Analysis, Set

This chapter emphasizes the importance of collecting metadata that provide adequate information to support the wide range of soil biological, chemical, and physical measurements being quantified for various soil health assessments. Examples of metadata or categorical data that may be useful are suggested but should not be viewed as either extensive or exhaustive. Furthermore, it should not be considered necessary to record every item in the list but rather those data that may contribute to understanding the range of soil health indices being measured for a specific assessment.

The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the USDA or the ARS of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

1 Askari, M. S., & Holden, N. M. (2015). Quantitative soil quality indexing of temperate arable management systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 150, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.01.010

2 Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., . . . Brussaard, L. (2018). Soil quality: A critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 120, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030

3 Delgado, J. A., Weyers, S., Dell, C., Harmel, D., Kleinman, P., Sistani, K., . . . Van Pelt, S. (2016). USDA Agricultural Research Service creates Nutrient Uptake and Outcome Network (NUOnet). Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 71, 147A–148A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.6.147A

4 Del Grosso, S. J., White, J. W., Wilson, G., Vandenberg, B., Karlen, D. L., Follett, R. F., . . . James, D. (2013). Introducing the GRACEnet/REAP data contribution, discovery, and retrieval system. Journal of Environmental Quality, 42, 1274–1280. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.03.0097

5 Doran, J. W. (2002). Soil health and global sustainability: Translating science into practice. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 88, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167‐8809(01)00246‐8

6 Jawson, M. D., Shafer, S. R., Franzluebbers, A. J., Parkin, T. B., & Follett, R. F. (2005). GRACEnet: Greenhouse gas reduction through agricultural carbon enhancement network. Soil and Tillage Research, 83, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.015

7 Kallenbach, C., & Grandy, A. S. (2011). Controls over soil microbial biomass responses to carbon amendments in agricultural systems: A meta‐analysis. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 144, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.020

8 Karlen, D. L., Ditzler, C. A., & Andrews, S. S. (2003). Soil quality: Why and how? Geoderma, 114, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016‐7061(03)00039‐9

9 Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006). World map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 15, 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941‐2948/2006/0130

10 Laganière, J., Angers, D. A., & Paré, D. (2010). Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: A meta‐analysis. Global Change Biology, 16, 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2486.2009.01930.x

11 Liebig, M., Varvel, G., & Honeycutt, W. (2010). Guidelines for site description and soil sampling, processing, analysis, and archiving. In R. Follett (Ed.), GRACEnet Sampling Protocols (pp. 1–5). Washington, DC: USDA–ARS.

12 Liebig, M. A., Franzluebbers, A. J., Alvarez, C., Chiesa, T. D., Lewczuk, N., Piñeiro, G., . . . Sawchik, J. (2016). MAGGnet: An international network to foster mitigation of agricultural greenhouse gases. Carbon Management, 7, 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2016.1180586

13 Liebig, M. A., Franzluebbers, A. J., & Follett, R. F. (Eds.). (2012). Managing agricultural greenhouse gases: Coordinated agricultural research through GRACEnet to address our changing climate. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.

14 Mahal, N. K., Castellano, M. J., & Miguez, F. E. (2018). Conservation agriculture practices increase potentially mineralizable nitrogen: A meta‐analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 82, 1270–1278. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.07.0245

15 Robinson, D. A., Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Jones, A., Montanarella, L., Tye, A., & Obst, C. G. (2017). Soil natural capital in Europe; A framework for state and change assessment. Science Reports, 7, 6706. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐017‐06819‐3

16 Zhou, H., Zhang, D., Wang, P., Liu, X., Cheng, K., Li, L., . . . Pan, G. (2017). Changes in microbial biomass and the metabolic quotient with biochar addition to agricultural soils: A meta‐analysis. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 239, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.006

1 Abbreviations: DET, data entry template; GRACEnet, Greenhouse gas Reduction through Agricultural Carbon Enhancement network; SOC, soil organic carbon.

Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.